- A
The AV vendor is not supported by the ISE default posture dictionary
ISE's default dictionary includes common AVs; if the vendor is unsupported, the condition cannot be evaluated correctly.
- B
The posture policy is configured to require the AV version as well
Why wrong: If version were required but not specified, it might cause failure, but the logs indicate a condition not satisfied, not a missing field.
- C
The client's ISE posture agent is not installed
Why wrong: If agent was not installed, ISE would not be able to check AV status at all.
- D
The client's firewall is blocking communication with ISE
Why wrong: Blocking would cause posture unknown, not condition failure.
350-701 Practice Question: Secure Network Access, Visibility and Enforcement
This 350-701 practice question tests your understanding of secure network access, visibility and enforcement. This is a configuration task: choose the command set that satisfies every stated requirement. Small differences — like 'secret' vs 'password' or 'transport input ssh' vs 'all' — change whether the answer is correct. After answering, compare your reasoning against the explanation and wrong-answer breakdown below. Once you have made your selection, read the full explanation to reinforce the concept and understand why each distractor is designed to mislead on exam day.
A government agency is deploying Cisco ISE with a posture agent to ensure endpoints comply with security policies before accessing the network. The posture policy requires that all Windows computers have antivirus (AV) software running. The engineer configures a condition 'AV installed and running' and binds it to an authorization profile that grants full access if compliant, or quarantine if not. During testing, a computer that has AV installed and running (verified manually) is placed in quarantine. ISE logs show 'Posture - AV condition not satisfied'. The engineer checks the ISE posture configuration: the AV condition uses a default Cisco AV dictionary. What is the most likely cause?
Clue words in this question
Noticing these words before you look at the options changes how you read each choice.
Clue:
"most likely"Why it matters: Probability qualifier — the question wants the most probable cause or outcome, not a guaranteed one. Eliminate low-probability options.
Answer choices
Why each option matters
Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.
Correct answer & explanation
The AV vendor is not supported by the ISE default posture dictionary
The posture condition uses a dictionary that maps known AV products. If the specific AV brand is not in the Cisco default dictionary, the condition will fail even if AV is running. Option B is correct. Option A would affect many. Option C would cause other issues. Option D is possible but less likely.
Key principle: Authentication proves identity; authorization controls what that identity can do after login. Both must work for full privileged access.
Answer analysis
Option-by-option breakdown
For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.
- ✓
The AV vendor is not supported by the ISE default posture dictionary
Why this is correct
ISE's default dictionary includes common AVs; if the vendor is unsupported, the condition cannot be evaluated correctly.
Clue confirmation
The clue word "most likely" in the question point toward this answer.
Related concept
Authentication checks who the user is.
- ✗
The posture policy is configured to require the AV version as well
Why it's wrong here
If version were required but not specified, it might cause failure, but the logs indicate a condition not satisfied, not a missing field.
- ✗
The client's ISE posture agent is not installed
Why it's wrong here
If agent was not installed, ISE would not be able to check AV status at all.
- ✗
The client's firewall is blocking communication with ISE
Why it's wrong here
Blocking would cause posture unknown, not condition failure.
Common exam traps
Common exam trap: authentication is not authorization
Logging in proves the user can authenticate. It does not automatically mean the user is allowed to enter privileged or configuration mode. Watch for AAA authorization, privilege level and command authorization details.
Detailed technical explanation
How to think about this question
This kind of question is testing the difference between identity and permission. A user may successfully log in to a router because authentication is working, but still fail to enter configuration mode because authorization is missing, misconfigured or mapped to a lower privilege level.
KKey Concepts to Remember
- Authentication checks who the user is.
- Authorization controls what the user is allowed to do after login.
- Privilege levels affect access to EXEC and configuration commands.
- AAA, TACACS+ and RADIUS can separate login success from command access.
TExam Day Tips
- Do not assume successful login means full administrative access.
- Look for words such as cannot enter configuration mode, privilege level, authorization or command access.
- Separate login problems from permission problems before choosing the answer.
Key takeaway
Authentication proves identity; authorization controls what that identity can do after login. Both must work for full privileged access.
Real-world example
How this comes up in practice
A junior network technician can log in to a core router but cannot reach the enable prompt or configuration mode. The AAA server is authenticating the login — but the authorisation policy only grants privilege level 1, not 15. Authentication (who you are) is working; authorisation (what you can do) is not.
What to study next
Got this wrong? Here's your next step.
Review Cisco AAA concepts — authentication, authorization, and accounting. Study privilege levels (0–15), command authorization under TACACS+, and how RADIUS differs. Then practise related 350-701 questions on access control and AAA configuration.
- →
Secure Network Access, Visibility and Enforcement — study guide chapter
Learn the concepts, then practise the questions
- →
Secure Network Access, Visibility and Enforcement practice questions
Targeted practice on this topic area only
- →
All 350-701 questions
500 questions across all exam domains
- →
Cisco SCOR / CCNP Security Core 350-701 study guide
Full concept coverage aligned to exam objectives
- →
350-701 practice test guide
How to use practice tests most effectively before exam day
Related practice questions
Related 350-701 practice-question pages
Use these pages to review the topic behind this question. This is how one missed question becomes focused revision.
Endpoint Protection and Detection practice questions
Practise 350-701 questions linked to Endpoint Protection and Detection.
Secure Network Access, Visibility and Enforcement practice questions
Practise 350-701 questions linked to Secure Network Access, Visibility and Enforcement.
Security Concepts practice questions
Practise 350-701 questions linked to Security Concepts.
Network Security practice questions
Practise 350-701 questions linked to Network Security.
Cloud Security practice questions
Practise 350-701 questions linked to Cloud Security.
Content Security practice questions
Practise 350-701 questions linked to Content Security.
350-701 fundamentals practice questions
Practise 350-701 questions linked to 350-701 fundamentals.
350-701 scenario practice questions
Practise 350-701 questions linked to 350-701 scenario.
350-701 troubleshooting practice questions
Practise 350-701 questions linked to 350-701 troubleshooting.
Practice this exam
Start a free 350-701 practice session
Short sessions build daily habit. Longer sessions build exam-day stamina. Try a timed session to simulate real conditions.
FAQ
Questions learners often ask
What does this 350-701 question test?
Secure Network Access, Visibility and Enforcement — This question tests Secure Network Access, Visibility and Enforcement — Authentication checks who the user is..
What is the correct answer to this question?
The correct answer is: The AV vendor is not supported by the ISE default posture dictionary — The posture condition uses a dictionary that maps known AV products. If the specific AV brand is not in the Cisco default dictionary, the condition will fail even if AV is running. Option B is correct. Option A would affect many. Option C would cause other issues. Option D is possible but less likely.
What should I do if I get this 350-701 question wrong?
Review Cisco AAA concepts — authentication, authorization, and accounting. Study privilege levels (0–15), command authorization under TACACS+, and how RADIUS differs. Then practise related 350-701 questions on access control and AAA configuration.
Are there clue words in this question I should notice?
Yes — watch for: "most likely". Probability qualifier — the question wants the most probable cause or outcome, not a guaranteed one. Eliminate low-probability options.
What is the key concept behind this question?
Authentication checks who the user is.
About these practice questions
Courseiva creates original exam-style practice questions with explanations and wrong-answer analysis. It does not publish real exam questions, exam dumps, or protected exam content. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →
Last reviewed: Jun 24, 2026
This 350-701 practice question is part of Courseiva's free Cisco certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the 350-701 exam.
Question Discussion
Share a tip, memory trick, or ask about the reasoning behind this question. Do not post real exam questions, leaked content, braindumps, or copyrighted exam material. Comments are moderated and may be removed without notice.
Sign in to join the discussion.