Courseiva
hardMultiple ChoiceObjective-mapped

300-410 Practice Question: In an MPLS network, OSPF network type mismatch…

In an MPLS network, OSPF network type mismatch causes routing issues. Router R1 and R2 are connected via a multi-access Ethernet link. R1 has 'interface GigabitEthernet0/0 ip ospf network point-to-point', while R2 has default OSPF network type broadcast. R1 shows 'show ip ospf neighbor' output: 'Neighbor 10.0.0.2, interface address 10.0.0.2, state FULL' but 'show ip route' does not include routes from R2. What is the root cause?

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.

Correct answer & explanation

The OSPF network type mismatch causes R1 to ignore Type 2 LSAs from R2, preventing route installation.

OSPF network type mismatch on a multi-access link can cause adjacency to form but with different DR/BDR election behavior. With point-to-point on R1, it expects no DR/BDR, while broadcast on R2 expects DR election. The adjacency forms as FULL, but R1 does not accept routes from R2 because R2's LSA may have a different link type or R1 ignores them due to mismatch in network type handling.

Answer analysis

Option-by-option breakdown

For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.

  • The OSPF network type mismatch causes R1 to ignore Type 2 LSAs from R2, preventing route installation.

    Why this is correct

    Point-to-point network type does not process Type 2 (network) LSAs, so routes advertised by R2 via network LSA are ignored.

  • The MTU mismatch between R1 and R2 causes OSPF database synchronization failure.

    Why it's wrong here

    Adjacency is FULL, so database sync is complete.

  • R1 has a distribute-list blocking routes from R2.

    Why it's wrong here

    No distribute-list mentioned.

  • R2 is not advertising any routes; need 'network' statement.

    Why it's wrong here

    Routes are expected to be advertised.

Visual reference

R1 R2 R3 R4 10 100 10 100 OSPF picks R1→R2→R4 (cost 20) over R1→R3→R4 (cost 200)

Quick reference

Routing Protocol Comparison

ProtocolMetricMax HopsAlgorithmType
RIP v2Hop count15Bellman-FordDistance vector
OSPFCost (bandwidth)UnlimitedDijkstra (SPF)Link state
EIGRPComposite metricUnlimitedDUALHybrid
IS-ISCostUnlimitedDijkstraLink state
BGPPolicy / attributesUnlimitedPath vectorPath vector

RIP's 15-hop limit makes it unsuitable for large networks. OSPF and EIGRP dominate modern enterprise deployments.

About these practice questions

Courseiva writes every 300-410 question from scratch — 1,966 in total, each with an explanation and a wrong-answer breakdown. None are copied from real exams or dumps. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →

How Courseiva writes practice questions · Editorial policy

JA

Written by Johnson Ajibi, MSc IT Security

Senior Network & Security Engineer · founder of Courseiva

This 300-410 practice question is part of Courseiva's free Cisco certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the 300-410 exam.