Courseiva
Content SecuritymediumMultiple ChoiceObjective-mapped

350-701 SBRS (SenderBase Reputation Score) Practice Question

A security administrator notices that a significant volume of spam is bypassing the Cisco ESA's anti-spam filters. Upon investigation, they find that the messages have a mid-range SBRS score of 5.0. Which action should the administrator take to improve spam detection?

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.

Correct answer & explanation

Increase the SBRS threshold to 7.0

The SenderBase Reputation Score (SBRS) ranges from -10 to +10, with lower scores indicating a higher likelihood of spam and higher scores indicating more legitimate senders. The SBRS threshold is the score below which messages are classified as spam. By default, the threshold may be set low (e.g., 3.0), allowing messages with a mid-range score of 5.0 (which is relatively legitimate) to bypass filters. To catch these messages, the administrator should raise the threshold (e.g., to 7.0), so that messages with scores below 7.0 are considered spam, thus including the 5.0 messages. Option A would reverse score interpretation, causing confusion; Option B would lower the threshold, reducing spam detection because fewer messages would be below the threshold; Option D disables the feature entirely.

Answer analysis

Option-by-option breakdown

For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.

  • Change the SBRS score interpretation to positive

    Why it's wrong here

    Changing the SBRS interpretation to positive would not adjust the threshold and could cause confusion or misclassification.

  • Lower the SBRS threshold to 3.0

    Why it's wrong here

    Lowering the threshold to 3.0 would actually reduce spam detection because the threshold is the score below which messages are considered spam. A lower threshold means fewer messages qualify as spam, so the 5.0 messages would still be considered legitimate.

  • Increase the SBRS threshold to 7.0

    Why this is correct

    Raising the threshold to 7.0 means any message with an SBRS below 7.0 is classified as spam. Since the problematic messages have a score of 5.0, they would now be caught, improving spam detection.

  • Disable SenderBase reputation checks

    Why it's wrong here

    Disabling SenderBase reputation checks removes reputation-based filtering, which would likely increase the amount of spam reaching users.

About these practice questions

Courseiva writes every 350-701 question from scratch — 978 in total, each with an explanation and a wrong-answer breakdown. None are copied from real exams or dumps. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →

How Courseiva writes practice questions · Editorial policy

JA

Written by Johnson Ajibi, MSc IT Security

Senior Network & Security Engineer · founder of Courseiva

This 350-701 practice question is part of Courseiva's free Cisco certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the 350-701 exam.