Question 220 of 505
Infrastructure and AutomationhardMultiple SelectObjective-mapped

200-901 Infrastructure and Automation Practice Question

This 200-901 practice question tests your understanding of infrastructure and automation. Read the scenario carefully and evaluate each option against the stated constraints before committing to an answer. After answering, compare your reasoning against the explanation and wrong-answer breakdown below. Once you have made your selection, read the full explanation to reinforce the concept and understand why each distractor is designed to mislead on exam day.

Which THREE practices help ensure idempotent network automation? (Select three)

Question 1hardmulti select
Full question →

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.

Correct answer & explanation

Using the 'state' parameter in Ansible modules to define desired state

Option A is correct because using the 'state' parameter in Ansible modules (e.g., 'state: present' or 'state: absent') explicitly declares the desired end state of a resource. This allows the module to compare the current state against the desired state and only make changes if necessary, ensuring that running the playbook multiple times produces the same result without unintended side effects.

Key principle: Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.

Answer analysis

Option-by-option breakdown

For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.

  • Using the 'state' parameter in Ansible modules to define desired state

    Why this is correct

    This ensures the module only takes action if the current state does not match the desired state.

    Related concept

    Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.

  • Using a transactional approach (e.g., configure candidate and commit)

    Why this is correct

    Transactions allow atomic changes and easy rollback, ensuring consistency.

    Related concept

    Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.

  • Running commands multiple times to ensure they are applied

    Why it's wrong here

    Repeating commands can cause errors on subsequent runs and is not idempotent.

  • Checking the current state before applying changes

    Why this is correct

    Pre-checks prevent unnecessary changes and reduce side effects.

    Related concept

    Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.

  • Always appending new configuration commands to the running config

    Why it's wrong here

    Appending can lead to duplicate entries and is not idempotent.

Common exam traps

Common exam trap: answer the scenario, not the keyword

Cisco often tests the misconception that simply running a command multiple times or appending configuration ensures idempotency, when in fact true idempotency requires state checking and declarative desired-state definitions.

Trap categories for this question

  • Command / output trap

    Repeating commands can cause errors on subsequent runs and is not idempotent.

Detailed technical explanation

How to think about this question

Idempotent network automation relies on declarative models where the automation tool (e.g., Ansible, NAPALM) retrieves the current device state via NETCONF or CLI, compares it to the desired state, and applies only the necessary deltas. For example, using 'state: merged' in Ansible's ios_config module ensures that if a VLAN already exists with the correct parameters, no change is made, whereas 'state: replaced' would remove any non-specified parameters. This contrasts with imperative scripts that blindly push commands, which can cause failures or configuration drift over multiple runs.

KKey Concepts to Remember

  • Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.
  • Find the constraint that changes the correct option.
  • Eliminate answers that are true in general but not in this case.

TExam Day Tips

  • Watch for words such as best, first, most likely and least administrative effort.
  • Review why wrong options are wrong, not only why the correct option is correct.

Key takeaway

Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.

Real-world example

How this comes up in practice

A practitioner preparing for the 200-901 exam encounters this exact type of scenario on the job. The correct answer here is not the most general option — it is the best answer for the specific constraint described. Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option. Real exam questions reward reading the full scenario before eliminating options, because the constraint defines which answer fits.

What to study next

Got this wrong? Here's your next step.

Identify which exam domain this question belongs to, review the core concept, then practise similar questions from the same domain.

Related practice questions

Related 200-901 practice-question pages

Use these pages to review the topic behind this question. This is how one missed question becomes focused revision.

Practice this exam

Start a free 200-901 practice session

Short sessions build daily habit. Longer sessions build exam-day stamina. Try a timed session to simulate real conditions.

FAQ

Questions learners often ask

What does this 200-901 question test?

Infrastructure and Automation — This question tests Infrastructure and Automation — Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer..

What is the correct answer to this question?

The correct answer is: Using the 'state' parameter in Ansible modules to define desired state — Option A is correct because using the 'state' parameter in Ansible modules (e.g., 'state: present' or 'state: absent') explicitly declares the desired end state of a resource. This allows the module to compare the current state against the desired state and only make changes if necessary, ensuring that running the playbook multiple times produces the same result without unintended side effects.

What should I do if I get this 200-901 question wrong?

Identify which exam domain this question belongs to, review the core concept, then practise similar questions from the same domain.

What is the key concept behind this question?

Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.

About these practice questions

Courseiva creates original exam-style practice questions with explanations and wrong-answer analysis. It does not publish real exam questions, exam dumps, or protected exam content. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →

How Courseiva writes practice questions · Editorial policy

Last reviewed: Jun 24, 2026

Question Discussion

Share a tip, memory trick, or ask about the reasoning behind this question. Do not post real exam questions, leaked content, braindumps, or copyrighted exam material. Comments are moderated and may be removed without notice.

Loading comments…

Sign in to join the discussion.

This 200-901 practice question is part of Courseiva's free Cisco certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the 200-901 exam.