When designing incident response playbooks, which THREE of the following are considered best practices for maintaining security and operational continuity?
Comprehensive logging of every workflow execution step preserves an audit trail of automated actions, enabling post-incident review and troubleshooting. This supports operational continuity by making playbook behaviour traceable, satisfying the stem's requirement to maintain security and continuity during incident response.
Why this answer
Option B is correct because comprehensive logging of every workflow execution step provides the audit trail and forensic evidence needed to trace actions during an incident, verify playbook behavior, and support post-incident reviews and compliance requirements. Option D is correct because dedicated service accounts scoped with least privilege limit the blast radius if a playbook or its credentials are compromised, preventing lateral movement and unauthorized access to unrelated systems. Option E is correct because modular, reusable playbooks reduce duplication and maintenance overhead, allow consistent response procedures across different incident types, and enable faster adaptation when new threats emerge.
Option A is not a best practice because running playbooks only in Production without staging validation risks untested automation causing outages or destructive actions. Option C is not a best practice because sharing administrative credentials in plaintext destroys accountability, violates least privilege and separation of duties, and exposes privileged access to anyone who sees the text.
Exam trap
SCAZT often tests the misconception that automation should run directly in production without staging, or that sharing credentials is acceptable for speed.