Courseiva
mediumMultiple Choice

300-410 Practice Question: Runs the following command on Router R1: R1# show…

A network engineer runs the following command on Router R1:

R1# show mpls l2transport vc 100 detail

Local interface: Gi0/0/0 up, line protocol up Destination: 10.0.0.2, VC ID: 100, VC status: down Last error: No remote LDP session

Based on this output, what is the most likely cause of the VC being down?

⚠ Common exam trap

300-410 often tests whether candidates can read the 'Last error' field literally — the trap is picking 'IP unreachable' because LDP depends on IP, but the output names the LDP session itself as the missing component.

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.

Correct answer & explanation

✓

The LDP session between the routers is not established.

The output explicitly states 'Last error: No remote LDP session,' which means the local router cannot establish an LDP session with the remote PE (10.0.0.2). In AToM (Any Transport over MPLS) / L2VPN pseudowire setups, the VC status depends on an operational LDP session between the two PEs to exchange VC labels. Without that LDP session, the VC cannot come up regardless of interface or VC ID configuration.

Answer analysis

Option-by-option breakdown

For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.

  • ✗

    The local interface Gi0/0/0 is administratively down.

    Why it's wrong here

    The output shows Gi0/0/0 as up with line protocol up, so it is not administratively down; the reported last error is no remote LDP session. The option is tempting because an interface problem would also bring the VC down, but the interface state here is already confirmed up.

  • ✗

    The remote router 10.0.0.2 is not reachable via IP.

    Why it's wrong here

    IP reachability to 10.0.0.2 is required for the targeted LDP session, but the error names the missing LDP session specifically, not an unreachable peer. If the destination were unreachable, the output would show no route or an LDP peer in a non-operational state.

  • ✓

    The LDP session between the routers is not established.

    Why this is correct

    The "No remote LDP session" error directly indicates that the targeted LDP session carrying the VC label binding has not formed between the PE routers. AToM pseudowires require a targeted LDP session to exchange VC labels, so without it the VC remains down regardless of interface state.

  • ✗

    The VC ID 100 is mismatched on the remote router.

    Why it's wrong here

    A VC ID mismatch produces a different error — typically 'VC ID mismatch' or a remote VC down state — not 'No remote LDP session'. The LDP session itself must form before VC ID negotiation occurs. VC ID matching is relevant once the session is established and labels are exchanged.

Go deeper

Related to this question

About these practice questions

This 300-410 question is part of Courseiva's 1,401-question bank — original exam-style content with full explanations and wrong-answer analysis, never real exam questions or exam dumps. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →

How Courseiva writes practice questions · Editorial policy

JA

Written and reviewed by Johnson Ajibi, MSc IT Security

Senior Network & Security Engineer · founder of Courseiva

Last reviewed September 2026 · checked against the official Cisco exam blueprint

This 300-410 practice question is part of Courseiva's free Cisco certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the 300-410 exam.