Courseiva
hardMultiple ChoiceObjective-mapped

300-410 Practice Question: A large enterprise network is experiencing…

A large enterprise network is experiencing intermittent connectivity between Site A (R1) and Site B (R2) over an MPLS L3VPN. R1 has the following relevant configuration: route-map RMAP-IN permit 10 match ip address prefix-list PL-ALLOW set extcommunity rt 100:1. Router R2 shows: 'show bgp vpnv4 unicast all neighbors 10.1.1.1 received-routes' lists only the default route, but 'show ip route vrf CUSTOMER' shows no default route. What is the root cause?

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.

Correct answer & explanation

The route-map RMAP-IN is missing a permit statement for other prefixes, causing implicit deny of all routes except the default.

The route-map RMAP-IN on R1 is configured to set the route-target extended community (RT) on incoming BGP VPNv4 routes. However, the route-map is applied inbound on the BGP session, which means it modifies routes received from R2. The match condition uses prefix-list PL-ALLOW, which likely permits only the default route. The set extcommunity rt 100:1 command overwrites or adds the RT, but if the route-map does not explicitly permit other routes (e.g., via a subsequent permit statement), those routes are denied by the implicit deny at the end of the route-map. This causes R1 to reject all routes except the default, but the default route may not be installed in the VRF due to missing RT matching or other VRF configuration issues. The correct fix is to add a permit statement for all necessary prefixes or remove the route-map from the neighbor statement.

Answer analysis

Option-by-option breakdown

For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.

  • The route-map RMAP-IN is missing a permit statement for other prefixes, causing implicit deny of all routes except the default.

    Why this is correct

    The route-map has only one permit sequence matching the default route, so all other VPNv4 routes are denied by the implicit deny at the end of the route-map. This prevents R1 from receiving routes for other prefixes.

  • The prefix-list PL-ALLOW is misconfigured and does not match the default route correctly.

    Why it's wrong here

    The show output indicates the default route is received, so the prefix-list is matching correctly for that route.

  • The VRF CUSTOMER on R1 is missing the route-target import 100:1 command.

    Why it's wrong here

    The route-map sets the RT to 100:1, so if the VRF imports RT 100:1, the route should be installed. The issue is that other routes are not received at all.

  • The BGP session between R1 and R2 is flapping due to a mismatch in the BGP update-source.

    Why it's wrong here

    The show output shows that routes are being received (the default route), so the BGP session is stable.

Visual reference

Source Router + ACL permit 10.0.0.0/8 deny any Server 10.0.0.5 ✓ 192.168.1.1 ✗ dropped ACLs evaluate top-down; first match wins — implicit deny all at end

Go deeper

Related to this question

About these practice questions

One of 1,966 original 300-410 practice questions on Courseiva, each with a full explanation and wrong-answer analysis — not exam dumps or protected exam content. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →

How Courseiva writes practice questions · Editorial policy

JA

Written by Johnson Ajibi, MSc IT Security

Senior Network & Security Engineer · founder of Courseiva

This 300-410 practice question is part of Courseiva's free Cisco certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the 300-410 exam.