Courseiva
mediumMultiple ChoiceObjective-mapped

300-410 Practice Question: Examine this MPLS configuration on a router: ip…

Examine this MPLS configuration on a router:

ip cef

!

interface GigabitEthernet0/0
 ip address 172.16.1.1 255.255.255.252

mpls ip !

interface GigabitEthernet0/1
 ip address 172.16.2.1 255.255.255.252

!

router eigrp 100
 network 172.16.0.0

! mpls ldp router-id Loopback0 force

What is the problem with this configuration?

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.

Correct answer & explanation

The 'mpls ldp router-id' command references Loopback0, but no loopback interface is configured, causing LDP to fail.

The LDP router-id is set to Loopback0, but Loopback0 is not configured. This will cause LDP to fail to establish a router ID, and LDP sessions will not form. Additionally, EIGRP is used but that is fine. The missing loopback interface is the key issue.

Answer analysis

Option-by-option breakdown

For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.

  • EIGRP is not supported with MPLS; OSPF or IS-IS must be used.

    Why it's wrong here

    EIGRP can be used with MPLS; any IGP that provides reachability works.

  • The 'mpls ldp router-id' command references Loopback0, but no loopback interface is configured, causing LDP to fail.

    Why this is correct

    If the specified router-id interface does not exist, LDP cannot determine its router ID and will not operate. A loopback must be created.

  • The 'mpls ip' command is missing on GigabitEthernet0/1, so MPLS will not work on that interface.

    Why it's wrong here

    While MPLS is only enabled on one interface, that is not necessarily a problem if only one neighbor is needed. The question asks for the problem; the missing loopback is more critical.

  • CEF must be enabled under each interface, not just globally.

    Why it's wrong here

    Global CEF enables CEF on all interfaces; no per-interface command is needed.

Quick reference

Routing Protocol Comparison

ProtocolMetricMax HopsAlgorithmType
RIP v2Hop count15Bellman-FordDistance vector
OSPFCost (bandwidth)UnlimitedDijkstra (SPF)Link state
EIGRPComposite metricUnlimitedDUALHybrid
IS-ISCostUnlimitedDijkstraLink state
BGPPolicy / attributesUnlimitedPath vectorPath vector

RIP's 15-hop limit makes it unsuitable for large networks. OSPF and EIGRP dominate modern enterprise deployments.

Go deeper

Related to this question

About these practice questions

One of 1,966 original 300-410 practice questions on Courseiva, each with a full explanation and wrong-answer analysis — not exam dumps or protected exam content. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →

How Courseiva writes practice questions · Editorial policy

JA

Written by Johnson Ajibi, MSc IT Security

Senior Network & Security Engineer · founder of Courseiva

This 300-410 practice question is part of Courseiva's free Cisco certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the 300-410 exam.