hardMultiple SelectObjective-mapped
Tuning Snort Signatures to Reduce False Positives — Exceptions, Thresholds, IPs
An analyst is investigating an alert triggered by a Snort rule that matches traffic on port 445 (SMB). The analyst sees that the signature has a high false positive rate. Which THREE factors should the analyst evaluate to tune the signature for better accuracy? (Choose three.)
Quick Answer
The answer is adding specific destination IP addresses of legitimate SMB servers, along with creating rule exceptions for internal subnets and tuning threshold values. This is correct because tuning Snort signatures to reduce false positives requires distinguishing between benign and malicious traffic on the same port; by whitelisting known internal SMB servers, the rule ignores expected file-sharing activity and only alerts on anomalous external connections, directly addressing the high false positive rate. On the Cisco CyberOps Associate 200-201 exam, this concept tests your ability to apply signature tuning techniques like exceptions, thresholds, and IP whitelisting—a common trap is disabling the rule entirely instead of refining it, or confusing source and destination IPs. Remember the mnemonic “DET” for Destination IPs, Exceptions, and Thresholds to recall the three tuning factors that improve accuracy without sacrificing detection.
⚠ Common exam trap
Cisco often tests the distinction between tuning an existing signature (e.g., adding exceptions or thresholds) versus implementing entirely new detection methods (e.g., behavioral analysis), which leads candidates to mistakenly select options that propose changing the detection approach rather than refining the rule.
Answer choices
Why each option matters
Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.
Correct answer & explanation
✓
Creating a rule exception for internal subnets that use SMB for file sharing.
Creating a rule exception for internal subnets that legitimately use SMB for file sharing reduces false positives by excluding known benign traffic. This allows the Snort rule to focus on external or anomalous SMB traffic on port 445, improving detection accuracy without disabling the rule entirely.
Answer analysis
Option-by-option breakdown
For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.
- ✗
Implementing a behavioral analysis heuristic to detect anomalous SMB activity.
Why it's wrong here
Snort is signature-based; behavioral analysis is not a tuning method.
- ✗
Disabling the rule to eliminate false positives.
Why it's wrong here
Disabling removes detection entirely, not a tuning approach.
- ✓
Creating a rule exception for internal subnets that use SMB for file sharing.
Why this is correct
Exceptions for known benign traffic improve accuracy.
- ✓
Adjusting the detection threshold to only alert when a certain number of SMB events occur within a time window.
Why this is correct
Threshold-based tuning can reduce false positives from low-rate legitimate traffic.
- ✓
Adding specific destination IP addresses of legitimate SMB servers.
Why this is correct
Whitelisting known servers reduces false positives.
Visual reference
Go deeper
Related to this question
About these practice questions
One of 979 original 200-201 practice questions on Courseiva, each with a full explanation and wrong-answer analysis — not exam dumps or protected exam content. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →
Same concept, more angles
1 more way this is tested on 200-201
These questions test the same concept from different angles. Work through them to make sure you can recognise it however the exam phrases it.
Variation 1. An IDS generates an alert for a signature that matches HTTP traffic containing 'cmd.exe' in the URI. The analyst checks the packet and sees the URI is actually 'cmd.exe?help'. What should the analyst do?
easy- A.Block the source IP
- ✓ B.Tune the signature to reduce false positives
- C.Disable the signature
- D.Escalate to incident response
Why B: The IDS signature triggered on the presence of 'cmd.exe' in the URI, but the actual traffic was 'cmd.exe?help', which is a legitimate help request and not an exploitation attempt. Tuning the signature to account for the query string reduces false positives without losing detection capability for actual attacks. This aligns with best practices for IDS management, where signatures are adjusted to match real threat patterns rather than exact strings.
JA
Written by Johnson Ajibi, MSc IT Security
Senior Network & Security Engineer · founder of Courseiva
This 200-201 practice question is part of Courseiva's free Cisco certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the 200-201 exam.