Question 1,888 of 2,152
OSPF Troubleshooting (v2/v3)hardMultiple ChoiceObjective-mapped

Quick Answer

The answer is that Router 10.1.1.2 is the Designated Router (DR) on the 192.168.12.0/24 segment. This conclusion follows directly from interpreting the OSPF router link states and net link states in the LSDB: the only Net Link State entry shows a Link ID of 192.168.12.2 with an ADV Router of 10.1.1.2, and since Net Link States are only generated by the DR for each broadcast or NBMA segment, the advertising router must be the DR. On the Cisco CCNP ENARSI 300-410 exam, this tests your ability to read the OSPF database output and differentiate between Router LSA (Type 1) and Network LSA (Type 2) responsibilities—a common trap is confusing the Link ID (which is the DR’s interface IP) with the router ID of the DR. Remember: the ADV Router field in a Net Link State always reveals the DR’s router ID, while the Link ID shows the DR’s interface IP on that segment. A helpful memory tip: “Net Link ADV = DR’s RID, Net Link ID = DR’s IP.”

300-410 OSPF Troubleshooting (v2/v3) Practice Question

This 300-410 practice question tests your understanding of ospf troubleshooting (v2/v3). Examine the command output carefully: the correct answer depends on what the output actually shows, not on general recall alone. After answering, compare your reasoning against the explanation and wrong-answer breakdown below. Once you have made your selection, read the full explanation to reinforce the concept and understand why each distractor is designed to mislead on exam day.

A network engineer runs the following command on Router R1:

R1# show ip ospf database

OSPF Router with ID (10.1.1.1) (Process ID 1)

Router Link States (Area 0)

Link ID ADV Router Age Seq# Checksum Link count

10.1.1.1        10.1.1.1        120         0x80000002 0x00A1B2 3
10.1.1.2        10.1.1.2        200         0x80000001 0x00B2C3 2
10.1.1.3        10.1.1.3        150         0x80000003 0x00C3D4 4

Net Link States (Area 0)

Link ID ADV Router Age Seq# Checksum

192.168.12.2    10.1.1.2        180         0x80000001 0x00D4E5

Based on this output, what can be concluded?

Question 1hardmultiple choice
Review the full OSPF breakdown →

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.

Correct answer & explanation

Router 10.1.1.2 is the DR on the segment 192.168.12.0/24.

The database shows router link states for three routers and one net link state. The net link state is advertised by 10.1.1.2, indicating it is the DR on the segment 192.168.12.0/24. The absence of other net link states suggests only one broadcast segment exists.

Key principle: OSPF neighbour adjacency depends on matching area, hello/dead timers, network type, and authentication — IP reachability alone is not enough.

Answer analysis

Option-by-option breakdown

For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.

  • Router R1 is the DR on the segment 192.168.12.0/24.

    Why it's wrong here

    The net link state is advertised by 10.1.1.2, not by R1 (10.1.1.1).

  • Router 10.1.1.2 is the DR on the segment 192.168.12.0/24.

    Why this is correct

    The net link state with Link ID 192.168.12.2 is advertised by 10.1.1.2, meaning it is the DR on that segment.

    Related concept

    OSPF neighbours must agree on key parameters.

  • Router 10.1.1.3 has the highest router ID.

    Why it's wrong here

    Router IDs are 10.1.1.1, 10.1.1.2, and 10.1.1.3; 10.1.1.3 is the highest numerically, but this is not directly relevant to the database output.

  • There is a network LSA for every broadcast segment in area 0.

    Why it's wrong here

    Only one net link state is present, so either there is only one broadcast segment or other segments have no DR elected.

Common exam traps

Common exam trap: OSPF can fail even when IP connectivity looks correct

OSPF neighbour formation depends on matching areas, timers, network type, authentication and passive-interface behaviour. Do not choose an answer only because the devices can ping.

Trap categories for this question

  • Command / output trap

    Router IDs are 10.1.1.1, 10.1.1.2, and 10.1.1.3; 10.1.1.3 is the highest numerically, but this is not directly relevant to the database output.

Detailed technical explanation

How to think about this question

OSPF questions usually test the details that control adjacency and route selection. Read the neighbour state, area, router ID and interface configuration before deciding what is wrong.

KKey Concepts to Remember

  • OSPF neighbours must agree on key parameters.
  • Router ID selection can affect neighbour relationships and LSDB output.
  • OSPF cost influences the preferred path.
  • A route can appear in OSPF information but not become the installed route.

TExam Day Tips

  • Check area mismatch first when OSPF adjacency fails.
  • Review passive interfaces when a network is advertised but no neighbour forms.
  • Use show ip ospf neighbor and show ip route clues carefully.

Key takeaway

OSPF neighbour adjacency depends on matching area, hello/dead timers, network type, and authentication — IP reachability alone is not enough.

Real-world example

How this comes up in practice

A network engineer at a university connects two campus buildings via a fibre link. Both routers run OSPF, but no adjacency forms — even though both routers can ping each other. The engineer finds one router is in area 0 and the other in area 1. OSPF adjacency requires matching area numbers, hello/dead timers, and network type. IP reachability alone is not enough.

What to study next

Got this wrong? Here's your next step.

Review OSPF neighbour requirements — matching area type, hello and dead timers, network type, stub flags, and authentication. Study show ip ospf neighbor states (INIT, 2-WAY, FULL). Then practise related 300-410 OSPF questions on adjacency and route selection.

Related practice questions

Related 300-410 practice-question pages

Use these pages to review the topic behind this question. This is how one missed question becomes focused revision.

Practice this exam

Start a free 300-410 practice session

Short sessions build daily habit. Longer sessions build exam-day stamina. Try a timed session to simulate real conditions.

FAQ

Questions learners often ask

What does this 300-410 question test?

OSPF Troubleshooting (v2/v3) — This question tests OSPF Troubleshooting (v2/v3) — OSPF neighbours must agree on key parameters..

What is the correct answer to this question?

The correct answer is: Router 10.1.1.2 is the DR on the segment 192.168.12.0/24. — The database shows router link states for three routers and one net link state. The net link state is advertised by 10.1.1.2, indicating it is the DR on the segment 192.168.12.0/24. The absence of other net link states suggests only one broadcast segment exists.

What should I do if I get this 300-410 question wrong?

Review OSPF neighbour requirements — matching area type, hello and dead timers, network type, stub flags, and authentication. Study show ip ospf neighbor states (INIT, 2-WAY, FULL). Then practise related 300-410 OSPF questions on adjacency and route selection.

What is the key concept behind this question?

OSPF neighbours must agree on key parameters.

About these practice questions

Courseiva creates original exam-style practice questions with explanations and wrong-answer analysis. It does not publish real exam questions, exam dumps, or protected exam content. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →

How Courseiva writes practice questions · Editorial policy

Same concept, more angles

1 more ways this is tested on 300-410

These questions test the same concept from different angles. Work through them to make sure you can recognise it however the exam phrases it.

Variation 1. A network engineer runs the following command on Router R1: R1# show ip ospf database router 10.1.1.2 OSPF Router with ID (10.1.1.1) (Process ID 1) Router Link States (Area 0) LS age: 150 Options: (No TOS-capability, DC) LS Type: Router Links Link State ID: 10.1.1.2 Advertising Router: 10.1.1.2 LS Seq Number: 80000002 Checksum: 0x1234 Length: 48 Number of Links: 2 Link connected to: a Transit Network (Link ID) Designated Router address: 192.168.12.2 (Link Data) Router Interface address: 192.168.12.2 Number of TOS metrics: 0 TOS 0 Metrics: 10 Link connected to: a Stub Network (Link ID) Network/subnet number: 10.2.2.0 (Link Data) Network Mask: 255.255.255.0 Number of TOS metrics: 0 TOS 0 Metrics: 10 Based on this output, which statement is correct?

hard
  • A.Router 10.1.1.2 is connected to a transit network and a stub network.
  • B.Router 10.1.1.2 is the DR on the transit network.
  • C.Router 10.1.1.2 has a cost of 20 to reach the stub network.
  • D.Router 10.1.1.2 is not advertising any external routes.

Why A: The router LSA from 10.1.1.2 shows two links: one transit network (to the DR address) and one stub network (10.2.2.0/24). The transit link indicates it is connected to a broadcast segment where it is the DR (since it lists its own interface address as DR address).

Last reviewed: Jun 18, 2026

Question Discussion

Share a tip, memory trick, or ask about the reasoning behind this question. Do not post real exam questions, leaked content, braindumps, or copyrighted exam material. Comments are moderated and may be removed without notice.

Loading comments…

Sign in to join the discussion.

This 300-410 practice question is part of Courseiva's free Cisco certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the 300-410 exam.