Question 248 of 500
NetworkhardMultiple SelectObjective-mapped

Quick Answer

The answer is that a contract can include multiple subjects, and a contract is a reusable policy construct. This is correct because Cisco ACI contracts are designed to group one or more subjects—each defining a specific filter and action—into a single policy, allowing granular traffic control between EPGs. On the Cisco DCCOR / CCNP Data Center Core 350-601 exam, this concept tests your understanding of how contracts decouple policy from topology; a common trap is assuming each contract can only contain one subject or that contracts are tied to a single EPG. Remember that reusability is the core principle: you define a contract once, then apply it to many EPGs to enforce consistent rules without duplication. A helpful memory tip is to think of a contract as a folder containing multiple subject documents—each subject is a distinct rule set, but the folder itself is the portable policy you attach anywhere.

350-601 Network Practice Question

This 350-601 practice question tests your understanding of network. Match the stated requirement to the specific cloud service, access model, or configuration option — many options are valid in isolation but not for this scenario. After answering, compare your reasoning against the explanation and wrong-answer breakdown below. Once you have made your selection, read the full explanation to reinforce the concept and understand why each distractor is designed to mislead on exam day.

Which TWO statements are true about Cisco ACI contracts? (Choose two)

Question 1hardmulti select
Full question →

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.

Correct answer & explanation

Contracts can be reused across multiple EPGs.

Option A is correct because Cisco ACI contracts are designed as reusable policy constructs. Once a contract is defined, it can be applied to multiple EPGs (Endpoint Groups) without redefining the rules, promoting consistency and reducing administrative overhead. This reusability is a core principle of ACI's policy-based networking model.

Key principle: Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.

Answer analysis

Option-by-option breakdown

For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.

  • Contracts can be reused across multiple EPGs.

    Why this is correct

    A contract can be applied to many EPG pairs, allowing reuse and simplified policy management.

    Related concept

    Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.

  • Contracts are unidirectional from consumer to provider.

    Why it's wrong here

    Contracts are directional, but they allow one-way traffic from provider to consumer (by default). Unidirectional from consumer to provider is incorrect.

  • A contract can include multiple subjects.

    Why this is correct

    A contract can contain multiple subjects, each with its own filters, to define different types of allowed traffic.

    Related concept

    Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.

  • Subjects within a contract specify only the destination ports.

    Why it's wrong here

    Subjects define filters that can include source and destination ports, protocol, and other L4 parameters.

  • Contracts are always bidirectional.

    Why it's wrong here

    Contracts are unidirectional; to allow two-way traffic, two contracts or a single contract with filters covering both directions are needed.

Common exam traps

Common exam trap: answer the scenario, not the keyword

Cisco often tests the misconception that contracts are strictly unidirectional from consumer to provider, when in fact they are bidirectional by default, with filters providing granular control over traffic direction.

Detailed technical explanation

How to think about this question

Under the hood, an ACI contract is a container for one or more subjects, each of which contains filters that define allowed traffic based on Layer 4 parameters (e.g., TCP/UDP ports) and optional Layer 3/4 attributes. The contract direction is enforced by the VRF (Virtual Routing and Forwarding) and the contract's scope (e.g., global, tenant, VRF), which determines how EPGs communicate. In a real-world scenario, a contract might allow HTTP traffic from a web EPG (consumer) to an app EPG (provider) while also permitting return traffic, but a filter could block specific ports or protocols in one direction.

KKey Concepts to Remember

  • Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.
  • Find the constraint that changes the correct option.
  • Eliminate answers that are true in general but not in this case.

TExam Day Tips

  • Watch for words such as best, first, most likely and least administrative effort.
  • Review why wrong options are wrong, not only why the correct option is correct.

Key takeaway

Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.

Real-world example

How this comes up in practice

A small business has 20 workstations on the 192.168.1.0/24 network and one public IP from its ISP. The router uses PAT (NAT overload) so all 20 devices share one public address using different source ports. NAT questions test whether you understand the four address terms and which direction each translation applies.

What to study next

Got this wrong? Here's your next step.

Identify which exam domain this question belongs to, review the core concept, then practise similar questions from the same domain.

Related practice questions

Related 350-601 practice-question pages

Use these pages to review the topic behind this question. This is how one missed question becomes focused revision.

Practice this exam

Start a free 350-601 practice session

Short sessions build daily habit. Longer sessions build exam-day stamina. Try a timed session to simulate real conditions.

FAQ

Questions learners often ask

What does this 350-601 question test?

Network — This question tests Network — Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer..

What is the correct answer to this question?

The correct answer is: Contracts can be reused across multiple EPGs. — Option A is correct because Cisco ACI contracts are designed as reusable policy constructs. Once a contract is defined, it can be applied to multiple EPGs (Endpoint Groups) without redefining the rules, promoting consistency and reducing administrative overhead. This reusability is a core principle of ACI's policy-based networking model.

What should I do if I get this 350-601 question wrong?

Identify which exam domain this question belongs to, review the core concept, then practise similar questions from the same domain.

What is the key concept behind this question?

Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.

About these practice questions

Courseiva creates original exam-style practice questions with explanations and wrong-answer analysis. It does not publish real exam questions, exam dumps, or protected exam content. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →

How Courseiva writes practice questions · Editorial policy

Same concept, more angles

1 more ways this is tested on 350-601

These questions test the same concept from different angles. Work through them to make sure you can recognise it however the exam phrases it.

Variation 1. In a Cisco ACI fabric, the administrator notices that traffic between two endpoints in different EPGs but on the same leaf switch is being dropped when a contract is applied. The endpoints are in the same VRF but different bridge domains. What is the likely cause?

hard
  • A.The VRF is not configured correctly.
  • B.The bridge domains are not in the same network.
  • C.The leaf switch is missing a route to the destination.
  • D.The contract does not allow communication between those EPGs.

Why D: In Cisco ACI, inter-EPG communication is governed by contracts. Even when endpoints reside on the same leaf switch, same VRF, and different bridge domains, traffic is dropped unless a contract explicitly permits the communication between the source and destination EPGs. The contract defines the filter (e.g., IP protocol, ports) and the direction (provider/consumer) required for traffic to flow.

Last reviewed: Jun 24, 2026

Question Discussion

Share a tip, memory trick, or ask about the reasoning behind this question. Do not post real exam questions, leaked content, braindumps, or copyrighted exam material. Comments are moderated and may be removed without notice.

Loading comments…

Sign in to join the discussion.

This 350-601 practice question is part of Courseiva's free Cisco certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the 350-601 exam.