Question 57 of 505
Infrastructure and AutomationhardMultiple SelectObjective-mapped

200-901 Infrastructure and Automation Practice Question

This 200-901 practice question tests your understanding of infrastructure and automation. This is a configuration task: choose the command set that satisfies every stated requirement. Small differences — like 'secret' vs 'password' or 'transport input ssh' vs 'all' — change whether the answer is correct. After answering, compare your reasoning against the explanation and wrong-answer breakdown below. Once you have made your selection, read the full explanation to reinforce the concept and understand why each distractor is designed to mislead on exam day.

When implementing network automation with Cisco devices, which THREE practices help ensure idempotency? (Select THREE)

Question 1hardmulti select
Full question →

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.

Correct answer & explanation

Performing a full configuration replace using RESTCONF PUT instead of PATCH.

Option C is correct because a full configuration replace using RESTCONF PUT ensures idempotency by setting the entire configuration to a known state, regardless of the current state. Unlike PATCH, which applies incremental changes that may behave differently depending on the existing configuration, PUT overwrites the entire resource, guaranteeing the same result every time it is executed.

Key principle: Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.

Answer analysis

Option-by-option breakdown

For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.

  • Writing scripts that only push incremental configurations.

    Why it's wrong here

    Incremental pushes may not be idempotent without state awareness.

  • Relying on manual rollback procedures after automation failures.

    Why it's wrong here

    Manual rollback does not ensure idempotent automation.

  • Performing a full configuration replace using RESTCONF PUT instead of PATCH.

    Why this is correct

    PUT replaces the whole resource, making it idempotent; PATCH is not necessarily idempotent.

    Related concept

    Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.

  • Using Ansible modules that check the current state before making changes.

    Why this is correct

    State-checking modules ensure changes are only applied when needed.

    Related concept

    Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.

  • Using declarative automation tools like Puppet that enforce desired state.

    Why this is correct

    Declarative tools model the desired state and achieve it regardless of current state.

    Related concept

    Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.

Common exam traps

Common exam trap: answer the scenario, not the keyword

Cisco often tests the misconception that incremental changes (like PATCH or partial configs) are idempotent, but the trap here is that only full-state replacement or state-checking tools guarantee the same result on every execution, regardless of the starting configuration.

Detailed technical explanation

How to think about this question

Idempotency in network automation is formally defined in RFC 7231 for HTTP methods: PUT is idempotent because multiple identical requests result in the same server state, whereas PATCH is not guaranteed to be idempotent unless the patch document is designed to be. In practice, using NETCONF with the <edit-config> operation and the 'replace' option also achieves idempotency by replacing the entire configuration subtree, similar to RESTCONF PUT. A real-world scenario is when a network device's configuration drifts due to manual changes; a full replace ensures the automation returns the device to the exact intended state, avoiding cumulative errors from incremental pushes.

KKey Concepts to Remember

  • Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.
  • Find the constraint that changes the correct option.
  • Eliminate answers that are true in general but not in this case.

TExam Day Tips

  • Watch for words such as best, first, most likely and least administrative effort.
  • Review why wrong options are wrong, not only why the correct option is correct.

Key takeaway

Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.

Real-world example

How this comes up in practice

A small business has 20 workstations on the 192.168.1.0/24 network and one public IP from its ISP. The router uses PAT (NAT overload) so all 20 devices share one public address using different source ports. NAT questions test whether you understand the four address terms and which direction each translation applies.

What to study next

Got this wrong? Here's your next step.

Identify which exam domain this question belongs to, review the core concept, then practise similar questions from the same domain.

Related practice questions

Related 200-901 practice-question pages

Use these pages to review the topic behind this question. This is how one missed question becomes focused revision.

Practice this exam

Start a free 200-901 practice session

Short sessions build daily habit. Longer sessions build exam-day stamina. Try a timed session to simulate real conditions.

FAQ

Questions learners often ask

What does this 200-901 question test?

Infrastructure and Automation — This question tests Infrastructure and Automation — Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer..

What is the correct answer to this question?

The correct answer is: Performing a full configuration replace using RESTCONF PUT instead of PATCH. — Option C is correct because a full configuration replace using RESTCONF PUT ensures idempotency by setting the entire configuration to a known state, regardless of the current state. Unlike PATCH, which applies incremental changes that may behave differently depending on the existing configuration, PUT overwrites the entire resource, guaranteeing the same result every time it is executed.

What should I do if I get this 200-901 question wrong?

Identify which exam domain this question belongs to, review the core concept, then practise similar questions from the same domain.

What is the key concept behind this question?

Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.

About these practice questions

Courseiva creates original exam-style practice questions with explanations and wrong-answer analysis. It does not publish real exam questions, exam dumps, or protected exam content. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →

How Courseiva writes practice questions · Editorial policy

Keep practising

More 200-901 practice questions

Last reviewed: Jun 24, 2026

Question Discussion

Share a tip, memory trick, or ask about the reasoning behind this question. Do not post real exam questions, leaked content, braindumps, or copyrighted exam material. Comments are moderated and may be removed without notice.

Loading comments…

Sign in to join the discussion.

This 200-901 practice question is part of Courseiva's free Cisco certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the 200-901 exam.