- A
The path with lower MED is from a different AS, so MED is not compared.
MED is only compared between paths from the same AS. The path via 10.1.1.1 might have a different AS_PATH.
- B
The route-map on R1 is misconfigured; it should set metric on the neighbor statement.
Why wrong: Route-maps applied inbound are correct for setting MED.
- C
R2 has a higher local preference for the path via 10.1.1.4.
Why wrong: Local preference is not shown; the output indicates metric is the only difference.
- D
The 'bgp bestpath as-path multipath-relax' command causes MED to be ignored.
Why wrong: This command only affects multipath, not MED comparison.
300-410 Network Logging and Syslog Practice Question
This 300-410 practice question tests your understanding of network logging and syslog. Examine the command output carefully: the correct answer depends on what the output actually shows, not on general recall alone. After answering, compare your reasoning against the explanation and wrong-answer breakdown below. Once you have made your selection, read the full explanation to reinforce the concept and understand why each distractor is designed to mislead on exam day.
In an iBGP network, router R1 has:
router bgp 65000
bgp bestpath as-path multipath-relax
neighbor 10.1.1.2 route-map SET-MED in
route-map SET-MED permit 10 set metric 50
neighbor 10.1.1.3 route-map SET-MED2 in
route-map SET-MED2 permit 10 set metric 100
Router R2 shows: R2# show ip bgp 192.168.1.0/24
BGP routing table entry for 192.168.1.0/24, version 2 Paths: (2 available, best #2) Path #1: via 10.1.1.1, metric 50 Path #2: via 10.1.1.4, metric 100
R2# show ip route 192.168.1.0
Routing entry for 192.168.1.0/24 Known via "bgp 65000", distance 200, metric 100 Last update from 10.1.1.4 00:00:10 Serial0/0/1 R2 is choosing the path with higher metric. What is the root cause?
Clue words in this question
Noticing these words before you look at the options changes how you read each choice.
Clue:
"best"Why it matters: Signals that multiple options may be partially correct. Choose the option that most directly solves the exact problem described, not the one that sounds most complete.
Answer choices
Why each option matters
Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.
Correct answer & explanation
The path with lower MED is from a different AS, so MED is not compared.
BGP best path selection compares MED only if paths come from the same AS. If the paths have different AS_PATH lengths, MED is ignored. The output shows two paths, but the path via 10.1.1.1 might have a different AS_PATH length. The 'bgp bestpath as-path multipath-relax' allows multipath but does not affect MED comparison. The higher metric path is chosen due to a different tie-breaker (e.g., lower neighbor IP).
Key principle: OSPF neighbour adjacency depends on matching area, hello/dead timers, network type, and authentication — IP reachability alone is not enough.
Answer analysis
Option-by-option breakdown
For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.
- ✓
The path with lower MED is from a different AS, so MED is not compared.
Why this is correct
MED is only compared between paths from the same AS. The path via 10.1.1.1 might have a different AS_PATH.
Clue confirmation
The clue word "best" in the question point toward this answer.
Related concept
OSPF neighbours must agree on key parameters.
- ✗
The route-map on R1 is misconfigured; it should set metric on the neighbor statement.
Why it's wrong here
Route-maps applied inbound are correct for setting MED.
- ✗
R2 has a higher local preference for the path via 10.1.1.4.
Why it's wrong here
Local preference is not shown; the output indicates metric is the only difference.
- ✗
The 'bgp bestpath as-path multipath-relax' command causes MED to be ignored.
Why it's wrong here
This command only affects multipath, not MED comparison.
Common exam traps
Common exam trap: OSPF can fail even when IP connectivity looks correct
OSPF neighbour formation depends on matching areas, timers, network type, authentication and passive-interface behaviour. Do not choose an answer only because the devices can ping.
Trap categories for this question
Command / output trap
Local preference is not shown; the output indicates metric is the only difference.
Detailed technical explanation
How to think about this question
OSPF questions usually test the details that control adjacency and route selection. Read the neighbour state, area, router ID and interface configuration before deciding what is wrong.
KKey Concepts to Remember
- OSPF neighbours must agree on key parameters.
- Router ID selection can affect neighbour relationships and LSDB output.
- OSPF cost influences the preferred path.
- A route can appear in OSPF information but not become the installed route.
TExam Day Tips
- Check area mismatch first when OSPF adjacency fails.
- Review passive interfaces when a network is advertised but no neighbour forms.
- Use show ip ospf neighbor and show ip route clues carefully.
Key takeaway
OSPF neighbour adjacency depends on matching area, hello/dead timers, network type, and authentication — IP reachability alone is not enough.
Real-world example
How this comes up in practice
A network engineer at a university connects two campus buildings via a fibre link. Both routers run OSPF, but no adjacency forms — even though both routers can ping each other. The engineer finds one router is in area 0 and the other in area 1. OSPF adjacency requires matching area numbers, hello/dead timers, and network type. IP reachability alone is not enough.
What to study next
Got this wrong? Here's your next step.
Review OSPF neighbour requirements — matching area type, hello and dead timers, network type, stub flags, and authentication. Study show ip ospf neighbor states (INIT, 2-WAY, FULL). Then practise related 300-410 OSPF questions on adjacency and route selection.
- →
Network Logging and Syslog — study guide chapter
Learn the concepts, then practise the questions
- →
Network Logging and Syslog practice questions
Targeted practice on this topic area only
- →
All 300-410 questions
2,152 questions across all exam domains
- →
Cisco CCNP ENARSI 300-410 study guide
Full concept coverage aligned to exam objectives
- →
300-410 practice test guide
How to use practice tests most effectively before exam day
Related practice questions
Related 300-410 practice-question pages
Use these pages to review the topic behind this question. This is how one missed question becomes focused revision.
Layer 3 Technologies practice questions
Practise 300-410 questions linked to Layer 3 Technologies.
EIGRP Troubleshooting practice questions
Practise 300-410 questions linked to EIGRP Troubleshooting.
OSPF Troubleshooting (v2/v3) practice questions
Practise 300-410 questions linked to OSPF Troubleshooting (v2/v3).
BGP Troubleshooting practice questions
Practise 300-410 questions linked to BGP Troubleshooting.
Route Redistribution practice questions
Practise 300-410 questions linked to Route Redistribution.
Policy-Based Routing (PBR) practice questions
Practise 300-410 questions linked to Policy-Based Routing (PBR).
VRF-Lite practice questions
Practise 300-410 questions linked to VRF-Lite.
Route Maps and Route Filtering practice questions
Practise 300-410 questions linked to Route Maps and Route Filtering.
Administrative Distance practice questions
Practise 300-410 questions linked to Administrative Distance.
Route Summarization practice questions
Practise 300-410 questions linked to Route Summarization.
Bidirectional Forwarding Detection (BFD) practice questions
Practise 300-410 questions linked to Bidirectional Forwarding Detection (BFD).
VPN Technologies practice questions
Practise 300-410 questions linked to VPN Technologies.
Practice this exam
Start a free 300-410 practice session
Short sessions build daily habit. Longer sessions build exam-day stamina. Try a timed session to simulate real conditions.
FAQ
Questions learners often ask
What does this 300-410 question test?
Network Logging and Syslog — This question tests Network Logging and Syslog — OSPF neighbours must agree on key parameters..
What is the correct answer to this question?
The correct answer is: The path with lower MED is from a different AS, so MED is not compared. — BGP best path selection compares MED only if paths come from the same AS. If the paths have different AS_PATH lengths, MED is ignored. The output shows two paths, but the path via 10.1.1.1 might have a different AS_PATH length. The 'bgp bestpath as-path multipath-relax' allows multipath but does not affect MED comparison. The higher metric path is chosen due to a different tie-breaker (e.g., lower neighbor IP).
What should I do if I get this 300-410 question wrong?
Review OSPF neighbour requirements — matching area type, hello and dead timers, network type, stub flags, and authentication. Study show ip ospf neighbor states (INIT, 2-WAY, FULL). Then practise related 300-410 OSPF questions on adjacency and route selection.
Are there clue words in this question I should notice?
Yes — watch for: "best". Signals that multiple options may be partially correct. Choose the option that most directly solves the exact problem described, not the one that sounds most complete.
What is the key concept behind this question?
OSPF neighbours must agree on key parameters.
About these practice questions
Courseiva creates original exam-style practice questions with explanations and wrong-answer analysis. It does not publish real exam questions, exam dumps, or protected exam content. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →
Last reviewed: Jun 18, 2026
This 300-410 practice question is part of Courseiva's free Cisco certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the 300-410 exam.
Question Discussion
Share a tip, memory trick, or ask about the reasoning behind this question. Do not post real exam questions, leaked content, braindumps, or copyrighted exam material. Comments are moderated and may be removed without notice.
Sign in to join the discussion.