Question 274 of 507
Security MonitoringmediumMultiple ChoiceObjective-mapped

200-201 Security Monitoring Practice Question

This 200-201 practice question tests your understanding of security monitoring. Match the stated requirement to the specific cloud service, access model, or configuration option — many options are valid in isolation but not for this scenario. After answering, compare your reasoning against the explanation and wrong-answer breakdown below. Once you have made your selection, read the full explanation to reinforce the concept and understand why each distractor is designed to mislead on exam day.

A Cisco Firepower sensor is generating an alert for a known benign application. The analyst has verified it is a false positive. What is the first step to suppress this alert?

Clue words in this question

Noticing these words before you look at the options changes how you read each choice.

  • Clue: "first"

    Why it matters: Order matters here. You are being tested on which action comes before the others — not which action is generally useful.

Question 1mediummultiple choice
Full question →

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.

Correct answer & explanation

Create a network analysis policy exception.

A network analysis policy (NAP) exception is the correct first step because it allows you to suppress alerts for specific benign applications without affecting the overall detection posture. In Cisco Firepower, NAP exceptions are applied before intrusion rules are evaluated, so they can filter out known false positives at the preprocessor level, preventing the rule from even triggering. This is more efficient than modifying the intrusion rule itself, as it avoids disabling detection for other traffic.

Key principle: Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.

Answer analysis

Option-by-option breakdown

For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.

  • Create a network analysis policy exception.

    Why this is correct

    This suppresses the alert for the specific benign traffic without affecting other detections.

    Clue confirmation

    The clue word "first" in the question point toward this answer.

    Related concept

    Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.

  • Increase the severity threshold.

    Why it's wrong here

    Increasing threshold may not suppress the alert if it still meets higher severity.

  • Submit a false positive report to Talos.

    Why it's wrong here

    This is a long-term action, not the immediate first step.

  • Disable the intrusion rule globally.

    Why it's wrong here

    Disabling globally removes detection for all traffic, which is too drastic.

Common exam traps

Common exam trap: answer the scenario, not the keyword

Cisco often tests the distinction between preprocessor-level suppression (NAP exceptions) and rule-level suppression (disabling rules), where candidates mistakenly choose to disable the rule globally instead of creating a targeted exception.

Detailed technical explanation

How to think about this question

Under the hood, Cisco Firepower's Snort-based inspection engine processes traffic through a series of preprocessors before reaching the intrusion rules. A network analysis policy exception creates a rule in the preprocessor that matches on specific application attributes (e.g., app ID, port, or IP) and instructs the engine to skip further inspection for that flow. This is analogous to a whitelist in the preprocessor phase, ensuring that even if the application triggers a signature, the alert is never generated. In real-world scenarios, this is commonly used for internal tools like Microsoft Teams or custom business applications that generate benign traffic matching known exploit signatures.

KKey Concepts to Remember

  • Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.
  • Find the constraint that changes the correct option.
  • Eliminate answers that are true in general but not in this case.

TExam Day Tips

  • Watch for words such as best, first, most likely and least administrative effort.
  • Review why wrong options are wrong, not only why the correct option is correct.

Key takeaway

Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.

Real-world example

How this comes up in practice

A practitioner preparing for the 200-201 exam encounters this exact type of scenario on the job. The correct answer here is not the most general option — it is the best answer for the specific constraint described. Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option. Real exam questions reward reading the full scenario before eliminating options, because the constraint defines which answer fits.

What to study next

Got this wrong? Here's your next step.

Identify which exam domain this question belongs to, review the core concept, then practise similar questions from the same domain.

Related practice questions

Related 200-201 practice-question pages

Use these pages to review the topic behind this question. This is how one missed question becomes focused revision.

Practice this exam

Start a free 200-201 practice session

Short sessions build daily habit. Longer sessions build exam-day stamina. Try a timed session to simulate real conditions.

FAQ

Questions learners often ask

What does this 200-201 question test?

Security Monitoring — This question tests Security Monitoring — Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer..

What is the correct answer to this question?

The correct answer is: Create a network analysis policy exception. — A network analysis policy (NAP) exception is the correct first step because it allows you to suppress alerts for specific benign applications without affecting the overall detection posture. In Cisco Firepower, NAP exceptions are applied before intrusion rules are evaluated, so they can filter out known false positives at the preprocessor level, preventing the rule from even triggering. This is more efficient than modifying the intrusion rule itself, as it avoids disabling detection for other traffic.

What should I do if I get this 200-201 question wrong?

Identify which exam domain this question belongs to, review the core concept, then practise similar questions from the same domain.

Are there clue words in this question I should notice?

Yes — watch for: "first". Order matters here. You are being tested on which action comes before the others — not which action is generally useful.

What is the key concept behind this question?

Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.

About these practice questions

Courseiva creates original exam-style practice questions with explanations and wrong-answer analysis. It does not publish real exam questions, exam dumps, or protected exam content. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →

How Courseiva writes practice questions · Editorial policy

Keep practising

More 200-201 practice questions

Last reviewed: Jun 25, 2026

Question Discussion

Share a tip, memory trick, or ask about the reasoning behind this question. Do not post real exam questions, leaked content, braindumps, or copyrighted exam material. Comments are moderated and may be removed without notice.

Loading comments…

Sign in to join the discussion.

This 200-201 practice question is part of Courseiva's free Cisco certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the 200-201 exam.