Courseiva
mediumMultiple ChoiceObjective-mapped

300-410 Practice Question: Examine the following partial MPLS configuration…

Examine the following partial MPLS configuration on a Cisco IOS-XE router:

interface GigabitEthernet0/0
 ip address 10.0.1.1 255.255.255.252

mpls ip mpls label protocol ldp !

router ospf 1
 network 10.0.1.0 0.0.0.3 area 0

! mpls ldp router-id Loopback0 force

What is the effect of this configuration?

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.

Correct answer & explanation

LDP will establish a session with the neighbor on GigabitEthernet0/0, using Loopback0 as the transport address.

The configuration enables LDP on the interface and globally via 'mpls ip'. The 'mpls label protocol ldp' is default but explicit. The 'mpls ldp router-id Loopback0 force' ensures LDP uses Loopback0 as the router ID, overriding any other interface. OSPF advertises the /30 link. This is a correct minimal MPLS configuration.

Answer analysis

Option-by-option breakdown

For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.

  • LDP will establish a session with the neighbor on GigabitEthernet0/0, using Loopback0 as the transport address.

    Why this is correct

    The 'mpls ldp router-id Loopback0 force' command forces LDP to use Loopback0 as the router ID, which becomes the transport address for LDP sessions. The 'mpls ip' on the interface enables label switching and LDP hello messages.

  • LDP will use the IP address of GigabitEthernet0/0 as the router ID because 'force' is not valid.

    Why it's wrong here

    The 'force' keyword is valid and overrides the default selection of the highest IP address. Without 'force', LDP might choose a different router ID if a higher IP appears later.

  • LDP sessions will fail because OSPF is not redistributed into LDP.

    Why it's wrong here

    LDP does not require redistribution of routing protocols; it uses the IGP routing table to establish label bindings for FECs. OSPF is sufficient for reachability.

  • MPLS forwarding will not occur because 'mpls label protocol ldp' is redundant and causes a conflict.

    Why it's wrong here

    The command is optional and does not cause conflict; it simply specifies the label distribution protocol. MPLS forwarding will work normally.

Visual reference

R1 R2 R3 R4 10 100 10 100 OSPF picks R1→R2→R4 (cost 20) over R1→R3→R4 (cost 200)

Quick reference

Routing Protocol Comparison

ProtocolMetricMax HopsAlgorithmType
RIP v2Hop count15Bellman-FordDistance vector
OSPFCost (bandwidth)UnlimitedDijkstra (SPF)Link state
EIGRPComposite metricUnlimitedDUALHybrid
IS-ISCostUnlimitedDijkstraLink state
BGPPolicy / attributesUnlimitedPath vectorPath vector

RIP's 15-hop limit makes it unsuitable for large networks. OSPF and EIGRP dominate modern enterprise deployments.

Go deeper

Related to this question

About these practice questions

This 300-410 question is part of Courseiva's 1,966-question bank — original exam-style content with full explanations and wrong-answer analysis, never real exam questions or exam dumps. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →

How Courseiva writes practice questions · Editorial policy

JA

Written by Johnson Ajibi, MSc IT Security

Senior Network & Security Engineer · founder of Courseiva

This 300-410 practice question is part of Courseiva's free Cisco certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the 300-410 exam.