- A
An access-list is applied under 'mpls ldp advertise-labels' that denies the loopback prefixes.
Label advertisement can be filtered; this is a common issue.
- B
LDP is using UDP for label exchange.
Why wrong: LDP uses TCP for label exchange.
- C
The OSPF cost to the loopbacks is too high.
Why wrong: LDP does not consider IGP cost for label assignment.
- D
The loopback interfaces are not enabled with 'mpls ip'.
Why wrong: 'mpls ip' is needed on interfaces that LDP uses, but loopbacks are not typically used for LDP discovery.
350-501 Networking Practice Question
This 350-501 practice question tests your understanding of networking. This is a configuration task: choose the command set that satisfies every stated requirement. Small differences — like 'secret' vs 'password' or 'transport input ssh' vs 'all' — change whether the answer is correct. After answering, compare your reasoning against the explanation and wrong-answer breakdown below. Once you have made your selection, read the full explanation to reinforce the concept and understand why each distractor is designed to mislead on exam day.
A service provider is deploying a new MPLS core network. The network has four routers: P1, P2, PE1, and PE2. OSPF is used as the IGP. The engineer configures MPLS LDP on all interfaces. After enabling LDP, the engineer notices that the LDP session between P1 and P2 is established, but no labels are exchanged for the loopback0 interfaces of PE1 and PE2. The loopback0 addresses are advertised in OSPF. The engineer verifies that the OSPF routes are present in the routing table of all routers. What is the most likely reason for the missing labels?
Clue words in this question
Noticing these words before you look at the options changes how you read each choice.
Clue:
"most likely"Why it matters: Probability qualifier — the question wants the most probable cause or outcome, not a guaranteed one. Eliminate low-probability options.
Answer choices
Why each option matters
Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.
Correct answer & explanation
An access-list is applied under 'mpls ldp advertise-labels' that denies the loopback prefixes.
The most likely reason is that an access-list is applied under 'mpls ldp advertise-labels' that denies the loopback prefixes. LDP by default advertises labels for all prefixes in the routing table, but the 'advertise-labels' command can filter which prefixes receive labels. If the loopback0 prefixes of PE1 and PE2 are denied by such an access-list, no labels will be advertised for them, even though OSPF routes are present.
Key principle: Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.
Answer analysis
Option-by-option breakdown
For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.
- ✓
An access-list is applied under 'mpls ldp advertise-labels' that denies the loopback prefixes.
Why this is correct
Label advertisement can be filtered; this is a common issue.
Clue confirmation
The clue word "most likely" in the question point toward this answer.
Related concept
Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.
- ✗
LDP is using UDP for label exchange.
Why it's wrong here
LDP uses TCP for label exchange.
- ✗
The OSPF cost to the loopbacks is too high.
Why it's wrong here
LDP does not consider IGP cost for label assignment.
- ✗
The loopback interfaces are not enabled with 'mpls ip'.
Why it's wrong here
'mpls ip' is needed on interfaces that LDP uses, but loopbacks are not typically used for LDP discovery.
Common exam traps
Common exam trap: answer the scenario, not the keyword
Cisco often tests the misconception that 'mpls ip' must be enabled on the loopback interface itself for its prefix to receive a label, when in fact LDP advertises labels for any prefix in the routing table as long as the outgoing interface has 'mpls ip' enabled.
Detailed technical explanation
How to think about this question
LDP uses the 'advertise-labels' command to control which prefixes are advertised with labels; by default, all prefixes in the routing table are advertised, but an access-list can filter them. In MPLS networks, loopback interfaces are often used for BGP peering or LSP endpoints, so filtering their labels can break end-to-end label switching. A real-world scenario is when an operator inadvertently applies a restrictive access-list to conserve label space, causing missing labels for critical loopback prefixes.
KKey Concepts to Remember
- Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.
- Find the constraint that changes the correct option.
- Eliminate answers that are true in general but not in this case.
TExam Day Tips
- Watch for words such as best, first, most likely and least administrative effort.
- Review why wrong options are wrong, not only why the correct option is correct.
Key takeaway
Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.
Real-world example
How this comes up in practice
A network engineer at a university connects two campus buildings via a fibre link. Both routers run OSPF, but no adjacency forms — even though both routers can ping each other. The engineer finds one router is in area 0 and the other in area 1. OSPF adjacency requires matching area numbers, hello/dead timers, and network type. IP reachability alone is not enough.
What to study next
Got this wrong? Here's your next step.
Identify which exam domain this question belongs to, review the core concept, then practise similar questions from the same domain.
- →
Networking — study guide chapter
Learn the concepts, then practise the questions
- →
Networking practice questions
Targeted practice on this topic area only
- →
All 350-501 questions
500 questions across all exam domains
- →
Cisco SPCOR / CCNP Service Provider Core 350-501 study guide
Full concept coverage aligned to exam objectives
- →
350-501 practice test guide
How to use practice tests most effectively before exam day
Related practice questions
Related 350-501 practice-question pages
Use these pages to review the topic behind this question. This is how one missed question becomes focused revision.
Architecture practice questions
Practise 350-501 questions linked to Architecture.
Networking practice questions
Practise 350-501 questions linked to Networking.
MPLS and Segment Routing practice questions
Practise 350-501 questions linked to MPLS and Segment Routing.
Automation and Quality of Service practice questions
Practise 350-501 questions linked to Automation and Quality of Service.
Services practice questions
Practise 350-501 questions linked to Services.
Automation and Assurance practice questions
Practise 350-501 questions linked to Automation and Assurance.
350-501 fundamentals practice questions
Practise 350-501 questions linked to 350-501 fundamentals.
350-501 scenario practice questions
Practise 350-501 questions linked to 350-501 scenario.
350-501 troubleshooting practice questions
Practise 350-501 questions linked to 350-501 troubleshooting.
Practice this exam
Start a free 350-501 practice session
Short sessions build daily habit. Longer sessions build exam-day stamina. Try a timed session to simulate real conditions.
FAQ
Questions learners often ask
What does this 350-501 question test?
Networking — This question tests Networking — Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer..
What is the correct answer to this question?
The correct answer is: An access-list is applied under 'mpls ldp advertise-labels' that denies the loopback prefixes. — The most likely reason is that an access-list is applied under 'mpls ldp advertise-labels' that denies the loopback prefixes. LDP by default advertises labels for all prefixes in the routing table, but the 'advertise-labels' command can filter which prefixes receive labels. If the loopback0 prefixes of PE1 and PE2 are denied by such an access-list, no labels will be advertised for them, even though OSPF routes are present.
What should I do if I get this 350-501 question wrong?
Identify which exam domain this question belongs to, review the core concept, then practise similar questions from the same domain.
Are there clue words in this question I should notice?
Yes — watch for: "most likely". Probability qualifier — the question wants the most probable cause or outcome, not a guaranteed one. Eliminate low-probability options.
What is the key concept behind this question?
Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.
About these practice questions
Courseiva creates original exam-style practice questions with explanations and wrong-answer analysis. It does not publish real exam questions, exam dumps, or protected exam content. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →
Last reviewed: Jun 11, 2026
This 350-501 practice question is part of Courseiva's free Cisco certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the 350-501 exam.
Question Discussion
Share a tip, memory trick, or ask about the reasoning behind this question. Do not post real exam questions, leaked content, braindumps, or copyrighted exam material. Comments are moderated and may be removed without notice.
Sign in to join the discussion.