Courseiva
hardMultiple SelectObjective-mapped

300-410 Practice Question: Which TWO statements correctly describe the…

Which TWO statements correctly describe the behavior of EIGRP route summarization when using the 'summary-address' command under an interface? (Choose TWO.)

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.

Correct answer & explanation

A summary route is advertised with the metric equal to the best metric among the component routes.

EIGRP route summarization using the interface-level 'summary-address' command creates a local discard route to prevent routing loops, suppresses more specific routes from being advertised out that interface, and does not automatically summarize connected routes unless they are redistributed. The summary route is advertised with the metric of the best component route, and the administrative distance of the summary is set to 5 by default, not 90.

Answer analysis

Option-by-option breakdown

For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.

  • A summary route is advertised with the metric equal to the best metric among the component routes.

    Why this is correct

    Correct. EIGRP uses the best (lowest) metric from the component routes for the summary route advertisement.

  • The summary route is automatically assigned an administrative distance of 90 by default.

    Why it's wrong here

    Incorrect. The default administrative distance for an EIGRP summary route is 5, not 90. The AD of 90 is for internal EIGRP routes.

  • A local discard route (null0) is automatically installed for the summary prefix to prevent routing loops.

    Why this is correct

    Correct. EIGRP automatically installs a discard route (to Null0) for the summary prefix to avoid loops when the more specific routes are not present.

  • The 'summary-address' command also summarizes connected routes that fall within the summary range.

    Why it's wrong here

    Incorrect. Connected routes are not automatically summarized; they must be redistributed into EIGRP first.

  • More specific routes are still advertised out the same interface even after the summary is configured.

    Why it's wrong here

    Incorrect. The purpose of the summary-address command is to suppress the advertisement of more specific routes out that interface.

Quick reference

Routing Protocol Comparison

ProtocolMetricMax HopsAlgorithmType
RIP v2Hop count15Bellman-FordDistance vector
OSPFCost (bandwidth)UnlimitedDijkstra (SPF)Link state
EIGRPComposite metricUnlimitedDUALHybrid
IS-ISCostUnlimitedDijkstraLink state
BGPPolicy / attributesUnlimitedPath vectorPath vector

RIP's 15-hop limit makes it unsuitable for large networks. OSPF and EIGRP dominate modern enterprise deployments.

About these practice questions

Courseiva writes every 300-410 question from scratch — 1,966 in total, each with an explanation and a wrong-answer breakdown. None are copied from real exams or dumps. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →

How Courseiva writes practice questions · Editorial policy

Same concept, more angles

2 more ways this is tested on 300-410

These questions test the same concept from different angles. Work through them to make sure you can recognise it however the exam phrases it.

Variation 1. In EIGRP, what is the default behavior of auto-summary in IOS-XE versions 15.0 and later?

medium
  • A.Auto-summary is enabled by default.
  • B.Auto-summary is disabled by default.
  • C.Auto-summary is enabled only for EIGRP named mode.
  • D.Auto-summary is disabled only for EIGRP classic mode.

Why B: Cisco IOS-XE 15.0 and later have auto-summary disabled by default for EIGRP, unlike older IOS versions where it was enabled by default.

Variation 2. A network engineer is troubleshooting a connectivity issue between two branches connected via a WAN link. Router R1 (10.1.0.0/16) is summarizing its directly connected subnets (10.1.1.0/24, 10.1.2.0/24, 10.1.3.0/24) as a single 10.1.0.0/16 route to Router R2 via EIGRP. Users at R2 report that they cannot reach the 10.1.4.0/24 subnet, which was recently added to R1. What is the most likely cause of the problem?

medium
  • A.The summary route 10.1.0.0/16 was configured manually, and the new subnet 10.1.4.0/24 is not within the summary range because the mask is too specific.
  • B.The new subnet 10.1.4.0/24 was not advertised because the summary address command suppresses more specific routes, but the summary itself is not being generated due to a missing network statement under the EIGRP process.
  • C.The WAN link is down, causing R2 to lose the summary route.
  • D.The engineer forgot to configure the summary address on the interface facing R2 for the new subnet.

Why B: The summary route 10.1.0.0/16 includes the new subnet 10.1.4.0/24, but the issue indicates that the summary is not being updated or is too broad, causing a mismatch. The most likely cause is that the summary address was configured manually and does not automatically include new subnets unless the summary range is adjusted.

JA

Written by Johnson Ajibi, MSc IT Security

Senior Network & Security Engineer · founder of Courseiva

This 300-410 practice question is part of Courseiva's free Cisco certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the 300-410 exam.