Question 206 of 507
Security Policies and ProcedureshardMultiple ChoiceObjective-mapped

Quick Answer

The correct answer is to investigate whether these are legitimate SSH attempts from authorized remote administrators. This is because logs showing multiple SSH attempts do not automatically indicate an attack; they could reflect routine administrative access, especially in environments with automated scripts or remote teams. The immediate priority is to correlate the source IPs, timestamps, and usernames against known authorized users and maintenance windows before taking any blocking action. On the Cisco CyberOps Associate 200-201 exam, this scenario tests your understanding of the “investigate before acting” principle within the NIST incident response framework, specifically the identification phase. A common trap is to jump to blocking all traffic (Option A) or disabling SSH (Option C), but the exam emphasizes that premature action can disrupt legitimate operations and destroy forensic evidence. Remember the mnemonic “Look Before You Lock” — always verify the source and intent of SSH attempts before implementing any access controls.

200-201 Security Policies and Procedures Practice Question

This 200-201 practice question tests your understanding of security policies and procedures. Read the scenario carefully and evaluate each option against the stated constraints before committing to an answer. After answering, compare your reasoning against the explanation and wrong-answer breakdown below. Once you have made your selection, read the full explanation to reinforce the concept and understand why each distractor is designed to mislead on exam day.

Exhibit

Refer to the exhibit.

%SEC-6-IPACCESSLOGP: list INBOUND denied tcp 10.0.0.1(12345) -> 192.168.1.1(22), 1 packet
%SEC-6-IPACCESSLOGP: list INBOUND denied tcp 10.0.0.2(54321) -> 192.168.1.1(22), 1 packet
%SEC-6-IPACCESSLOGP: list INBOUND denied tcp 10.0.0.3(11111) -> 192.168.1.1(22), 1 packet
%SEC-6-IPACCESSLOGP: list INBOUND denied tcp 10.0.0.4(22222) -> 192.168.1.1(22), 1 packet

An analyst sees these logs. What should be the immediate course of action?

Question 1hardmultiple choice
Full question →

Exhibit

Refer to the exhibit.

%SEC-6-IPACCESSLOGP: list INBOUND denied tcp 10.0.0.1(12345) -> 192.168.1.1(22), 1 packet
%SEC-6-IPACCESSLOGP: list INBOUND denied tcp 10.0.0.2(54321) -> 192.168.1.1(22), 1 packet
%SEC-6-IPACCESSLOGP: list INBOUND denied tcp 10.0.0.3(11111) -> 192.168.1.1(22), 1 packet
%SEC-6-IPACCESSLOGP: list INBOUND denied tcp 10.0.0.4(22222) -> 192.168.1.1(22), 1 packet

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.

Correct answer & explanation

Investigate whether these are legitimate SSH attempts from authorized remote administrators.

Option B is correct because the attempts could be from authorized admins; investigation is needed. Option A is premature. Option C is too aggressive. Option D is not a solution. Option E is extreme.

Key principle: Count usable hosts — not total addresses — and remember that the network and broadcast addresses are not available to hosts in standard IPv4 subnets.

Answer analysis

Option-by-option breakdown

For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.

  • Investigate whether these are legitimate SSH attempts from authorized remote administrators.

    Why this is correct

    Verify before acting.

    Related concept

    CIDR notation defines the prefix length.

  • Change the SSH port to a non-standard port.

    Why it's wrong here

    Does not address the source.

  • Block all traffic from the 10.0.0.0/24 subnet.

    Why it's wrong here

    Could block legitimate traffic.

  • Add an ACL permit rule for SSH from these sources.

    Why it's wrong here

    May grant unauthorized access.

  • Disable SSH access to the router.

    Why it's wrong here

    Could disrupt management.

Common exam traps

Common exam trap: usable hosts are not the same as total addresses

Subnetting questions often tempt you into counting all addresses. In normal IPv4 subnets, the network and broadcast addresses are not usable host addresses.

Detailed technical explanation

How to think about this question

Subnetting questions test whether you can identify the network, broadcast address, usable range, mask and correct subnet. Slow down enough to calculate the block size correctly.

KKey Concepts to Remember

  • CIDR notation defines the prefix length.
  • Block size helps identify subnet boundaries.
  • Network and broadcast addresses are not usable hosts in normal IPv4 subnets.
  • The required host count determines the smallest suitable subnet.

TExam Day Tips

  • Write the block size before choosing the subnet.
  • Check whether the question asks for hosts, subnets or a specific address range.
  • Do not confuse /24, /25, /26 and /27 host counts.

Key takeaway

Count usable hosts — not total addresses — and remember that the network and broadcast addresses are not available to hosts in standard IPv4 subnets.

Real-world example

How this comes up in practice

A security administrator must allow nursing staff to reach a patient records server while blocking access from the guest Wi-Fi VLAN. After applying an extended ACL, traffic is still blocked from nursing workstations. The ACL was applied outbound instead of inbound on the wrong interface. Questions like this test ACL direction and placement rules.

What to study next

Got this wrong? Here's your next step.

Review block sizes, usable host formulas (2^n − 2), and how to find network and broadcast addresses for /24 through /30. Then practise related 200-201 subnetting questions on CIDR, address ranges, and subnet selection.

Related practice questions

Related 200-201 practice-question pages

Use these pages to review the topic behind this question. This is how one missed question becomes focused revision.

Practice this exam

Start a free 200-201 practice session

Short sessions build daily habit. Longer sessions build exam-day stamina. Try a timed session to simulate real conditions.

FAQ

Questions learners often ask

What does this 200-201 question test?

Security Policies and Procedures — This question tests Security Policies and Procedures — CIDR notation defines the prefix length..

What is the correct answer to this question?

The correct answer is: Investigate whether these are legitimate SSH attempts from authorized remote administrators. — Option B is correct because the attempts could be from authorized admins; investigation is needed. Option A is premature. Option C is too aggressive. Option D is not a solution. Option E is extreme.

What should I do if I get this 200-201 question wrong?

Review block sizes, usable host formulas (2^n − 2), and how to find network and broadcast addresses for /24 through /30. Then practise related 200-201 subnetting questions on CIDR, address ranges, and subnet selection.

What is the key concept behind this question?

CIDR notation defines the prefix length.

About these practice questions

Courseiva creates original exam-style practice questions with explanations and wrong-answer analysis. It does not publish real exam questions, exam dumps, or protected exam content. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →

How Courseiva writes practice questions · Editorial policy

Last reviewed: Jun 24, 2026

Question Discussion

Share a tip, memory trick, or ask about the reasoning behind this question. Do not post real exam questions, leaked content, braindumps, or copyrighted exam material. Comments are moderated and may be removed without notice.

Loading comments…

Sign in to join the discussion.

This 200-201 practice question is part of Courseiva's free Cisco certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the 200-201 exam.