Question 66 of 507
Security Policies and ProcedureshardMultiple ChoiceObjective-mapped

Quick Answer

The answer is that the accounting command references a TACACS+ server group that is not defined. This is the most likely cause because the `accounting exec default` statement points to a group named 'tacacs_server_group', but no `tacacs server` or `server group` configuration exists under that name, so the router has no destination for accounting records. Even though SSH authentication succeeds—likely via the local database—the AAA accounting process fails silently when it cannot resolve the undefined server group. On the Cisco CyberOps Associate 200-201 exam, this scenario tests your ability to distinguish between authentication and accounting flows, and it is a common trap: candidates often overlook that a missing group definition breaks accounting without affecting login. A useful memory tip is "Auth works, accounting fails—check the group name trails."

200-201 Security Policies and Procedures Practice Question

This 200-201 practice question tests your understanding of security policies and procedures. The scenario asks you to isolate a root cause — eliminate options that address a different problem before choosing. After answering, compare your reasoning against the explanation and wrong-answer breakdown below. Once you have made your selection, read the full explanation to reinforce the concept and understand why each distractor is designed to mislead on exam day.

Exhibit

Refer to the exhibit.

! Output from show running-config | include aaa
! on a Cisco router
aaa new-model
aaa authentication login default local
aaa authentication login CONSOLE none
aaa authorization exec default local
aaa accounting exec default start-stop group tacacs+
! 
! Output from show running-config | include tacacs
! on the same router
tacacs server TACACS1
 address ipv4 192.168.1.100
 key cisco123
!

Refer to the exhibit. A network administrator notices that remote SSH logins to the router succeed, but the router is not sending accounting records. Based on the configuration, what is the most likely cause?

Clue words in this question

Noticing these words before you look at the options changes how you read each choice.

  • Clue: "most likely"

    Why it matters: Probability qualifier — the question wants the most probable cause or outcome, not a guaranteed one. Eliminate low-probability options.

Question 1hardmultiple choice
Review the full routing breakdown →

Exhibit

Refer to the exhibit.

! Output from show running-config | include aaa
! on a Cisco router
aaa new-model
aaa authentication login default local
aaa authentication login CONSOLE none
aaa authorization exec default local
aaa accounting exec default start-stop group tacacs+
! 
! Output from show running-config | include tacacs
! on the same router
tacacs server TACACS1
 address ipv4 192.168.1.100
 key cisco123
!

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.

Correct answer & explanation

The accounting command references a TACACS+ group that is not defined.

The correct answer is D because the `accounting exec default` command references a TACACS+ server group named 'tacacs_server_group' that is not defined in the configuration. Without a defined server group, the router cannot send accounting records to any TACACS+ server, even though SSH authentication succeeds via the local database.

Key principle: Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.

Answer analysis

Option-by-option breakdown

For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.

  • The AAA authorization method is set to local, not TACACS+.

    Why it's wrong here

    Authorization method is independent of accounting.

  • The TACACS+ server key is not configured correctly.

    Why it's wrong here

    The key 'cisco123' is configured under the server.

  • The AAA authentication method uses local database instead of TACACS+.

    Why it's wrong here

    Authentication method does not affect accounting.

  • The accounting command references a TACACS+ group that is not defined.

    Why this is correct

    The group 'tacacs+' is not defined; only a server is configured.

    Clue confirmation

    The clue word "most likely" in the question point toward this answer.

    Related concept

    Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.

Common exam traps

Common exam trap: answer the scenario, not the keyword

Cisco often tests the distinction between authentication, authorization, and accounting (AAA) components, and the trap here is that candidates assume a working authentication implies accounting is also functional, overlooking that accounting requires a correctly defined and referenced server group.

Detailed technical explanation

How to think about this question

Under the hood, Cisco IOS AAA accounting uses the `aaa accounting` command to specify which events (e.g., exec, commands, network) to log and to which server group. If the server group name in the accounting command does not match a defined `group` under `tacacs server` or `aaa group server tacacs+`, the router will not attempt to send accounting packets, resulting in no records. In a real-world scenario, a misconfigured server group name is a common oversight that leads to silent accounting failures, while authentication and authorization may still function correctly.

KKey Concepts to Remember

  • Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.
  • Find the constraint that changes the correct option.
  • Eliminate answers that are true in general but not in this case.

TExam Day Tips

  • Watch for words such as best, first, most likely and least administrative effort.
  • Review why wrong options are wrong, not only why the correct option is correct.

Key takeaway

Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.

Real-world example

How this comes up in practice

A junior network technician can log in to a core router but cannot reach the enable prompt or configuration mode. The AAA server is authenticating the login — but the authorisation policy only grants privilege level 1, not 15. Authentication (who you are) is working; authorisation (what you can do) is not.

What to study next

Got this wrong? Here's your next step.

Identify which exam domain this question belongs to, review the core concept, then practise similar questions from the same domain.

Related practice questions

Related 200-201 practice-question pages

Use these pages to review the topic behind this question. This is how one missed question becomes focused revision.

Practice this exam

Start a free 200-201 practice session

Short sessions build daily habit. Longer sessions build exam-day stamina. Try a timed session to simulate real conditions.

FAQ

Questions learners often ask

What does this 200-201 question test?

Security Policies and Procedures — This question tests Security Policies and Procedures — Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer..

What is the correct answer to this question?

The correct answer is: The accounting command references a TACACS+ group that is not defined. — The correct answer is D because the `accounting exec default` command references a TACACS+ server group named 'tacacs_server_group' that is not defined in the configuration. Without a defined server group, the router cannot send accounting records to any TACACS+ server, even though SSH authentication succeeds via the local database.

What should I do if I get this 200-201 question wrong?

Identify which exam domain this question belongs to, review the core concept, then practise similar questions from the same domain.

Are there clue words in this question I should notice?

Yes — watch for: "most likely". Probability qualifier — the question wants the most probable cause or outcome, not a guaranteed one. Eliminate low-probability options.

What is the key concept behind this question?

Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.

About these practice questions

Courseiva creates original exam-style practice questions with explanations and wrong-answer analysis. It does not publish real exam questions, exam dumps, or protected exam content. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →

How Courseiva writes practice questions · Editorial policy

Last reviewed: Jun 11, 2026

Question Discussion

Share a tip, memory trick, or ask about the reasoning behind this question. Do not post real exam questions, leaked content, braindumps, or copyrighted exam material. Comments are moderated and may be removed without notice.

Loading comments…

Sign in to join the discussion.

This 200-201 practice question is part of Courseiva's free Cisco certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the 200-201 exam.