Question 338 of 500
NetworkingmediumMultiple ChoiceObjective-mapped

350-501 Networking Practice Question

This 350-501 practice question tests your understanding of networking. This is a configuration task: choose the command set that satisfies every stated requirement. Small differences — like 'secret' vs 'password' or 'transport input ssh' vs 'all' — change whether the answer is correct. After answering, compare your reasoning against the explanation and wrong-answer breakdown below. Once you have made your selection, read the full explanation to reinforce the concept and understand why each distractor is designed to mislead on exam day.

A service provider is deploying a new MPLS core network. The network has four routers: P1, P2, PE1, and PE2. OSPF is used as the IGP. The engineer configures MPLS LDP on all interfaces. After enabling LDP, the engineer notices that the LDP session between P1 and P2 is established, but no labels are exchanged for the loopback0 interfaces of PE1 and PE2. The loopback0 addresses are advertised in OSPF. The engineer verifies that the OSPF routes are present in the routing table of all routers. What is the most likely reason for the missing labels?

Clue words in this question

Noticing these words before you look at the options changes how you read each choice.

  • Clue: "most likely"

    Why it matters: Probability qualifier — the question wants the most probable cause or outcome, not a guaranteed one. Eliminate low-probability options.

Question 1mediummultiple choice
Review the full OSPF breakdown →

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.

Correct answer & explanation

An access-list is applied under 'mpls ldp advertise-labels' that denies the loopback prefixes.

The most likely reason is that an access-list is applied under 'mpls ldp advertise-labels' that denies the loopback prefixes. LDP by default advertises labels for all prefixes in the routing table, but the 'advertise-labels' command can filter which prefixes receive labels. If the loopback0 prefixes of PE1 and PE2 are denied by such an access-list, no labels will be advertised for them, even though OSPF routes are present.

Key principle: Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.

Answer analysis

Option-by-option breakdown

For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.

  • An access-list is applied under 'mpls ldp advertise-labels' that denies the loopback prefixes.

    Why this is correct

    Label advertisement can be filtered; this is a common issue.

    Clue confirmation

    The clue word "most likely" in the question point toward this answer.

    Related concept

    Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.

  • LDP is using UDP for label exchange.

    Why it's wrong here

    LDP uses TCP for label exchange.

  • The OSPF cost to the loopbacks is too high.

    Why it's wrong here

    LDP does not consider IGP cost for label assignment.

  • The loopback interfaces are not enabled with 'mpls ip'.

    Why it's wrong here

    'mpls ip' is needed on interfaces that LDP uses, but loopbacks are not typically used for LDP discovery.

Common exam traps

Common exam trap: answer the scenario, not the keyword

Cisco often tests the misconception that 'mpls ip' must be enabled on the loopback interface itself for its prefix to receive a label, when in fact LDP advertises labels for any prefix in the routing table as long as the outgoing interface has 'mpls ip' enabled.

Detailed technical explanation

How to think about this question

LDP uses the 'advertise-labels' command to control which prefixes are advertised with labels; by default, all prefixes in the routing table are advertised, but an access-list can filter them. In MPLS networks, loopback interfaces are often used for BGP peering or LSP endpoints, so filtering their labels can break end-to-end label switching. A real-world scenario is when an operator inadvertently applies a restrictive access-list to conserve label space, causing missing labels for critical loopback prefixes.

KKey Concepts to Remember

  • Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.
  • Find the constraint that changes the correct option.
  • Eliminate answers that are true in general but not in this case.

TExam Day Tips

  • Watch for words such as best, first, most likely and least administrative effort.
  • Review why wrong options are wrong, not only why the correct option is correct.

Key takeaway

Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.

Real-world example

How this comes up in practice

A network engineer at a university connects two campus buildings via a fibre link. Both routers run OSPF, but no adjacency forms — even though both routers can ping each other. The engineer finds one router is in area 0 and the other in area 1. OSPF adjacency requires matching area numbers, hello/dead timers, and network type. IP reachability alone is not enough.

What to study next

Got this wrong? Here's your next step.

Identify which exam domain this question belongs to, review the core concept, then practise similar questions from the same domain.

Related practice questions

Related 350-501 practice-question pages

Use these pages to review the topic behind this question. This is how one missed question becomes focused revision.

Practice this exam

Start a free 350-501 practice session

Short sessions build daily habit. Longer sessions build exam-day stamina. Try a timed session to simulate real conditions.

FAQ

Questions learners often ask

What does this 350-501 question test?

Networking — This question tests Networking — Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer..

What is the correct answer to this question?

The correct answer is: An access-list is applied under 'mpls ldp advertise-labels' that denies the loopback prefixes. — The most likely reason is that an access-list is applied under 'mpls ldp advertise-labels' that denies the loopback prefixes. LDP by default advertises labels for all prefixes in the routing table, but the 'advertise-labels' command can filter which prefixes receive labels. If the loopback0 prefixes of PE1 and PE2 are denied by such an access-list, no labels will be advertised for them, even though OSPF routes are present.

What should I do if I get this 350-501 question wrong?

Identify which exam domain this question belongs to, review the core concept, then practise similar questions from the same domain.

Are there clue words in this question I should notice?

Yes — watch for: "most likely". Probability qualifier — the question wants the most probable cause or outcome, not a guaranteed one. Eliminate low-probability options.

What is the key concept behind this question?

Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.

About these practice questions

Courseiva creates original exam-style practice questions with explanations and wrong-answer analysis. It does not publish real exam questions, exam dumps, or protected exam content. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →

How Courseiva writes practice questions · Editorial policy

Last reviewed: Jun 11, 2026

Question Discussion

Share a tip, memory trick, or ask about the reasoning behind this question. Do not post real exam questions, leaked content, braindumps, or copyrighted exam material. Comments are moderated and may be removed without notice.

Loading comments…

Sign in to join the discussion.

This 350-501 practice question is part of Courseiva's free Cisco certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the 350-501 exam.