Question 568 of 2,152
OSPF Troubleshooting (v2/v3)mediumMultiple ChoiceObjective-mapped

300-410 OSPF Troubleshooting (v2/v3) Practice Question

This 300-410 practice question tests your understanding of ospf troubleshooting (v2/v3). Examine the command output carefully: the correct answer depends on what the output actually shows, not on general recall alone. After answering, compare your reasoning against the explanation and wrong-answer breakdown below. Once you have made your selection, read the full explanation to reinforce the concept and understand why each distractor is designed to mislead on exam day.

A network engineer runs the following command on Router R1:

R1# show ip ospf neighbor

Neighbor ID     Pri   State           Dead Time   Address         Interface
10.1.1.2         1   FULL/DROTHER    00:00:35    192.168.12.2    GigabitEthernet0/0
10.1.1.3         1   FULL/DR         00:00:32    192.168.13.3    GigabitEthernet0/1

Based on this output, which statement is correct?

Question 1mediummultiple choice
Review the full OSPF breakdown →

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.

Correct answer & explanation

Router R1 has a full adjacency with both neighbors and is in a stable state.

The output shows two OSPF neighbors. The neighbor with state FULL/DROTHER indicates it is not the DR or BDR on that segment. The neighbor with state FULL/DR is the designated router. The dead times are within normal range, indicating the adjacency is stable.

Key principle: OSPF neighbour adjacency depends on matching area, hello/dead timers, network type, and authentication — IP reachability alone is not enough.

Answer analysis

Option-by-option breakdown

For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.

  • Router R1 is the DR on the segment connected to GigabitEthernet0/0.

    Why it's wrong here

    The neighbor state is DROTHER, meaning R1 is not the DR; the neighbor is DROTHER, so R1 might be DR or BDR, but the output only shows neighbor states, not R1's own role.

  • Router R1 has a full adjacency with both neighbors and is in a stable state.

    Why this is correct

    Both neighbors show FULL state, indicating complete adjacency. Dead times are decreasing normally, so adjacencies are stable.

    Related concept

    OSPF neighbours must agree on key parameters.

  • Router R1 is experiencing a neighbor timeout on GigabitEthernet0/1.

    Why it's wrong here

    Dead time is 00:00:32, which is not near zero, so no timeout is imminent.

  • Router R1 is not receiving hello packets from 10.1.1.2.

    Why it's wrong here

    The neighbor state is FULL, so hello packets are being received; otherwise the state would be DOWN or INIT.

Common exam traps

Common exam trap: OSPF can fail even when IP connectivity looks correct

OSPF neighbour formation depends on matching areas, timers, network type, authentication and passive-interface behaviour. Do not choose an answer only because the devices can ping.

Trap categories for this question

  • Command / output trap

    The neighbor state is DROTHER, meaning R1 is not the DR; the neighbor is DROTHER, so R1 might be DR or BDR, but the output only shows neighbor states, not R1's own role.

Detailed technical explanation

How to think about this question

OSPF questions usually test the details that control adjacency and route selection. Read the neighbour state, area, router ID and interface configuration before deciding what is wrong.

KKey Concepts to Remember

  • OSPF neighbours must agree on key parameters.
  • Router ID selection can affect neighbour relationships and LSDB output.
  • OSPF cost influences the preferred path.
  • A route can appear in OSPF information but not become the installed route.

TExam Day Tips

  • Check area mismatch first when OSPF adjacency fails.
  • Review passive interfaces when a network is advertised but no neighbour forms.
  • Use show ip ospf neighbor and show ip route clues carefully.

Key takeaway

OSPF neighbour adjacency depends on matching area, hello/dead timers, network type, and authentication — IP reachability alone is not enough.

Real-world example

How this comes up in practice

A network engineer at a university connects two campus buildings via a fibre link. Both routers run OSPF, but no adjacency forms — even though both routers can ping each other. The engineer finds one router is in area 0 and the other in area 1. OSPF adjacency requires matching area numbers, hello/dead timers, and network type. IP reachability alone is not enough.

What to study next

Got this wrong? Here's your next step.

Review OSPF neighbour requirements — matching area type, hello and dead timers, network type, stub flags, and authentication. Study show ip ospf neighbor states (INIT, 2-WAY, FULL). Then practise related 300-410 OSPF questions on adjacency and route selection.

Related practice questions

Related 300-410 practice-question pages

Use these pages to review the topic behind this question. This is how one missed question becomes focused revision.

Practice this exam

Start a free 300-410 practice session

Short sessions build daily habit. Longer sessions build exam-day stamina. Try a timed session to simulate real conditions.

FAQ

Questions learners often ask

What does this 300-410 question test?

OSPF Troubleshooting (v2/v3) — This question tests OSPF Troubleshooting (v2/v3) — OSPF neighbours must agree on key parameters..

What is the correct answer to this question?

The correct answer is: Router R1 has a full adjacency with both neighbors and is in a stable state. — The output shows two OSPF neighbors. The neighbor with state FULL/DROTHER indicates it is not the DR or BDR on that segment. The neighbor with state FULL/DR is the designated router. The dead times are within normal range, indicating the adjacency is stable.

What should I do if I get this 300-410 question wrong?

Review OSPF neighbour requirements — matching area type, hello and dead timers, network type, stub flags, and authentication. Study show ip ospf neighbor states (INIT, 2-WAY, FULL). Then practise related 300-410 OSPF questions on adjacency and route selection.

What is the key concept behind this question?

OSPF neighbours must agree on key parameters.

About these practice questions

Courseiva creates original exam-style practice questions with explanations and wrong-answer analysis. It does not publish real exam questions, exam dumps, or protected exam content. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →

How Courseiva writes practice questions · Editorial policy

Keep practising

More 300-410 practice questions

Last reviewed: Jun 18, 2026

Question Discussion

Share a tip, memory trick, or ask about the reasoning behind this question. Do not post real exam questions, leaked content, braindumps, or copyrighted exam material. Comments are moderated and may be removed without notice.

Loading comments…

Sign in to join the discussion.

This 300-410 practice question is part of Courseiva's free Cisco certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the 300-410 exam.