An engineer configures model-driven telemetry on a Cisco XR router to send data to a collector. After configuring, the collector receives no data. The engineer verifies that the collector IP and port are reachable. What is the next step to troubleshoot?
The subscription must link the sensor-group and destination-group; if misconfigured, no data is sent.
Why this answer
In model-driven telemetry on Cisco XR, a subscription must explicitly associate a sensor-group (which defines the data to collect) with a destination-group (which defines where to send it). If these are not correctly associated and committed, the router will not stream any telemetry data to the collector, even if the collector is reachable. The verification of reachability confirms the network path is fine, so the next logical step is to check the subscription configuration.
Exam trap
Cisco often tests the misconception that reachability alone guarantees telemetry data flow, when in fact the subscription's sensor-group and destination-group association is the critical link that must be correctly configured and committed.
How to eliminate wrong answers
Option A is wrong because the YANG model validity is typically checked during configuration commit; if the model were invalid, the router would reject the configuration, not silently fail to send data. Option B is wrong because the engineer already verified that the collector IP and port are reachable, which implies a route exists; checking the route again is redundant. Option D is wrong because rebooting the router is a drastic, unnecessary step that does not address the configuration issue and would cause service disruption.
Option E is wrong because SNMP community strings are used for SNMP-based telemetry, not for model-driven telemetry which uses gRPC or TCP-based dial-out with YANG models.