Question 413 of 507
Security ConceptshardMultiple ChoiceObjective-mapped

Quick Answer

The answer is to assume the red team is acting out of scope and contact the red team lead for clarification. This is correct because red team incident response procedures prioritize verification over immediate containment; the activity used a known red team tool and originated from an authorized server, but the timing mismatch—occurring outside the scheduled phase—creates ambiguity that must be resolved before escalating. On the Cisco CyberOps Associate 200-201 exam, this scenario tests your understanding of the incident response process, specifically the importance of confirming scope and intent during authorized testing to avoid false positives or disrupting a legitimate exercise. A common trap is to treat the alert as a real breach due to the severity of hash dumping, but the presence of a red team tool and source IP within scope demands a coordination check first. Remember the mnemonic “Verify Before You Vilify” to reinforce that when authorized testing is active, always clarify deviations with the red team lead before assuming malicious intent.

200-201 Security Concepts Practice Question

This 200-201 practice question tests your understanding of security concepts. Compare every option against the stated constraints before choosing — the best answer satisfies all requirements, not just the most obvious one. After answering, compare your reasoning against the explanation and wrong-answer breakdown below. Once you have made your selection, read the full explanation to reinforce the concept and understand why each distractor is designed to mislead on exam day.

A cybersecurity firm is conducting a red team exercise for a client. The red team successfully gained access to the client's internal network through a phishing email and escalated privileges to domain administrator. During the exercise, the red team uses a tool to dump password hashes from the domain controller. The client's security team detects the hash dump activity and sends an alert to the SOC. The SOC analyst reviews the alert and sees that the source IP of the hash dump is from a server that is part of the red team's scope. However, the red team is not scheduled to perform hash dumping until the next phase. The analyst also notes that the activity uses a known red team tool. Which of the following actions is most appropriate?

Question 1hardmultiple choice
Full question →

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.

Correct answer & explanation

Assume the red team is acting out of scope and contact the red team lead for clarification.

Option B is correct because the red team is authorized to operate within the client's environment, but the activity occurred outside the scheduled phase, creating ambiguity. The most appropriate action is to contact the red team lead for clarification to determine if the hash dump was a deviation from the plan or a sign of a real attacker. This aligns with incident response best practices, which prioritize verification before escalation, especially when authorized testing is in progress.

Key principle: Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.

Answer analysis

Option-by-option breakdown

For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.

  • Launch a full incident response procedure assuming a real attacker.

    Why it's wrong here

    This would be an overreaction and could waste resources if it is actually the red team.

  • Assume the red team is acting out of scope and contact the red team lead for clarification.

    Why this is correct

    Given the source IP belongs to the red team and the tool is known, it is likely a schedule mismatch; contacting the lead is the best course.

    Related concept

    Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.

  • Treat the alert as a false positive because the red team is authorized.

    Why it's wrong here

    Ignoring the alert could allow a real attacker to hide if the red team is not actually performing the activity.

  • Immediately block the red team's IP addresses and escalate to management.

    Why it's wrong here

    This could disrupt the authorized exercise and damage the client relationship if the red team is acting within scope.

Common exam traps

Common exam trap: answer the scenario, not the keyword

Cisco often tests the concept that authorized red team activity can still be out of scope, and the trap is assuming that any activity from an authorized IP is automatically benign, leading candidates to choose Option C instead of verifying with the red team lead.

Detailed technical explanation

How to think about this question

In red team exercises, scope and rules of engagement (RoE) define exactly when and how tools like Mimikatz or secretsdump.py can be used to dump password hashes from a domain controller via LSASS or NTDS.dit. The SOC analyst must correlate the source IP, tool signature, and timing against the RoE to distinguish between authorized testing and a real attacker. A common subtlety is that red teams may use Cobalt Strike or other frameworks that mimic real attacker behavior, making it critical to have a communication channel (e.g., a dedicated phone line or chat) for real-time deconfliction.

KKey Concepts to Remember

  • Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.
  • Find the constraint that changes the correct option.
  • Eliminate answers that are true in general but not in this case.

TExam Day Tips

  • Watch for words such as best, first, most likely and least administrative effort.
  • Review why wrong options are wrong, not only why the correct option is correct.

Key takeaway

Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.

Real-world example

How this comes up in practice

A junior network technician can log in to a core router but cannot reach the enable prompt or configuration mode. The AAA server is authenticating the login — but the authorisation policy only grants privilege level 1, not 15. Authentication (who you are) is working; authorisation (what you can do) is not.

What to study next

Got this wrong? Here's your next step.

Identify which exam domain this question belongs to, review the core concept, then practise similar questions from the same domain.

Related practice questions

Related 200-201 practice-question pages

Use these pages to review the topic behind this question. This is how one missed question becomes focused revision.

Practice this exam

Start a free 200-201 practice session

Short sessions build daily habit. Longer sessions build exam-day stamina. Try a timed session to simulate real conditions.

FAQ

Questions learners often ask

What does this 200-201 question test?

Security Concepts — This question tests Security Concepts — Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer..

What is the correct answer to this question?

The correct answer is: Assume the red team is acting out of scope and contact the red team lead for clarification. — Option B is correct because the red team is authorized to operate within the client's environment, but the activity occurred outside the scheduled phase, creating ambiguity. The most appropriate action is to contact the red team lead for clarification to determine if the hash dump was a deviation from the plan or a sign of a real attacker. This aligns with incident response best practices, which prioritize verification before escalation, especially when authorized testing is in progress.

What should I do if I get this 200-201 question wrong?

Identify which exam domain this question belongs to, review the core concept, then practise similar questions from the same domain.

What is the key concept behind this question?

Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.

About these practice questions

Courseiva creates original exam-style practice questions with explanations and wrong-answer analysis. It does not publish real exam questions, exam dumps, or protected exam content. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →

How Courseiva writes practice questions · Editorial policy

Last reviewed: Jun 25, 2026

Question Discussion

Share a tip, memory trick, or ask about the reasoning behind this question. Do not post real exam questions, leaked content, braindumps, or copyrighted exam material. Comments are moderated and may be removed without notice.

Loading comments…

Sign in to join the discussion.

This 200-201 practice question is part of Courseiva's free Cisco certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the 200-201 exam.