hardMultiple ChoiceObjective-mapped
300-410 Practice Question: An engineer configures a route map to filter OSPF…
An engineer configures a route map to filter OSPF routes using a distribute-list in OSPF process 1. The distribute-list references a prefix-list that permits only the 10.0.0.0/8 network. After applying the distribute-list in, the engineer notices that the OSPF neighbor state remains stuck in EXSTART/EXCHANGE. Which is the most likely explanation?
Answer choices
Why each option matters
Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.
Correct answer & explanation
✓
There is an MTU mismatch between the OSPF neighbors, preventing the exchange of Database Description packets.
OSPF distribute-list in only filters routes in the routing table, not LSAs. It does not affect the exchange of LSAs during adjacency formation. The adjacency stall is unrelated to the distribute-list; the issue is likely an MTU mismatch between the interfaces.
Answer analysis
Option-by-option breakdown
For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.
- ✗
The distribute-list is applied incorrectly; it should be applied out instead of in.
Why it's wrong here
The direction does not affect LSA exchange; distribute-list in filters routes after LSDB synchronization.
- ✗
The distribute-list filters LSAs during the exchange, causing the neighbor to be stuck.
Why it's wrong here
Distribute-lists do not filter LSAs; they only filter routes in the RIB.
- ✓
There is an MTU mismatch between the OSPF neighbors, preventing the exchange of Database Description packets.
Why this is correct
MTU mismatch causes OSPF to get stuck in EXSTART/EXCHANGE because DBD packets are dropped.
- ✗
The prefix-list is misconfigured; it should permit 10.0.0.0/8 with a ge 24 operator.
Why it's wrong here
Prefix-list syntax does not affect adjacency state; it only affects route filtering.
Visual reference
Quick reference
Routing Protocol Comparison
| Protocol | Metric | Max Hops | Algorithm | Type |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RIP v2 | Hop count | 15 | Bellman-Ford | Distance vector |
| OSPF | Cost (bandwidth) | Unlimited | Dijkstra (SPF) | Link state |
| EIGRP | Composite metric | Unlimited | DUAL | Hybrid |
| IS-IS | Cost | Unlimited | Dijkstra | Link state |
| BGP | Policy / attributes | Unlimited | Path vector | Path vector |
RIP's 15-hop limit makes it unsuitable for large networks. OSPF and EIGRP dominate modern enterprise deployments.
Go deeper
Related to this question
Learn chapter
Introduction to ENARSI Exam and Network Fundamentals
Key term
Policy Based Routing
Policy Based Routing (PBR) is a technology that allows network traffic to be forwarded based on user-defined policies rather than just the destination IP address in the routing table.
Key term
ACL for Routing Protocols
An ACL for Routing Protocols is a set of rules used to filter routing updates between routers, controlling which network routes are advertised or accepted to improve security and stability.
About these practice questions
One of 1,966 original 300-410 practice questions on Courseiva, each with a full explanation and wrong-answer analysis — not exam dumps or protected exam content. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →
JA
Written by Johnson Ajibi, MSc IT Security
Senior Network & Security Engineer · founder of Courseiva
This 300-410 practice question is part of Courseiva's free Cisco certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the 300-410 exam.