Question 428 of 500
ArchitecturemediumMultiple ChoiceObjective-mapped

Quick Answer

The correct first step is to verify LDP neighbor adjacency. This is because an MPLS LSP relies on Label Distribution Protocol (LDP) to exchange labels between directly connected peers; without a stable LDP adjacency, label bindings cannot be distributed, and the LSP will fail to establish. On the Cisco SPCOR 350-501 exam, this question tests your understanding of the MPLS control plane hierarchy—many candidates mistakenly jump to checking BGP or OSPF, but LDP adjacency is the foundational prerequisite for any label-switched path. A common trap is assuming that reachability (ping) confirms the LSP, but ping only tests IP forwarding, not label switching. For a quick memory tip, remember the LSP troubleshooting mantra: “Labels first, routing second”—always confirm LDP adjacency before checking IGP or BGP.

350-501 Architecture Practice Question

This 350-501 practice question tests your understanding of architecture. The scenario asks you to isolate a root cause — eliminate options that address a different problem before choosing. After answering, compare your reasoning against the explanation and wrong-answer breakdown below. Once you have made your selection, read the full explanation to reinforce the concept and understand why each distractor is designed to mislead on exam day.

An engineer notices that an MPLS LSP in the core is not establishing. Which troubleshooting step should be performed first?

Clue words in this question

Noticing these words before you look at the options changes how you read each choice.

  • Clue: "first"

    Why it matters: Order matters here. You are being tested on which action comes before the others — not which action is generally useful.

Question 1mediummultiple choice
Read the full MPLS explanation →

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.

Correct answer & explanation

Verify LDP neighbor adjacency

Option B is correct because verifying LDP adjacency is the first step in troubleshooting MPLS LSP establishment. Option A is wrong because checking BGP is not directly relevant to MPLS LSP establishment. Option C is wrong because pinging the far-end loopback tests reachability but not LSP establishment. Option D is wrong because checking OSPF neighbor adjacency is not specific to MPLS.

Key principle: OSPF neighbour adjacency depends on matching area, hello/dead timers, network type, and authentication — IP reachability alone is not enough.

Answer analysis

Option-by-option breakdown

For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.

  • Verify LDP neighbor adjacency

    Why this is correct

    LDP adjacency is essential for label exchange and LSP building.

    Clue confirmation

    The clue word "first" in the question point toward this answer.

    Related concept

    OSPF neighbours must agree on key parameters.

  • Ping the far-end loopback interface

    Why it's wrong here

    Ping tests reachability, not LSP.

  • Check BGP IPv4 unicast neighbors

    Why it's wrong here

    BGP is not required for LSP establishment.

  • Check OSPF neighbor adjacency on all links

    Why it's wrong here

    OSPF may not be used for MPLS.

Common exam traps

Common exam trap: OSPF can fail even when IP connectivity looks correct

OSPF neighbour formation depends on matching areas, timers, network type, authentication and passive-interface behaviour. Do not choose an answer only because the devices can ping.

Detailed technical explanation

How to think about this question

OSPF questions usually test the details that control adjacency and route selection. Read the neighbour state, area, router ID and interface configuration before deciding what is wrong.

KKey Concepts to Remember

  • OSPF neighbours must agree on key parameters.
  • Router ID selection can affect neighbour relationships and LSDB output.
  • OSPF cost influences the preferred path.
  • A route can appear in OSPF information but not become the installed route.

TExam Day Tips

  • Check area mismatch first when OSPF adjacency fails.
  • Review passive interfaces when a network is advertised but no neighbour forms.
  • Use show ip ospf neighbor and show ip route clues carefully.

Key takeaway

OSPF neighbour adjacency depends on matching area, hello/dead timers, network type, and authentication — IP reachability alone is not enough.

Real-world example

How this comes up in practice

A network engineer at a university connects two campus buildings via a fibre link. Both routers run OSPF, but no adjacency forms — even though both routers can ping each other. The engineer finds one router is in area 0 and the other in area 1. OSPF adjacency requires matching area numbers, hello/dead timers, and network type. IP reachability alone is not enough.

What to study next

Got this wrong? Here's your next step.

Review OSPF neighbour requirements — matching area type, hello and dead timers, network type, stub flags, and authentication. Study show ip ospf neighbor states (INIT, 2-WAY, FULL). Then practise related 350-501 OSPF questions on adjacency and route selection.

Related practice questions

Related 350-501 practice-question pages

Use these pages to review the topic behind this question. This is how one missed question becomes focused revision.

Practice this exam

Start a free 350-501 practice session

Short sessions build daily habit. Longer sessions build exam-day stamina. Try a timed session to simulate real conditions.

FAQ

Questions learners often ask

What does this 350-501 question test?

Architecture — This question tests Architecture — OSPF neighbours must agree on key parameters..

What is the correct answer to this question?

The correct answer is: Verify LDP neighbor adjacency — Option B is correct because verifying LDP adjacency is the first step in troubleshooting MPLS LSP establishment. Option A is wrong because checking BGP is not directly relevant to MPLS LSP establishment. Option C is wrong because pinging the far-end loopback tests reachability but not LSP establishment. Option D is wrong because checking OSPF neighbor adjacency is not specific to MPLS.

What should I do if I get this 350-501 question wrong?

Review OSPF neighbour requirements — matching area type, hello and dead timers, network type, stub flags, and authentication. Study show ip ospf neighbor states (INIT, 2-WAY, FULL). Then practise related 350-501 OSPF questions on adjacency and route selection.

Are there clue words in this question I should notice?

Yes — watch for: "first". Order matters here. You are being tested on which action comes before the others — not which action is generally useful.

What is the key concept behind this question?

OSPF neighbours must agree on key parameters.

About these practice questions

Courseiva creates original exam-style practice questions with explanations and wrong-answer analysis. It does not publish real exam questions, exam dumps, or protected exam content. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →

How Courseiva writes practice questions · Editorial policy

Last reviewed: Jun 24, 2026

Question Discussion

Share a tip, memory trick, or ask about the reasoning behind this question. Do not post real exam questions, leaked content, braindumps, or copyrighted exam material. Comments are moderated and may be removed without notice.

Loading comments…

Sign in to join the discussion.

This 350-501 practice question is part of Courseiva's free Cisco certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the 350-501 exam.