- A
Create a network analysis policy exception.
This suppresses the alert for the specific benign traffic without affecting other detections.
- B
Increase the severity threshold.
Why wrong: Increasing threshold may not suppress the alert if it still meets higher severity.
- C
Submit a false positive report to Talos.
Why wrong: This is a long-term action, not the immediate first step.
- D
Disable the intrusion rule globally.
Why wrong: Disabling globally removes detection for all traffic, which is too drastic.
200-201 Security Monitoring Practice Question
This 200-201 practice question tests your understanding of security monitoring. Match the stated requirement to the specific cloud service, access model, or configuration option — many options are valid in isolation but not for this scenario. After answering, compare your reasoning against the explanation and wrong-answer breakdown below. Once you have made your selection, read the full explanation to reinforce the concept and understand why each distractor is designed to mislead on exam day.
A Cisco Firepower sensor is generating an alert for a known benign application. The analyst has verified it is a false positive. What is the first step to suppress this alert?
Clue words in this question
Noticing these words before you look at the options changes how you read each choice.
Clue:
"first"Why it matters: Order matters here. You are being tested on which action comes before the others — not which action is generally useful.
Answer choices
Why each option matters
Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.
Correct answer & explanation
Create a network analysis policy exception.
A network analysis policy (NAP) exception is the correct first step because it allows you to suppress alerts for specific benign applications without affecting the overall detection posture. In Cisco Firepower, NAP exceptions are applied before intrusion rules are evaluated, so they can filter out known false positives at the preprocessor level, preventing the rule from even triggering. This is more efficient than modifying the intrusion rule itself, as it avoids disabling detection for other traffic.
Key principle: Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.
Answer analysis
Option-by-option breakdown
For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.
- ✓
Create a network analysis policy exception.
Why this is correct
This suppresses the alert for the specific benign traffic without affecting other detections.
Clue confirmation
The clue word "first" in the question point toward this answer.
Related concept
Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.
- ✗
Increase the severity threshold.
Why it's wrong here
Increasing threshold may not suppress the alert if it still meets higher severity.
- ✗
Submit a false positive report to Talos.
Why it's wrong here
This is a long-term action, not the immediate first step.
- ✗
Disable the intrusion rule globally.
Why it's wrong here
Disabling globally removes detection for all traffic, which is too drastic.
Common exam traps
Common exam trap: answer the scenario, not the keyword
Cisco often tests the distinction between preprocessor-level suppression (NAP exceptions) and rule-level suppression (disabling rules), where candidates mistakenly choose to disable the rule globally instead of creating a targeted exception.
Detailed technical explanation
How to think about this question
Under the hood, Cisco Firepower's Snort-based inspection engine processes traffic through a series of preprocessors before reaching the intrusion rules. A network analysis policy exception creates a rule in the preprocessor that matches on specific application attributes (e.g., app ID, port, or IP) and instructs the engine to skip further inspection for that flow. This is analogous to a whitelist in the preprocessor phase, ensuring that even if the application triggers a signature, the alert is never generated. In real-world scenarios, this is commonly used for internal tools like Microsoft Teams or custom business applications that generate benign traffic matching known exploit signatures.
KKey Concepts to Remember
- Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.
- Find the constraint that changes the correct option.
- Eliminate answers that are true in general but not in this case.
TExam Day Tips
- Watch for words such as best, first, most likely and least administrative effort.
- Review why wrong options are wrong, not only why the correct option is correct.
Key takeaway
Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.
Real-world example
How this comes up in practice
A practitioner preparing for the 200-201 exam encounters this exact type of scenario on the job. The correct answer here is not the most general option — it is the best answer for the specific constraint described. Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option. Real exam questions reward reading the full scenario before eliminating options, because the constraint defines which answer fits.
What to study next
Got this wrong? Here's your next step.
Identify which exam domain this question belongs to, review the core concept, then practise similar questions from the same domain.
- →
Security Monitoring — study guide chapter
Learn the concepts, then practise the questions
- →
Security Monitoring practice questions
Targeted practice on this topic area only
- →
All 200-201 questions
507 questions across all exam domains
- →
Cisco CyberOps Associate 200-201 study guide
Full concept coverage aligned to exam objectives
- →
200-201 practice test guide
How to use practice tests most effectively before exam day
Related practice questions
Related 200-201 practice-question pages
Use these pages to review the topic behind this question. This is how one missed question becomes focused revision.
Security Policies and Procedures practice questions
Practise 200-201 questions linked to Security Policies and Procedures.
Security Concepts practice questions
Practise 200-201 questions linked to Security Concepts.
Security Monitoring practice questions
Practise 200-201 questions linked to Security Monitoring.
Host-Based Analysis practice questions
Practise 200-201 questions linked to Host-Based Analysis.
Network Intrusion Analysis practice questions
Practise 200-201 questions linked to Network Intrusion Analysis.
200-201 fundamentals practice questions
Practise 200-201 questions linked to 200-201 fundamentals.
200-201 scenario practice questions
Practise 200-201 questions linked to 200-201 scenario.
200-201 troubleshooting practice questions
Practise 200-201 questions linked to 200-201 troubleshooting.
Practice this exam
Start a free 200-201 practice session
Short sessions build daily habit. Longer sessions build exam-day stamina. Try a timed session to simulate real conditions.
FAQ
Questions learners often ask
What does this 200-201 question test?
Security Monitoring — This question tests Security Monitoring — Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer..
What is the correct answer to this question?
The correct answer is: Create a network analysis policy exception. — A network analysis policy (NAP) exception is the correct first step because it allows you to suppress alerts for specific benign applications without affecting the overall detection posture. In Cisco Firepower, NAP exceptions are applied before intrusion rules are evaluated, so they can filter out known false positives at the preprocessor level, preventing the rule from even triggering. This is more efficient than modifying the intrusion rule itself, as it avoids disabling detection for other traffic.
What should I do if I get this 200-201 question wrong?
Identify which exam domain this question belongs to, review the core concept, then practise similar questions from the same domain.
Are there clue words in this question I should notice?
Yes — watch for: "first". Order matters here. You are being tested on which action comes before the others — not which action is generally useful.
What is the key concept behind this question?
Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.
About these practice questions
Courseiva creates original exam-style practice questions with explanations and wrong-answer analysis. It does not publish real exam questions, exam dumps, or protected exam content. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →
Keep practising
More 200-201 practice questions
- A security analyst observes repeated failed login attempts to an internal web server from multiple external IP addresses…
- A security analyst is investigating a host that is suspected of being used as a pivot point in a network intrusion. The…
- Which TWO of the following are common indicators of a denial-of-service (DoS) attack?
- An analyst reviews the ACL applied to the outside interface of a router. The analyst notices that traffic from 192.168.1…
- Which TWO of the following are indicators of a network intrusion? (Choose two.)
- Refer to the exhibit. A network analyst sees repeated denied attempts from host 10.0.0.2 to 10.0.0.1 on port 23. Based o…
Last reviewed: Jun 25, 2026
This 200-201 practice question is part of Courseiva's free Cisco certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the 200-201 exam.
Question Discussion
Share a tip, memory trick, or ask about the reasoning behind this question. Do not post real exam questions, leaked content, braindumps, or copyrighted exam material. Comments are moderated and may be removed without notice.
Sign in to join the discussion.