Courseiva
Question 1,080 of 2,011
mediumMultiple ChoiceObjective-mapped

300-410 Practice Question: Consider the following configuration: ipv6…

Consider the following configuration:

ipv6 access-list FILTER

permit ipv6 2001:db8:3::/48 any
 deny ipv6 any any

interface GigabitEthernet0/5

ipv6 traffic-filter FILTER in ipv6 verify unicast source reachable-via rx

A packet arrives on GigabitEthernet0/5 with source 2001:db8:3::100 and destination 2001:db8:4::1. The route for 2001:db8:3::/48 points out interface GigabitEthernet0/6. What happens?

⚠ Common exam trap

Cisco often tests the order of operations: uRPF is checked before ACLs, so candidates mistakenly think the ACL permit will allow the packet, but uRPF drops it first.

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.

Correct answer & explanation

The packet is dropped by uRPF because strict mode requires the source to be reachable via the receiving interface.

The packet is dropped by uRPF (unicast Reverse Path Forwarding) in strict mode because the `ipv6 verify unicast source reachable-via rx` command checks that the source address 2001:db8:3::100 is reachable via the receiving interface (GigabitEthernet0/5). The route for the source prefix 2001:db8:3::48 points out GigabitEthernet0/6, not the receiving interface, so uRPF fails and drops the packet before the ACL is evaluated.

Answer analysis

Option-by-option breakdown

For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.

  • The packet is permitted because the ACL matches and uRPF is not applied.

    Why it's wrong here

    uRPF is applied; both ACL and uRPF must pass.

  • The packet is dropped by uRPF because strict mode requires the source to be reachable via the receiving interface.

    Why this is correct

    Strict uRPF (rx) fails because the return route uses a different interface.

  • The packet is dropped by the ACL because the deny statement blocks all traffic.

    Why it's wrong here

    The permit statement matches the source prefix, so the ACL permits the packet.

  • The packet is permitted because uRPF only checks destination addresses.

    Why it's wrong here

    uRPF checks the source address, not the destination.

Visual reference

Source Router + ACL permit 10.0.0.0/8 deny any Server 10.0.0.5 ✓ 192.168.1.1 ✗ dropped ACLs evaluate top-down; first match wins — implicit deny all at end

About these practice questions

Courseiva creates original exam-style practice questions with explanations and wrong-answer analysis. It does not publish real exam questions, exam dumps, or protected exam content. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →

How Courseiva writes practice questions · Editorial policy

Last reviewed: Jul 4, 2026

Question Discussion

Share a tip, memory trick, or ask about the reasoning behind this question. Do not post real exam questions, leaked content, braindumps, or copyrighted exam material. Comments are moderated and may be removed without notice.

Loading comments…

Sign in to join the discussion.

This 300-410 practice question is part of Courseiva's free Cisco certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the 300-410 exam.