hardMultiple ChoiceObjective-mapped
200-901 Practice Question: Refer to the exhibit
Exhibit
from flask import Flask, request, jsonify
import jwt
app = Flask(__name__)
app.config['SECRET_KEY'] = 'my-secret'
@app.route('/login', methods=['POST'])
def login():
username = request.json.get('username')
password = request.json.get('password')
# Verify username/password (omitted)
token = jwt.encode({'user': username}, app.config['SECRET_KEY'], algorithm='HS256')
return jsonify({'token': token})
@app.route('/protected', methods=['GET'])
def protected():
token = request.headers.get('Authorization')
if not token:
return jsonify({'msg': 'Missing token'}), 401
try:
# token format: "Bearer <token>"
token = token.split()[1]
data = jwt.decode(token, app.config['SECRET_KEY'], algorithms=['HS256'])
return jsonify({'msg': 'Access granted', 'user': data['user']})
except:
return jsonify({'msg': 'Invalid token'}), 401Refer to the exhibit. A security audit reveals that the authentication mechanism is vulnerable. Which attack is most likely possible?
⚠ Common exam trap
Cisco often tests the distinction between attacks that target the authentication mechanism itself (like token forgery) versus attacks that exploit input handling (XSS, SQLi) or transport security (MITM), leading candidates to pick a wrong option because they focus on a general security flaw (e.g., missing HTTPS) rather than the specific vulnerability implied by the token's weak secret.
Answer choices
Why each option matters
Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.
Correct answer & explanation
✓
Token forgery if the secret key is weak.
The exhibit shows a JSON Web Token (JWT) being used for authentication. If the secret key used to sign the JWT is weak or easily guessable, an attacker can forge a valid token by brute-forcing the secret and then crafting a token with arbitrary claims (e.g., elevated privileges). This is a classic token forgery attack, not a cross-site scripting or injection attack, because the vulnerability lies in the signing mechanism, not in input handling or transport security.
Answer analysis
Option-by-option breakdown
For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.
- ✗
Cross-site scripting (XSS) via the token.
Why it's wrong here
The token is not rendered in HTML; XSS is not indicated.
- ✓
Token forgery if the secret key is weak.
Why this is correct
The weak secret 'my-secret' can be easily guessed, allowing attacker to forge valid tokens.
- ✗
Man-in-the-middle attack due to missing HTTPS.
Why it's wrong here
While HTTPS is important, the exhibit does not show it missing, and the audit identified the secret key issue.
- ✗
SQL injection through the login endpoint.
Why it's wrong here
No SQL database interaction is shown; it's just a demonstration.
Go deeper
Related to this question
About these practice questions
One of 989 original 200-901 practice questions on Courseiva, each with a full explanation and wrong-answer analysis — not exam dumps or protected exam content. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →
JA
Written by Johnson Ajibi, MSc IT Security
Senior Network & Security Engineer · founder of Courseiva
This 200-901 practice question is part of Courseiva's free Cisco certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the 200-901 exam.