Question 1,544 of 2,152
MPLS OperationsmediumMultiple ChoiceObjective-mapped

300-410 MPLS Operations Practice Question

This 300-410 practice question tests your understanding of mpls operations. The scenario asks you to isolate a root cause — eliminate options that address a different problem before choosing. After answering, compare your reasoning against the explanation and wrong-answer breakdown below. Once you have made your selection, read the full explanation to reinforce the concept and understand why each distractor is designed to mislead on exam day.

Examine this MPLS configuration on a router:

ip cef

!

interface GigabitEthernet0/0
 ip address 172.16.1.1 255.255.255.252

mpls ip !

interface GigabitEthernet0/1
 ip address 172.16.2.1 255.255.255.252

!

router eigrp 100
 network 172.16.0.0

! mpls ldp router-id Loopback0 force

What is the problem with this configuration?

Question 1mediummultiple choice
Study the full EIGRP explanation →

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.

Correct answer & explanation

The 'mpls ldp router-id' command references Loopback0, but no loopback interface is configured, causing LDP to fail.

The LDP router-id is set to Loopback0, but Loopback0 is not configured. This will cause LDP to fail to establish a router ID, and LDP sessions will not form. Additionally, EIGRP is used but that is fine. The missing loopback interface is the key issue.

Key principle: OSPF neighbour adjacency depends on matching area, hello/dead timers, network type, and authentication — IP reachability alone is not enough.

Answer analysis

Option-by-option breakdown

For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.

  • EIGRP is not supported with MPLS; OSPF or IS-IS must be used.

    Why it's wrong here

    EIGRP can be used with MPLS; any IGP that provides reachability works.

  • The 'mpls ldp router-id' command references Loopback0, but no loopback interface is configured, causing LDP to fail.

    Why this is correct

    If the specified router-id interface does not exist, LDP cannot determine its router ID and will not operate. A loopback must be created.

    Related concept

    OSPF neighbours must agree on key parameters.

  • The 'mpls ip' command is missing on GigabitEthernet0/1, so MPLS will not work on that interface.

    Why it's wrong here

    While MPLS is only enabled on one interface, that is not necessarily a problem if only one neighbor is needed. The question asks for the problem; the missing loopback is more critical.

  • CEF must be enabled under each interface, not just globally.

    Why it's wrong here

    Global CEF enables CEF on all interfaces; no per-interface command is needed.

Common exam traps

Common exam trap: OSPF can fail even when IP connectivity looks correct

OSPF neighbour formation depends on matching areas, timers, network type, authentication and passive-interface behaviour. Do not choose an answer only because the devices can ping.

Trap categories for this question

  • Command / output trap

    Global CEF enables CEF on all interfaces; no per-interface command is needed.

Detailed technical explanation

How to think about this question

OSPF questions usually test the details that control adjacency and route selection. Read the neighbour state, area, router ID and interface configuration before deciding what is wrong.

KKey Concepts to Remember

  • OSPF neighbours must agree on key parameters.
  • Router ID selection can affect neighbour relationships and LSDB output.
  • OSPF cost influences the preferred path.
  • A route can appear in OSPF information but not become the installed route.

TExam Day Tips

  • Check area mismatch first when OSPF adjacency fails.
  • Review passive interfaces when a network is advertised but no neighbour forms.
  • Use show ip ospf neighbor and show ip route clues carefully.

Key takeaway

OSPF neighbour adjacency depends on matching area, hello/dead timers, network type, and authentication — IP reachability alone is not enough.

Real-world example

How this comes up in practice

A network engineer at a university connects two campus buildings via a fibre link. Both routers run OSPF, but no adjacency forms — even though both routers can ping each other. The engineer finds one router is in area 0 and the other in area 1. OSPF adjacency requires matching area numbers, hello/dead timers, and network type. IP reachability alone is not enough.

What to study next

Got this wrong? Here's your next step.

Review OSPF neighbour requirements — matching area type, hello and dead timers, network type, stub flags, and authentication. Study show ip ospf neighbor states (INIT, 2-WAY, FULL). Then practise related 300-410 OSPF questions on adjacency and route selection.

Related practice questions

Related 300-410 practice-question pages

Use these pages to review the topic behind this question. This is how one missed question becomes focused revision.

Practice this exam

Start a free 300-410 practice session

Short sessions build daily habit. Longer sessions build exam-day stamina. Try a timed session to simulate real conditions.

FAQ

Questions learners often ask

What does this 300-410 question test?

MPLS Operations — This question tests MPLS Operations — OSPF neighbours must agree on key parameters..

What is the correct answer to this question?

The correct answer is: The 'mpls ldp router-id' command references Loopback0, but no loopback interface is configured, causing LDP to fail. — The LDP router-id is set to Loopback0, but Loopback0 is not configured. This will cause LDP to fail to establish a router ID, and LDP sessions will not form. Additionally, EIGRP is used but that is fine. The missing loopback interface is the key issue.

What should I do if I get this 300-410 question wrong?

Review OSPF neighbour requirements — matching area type, hello and dead timers, network type, stub flags, and authentication. Study show ip ospf neighbor states (INIT, 2-WAY, FULL). Then practise related 300-410 OSPF questions on adjacency and route selection.

What is the key concept behind this question?

OSPF neighbours must agree on key parameters.

About these practice questions

Courseiva creates original exam-style practice questions with explanations and wrong-answer analysis. It does not publish real exam questions, exam dumps, or protected exam content. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →

How Courseiva writes practice questions · Editorial policy

Last reviewed: Jun 18, 2026

Question Discussion

Share a tip, memory trick, or ask about the reasoning behind this question. Do not post real exam questions, leaked content, braindumps, or copyrighted exam material. Comments are moderated and may be removed without notice.

Loading comments…

Sign in to join the discussion.

This 300-410 practice question is part of Courseiva's free Cisco certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the 300-410 exam.