Courseiva
mediumMultiple Choice

CCNP Practice Question: Runs the following command on Router R3: R3# show…

A network engineer runs the following command on Router R3:

R3# show bgp vpnv4 unicast all summary

BGP router identifier 10.0.0.3, local AS number 65000 BGP table version is 10, main routing table version 10 10 network entries using 1440 bytes of memory 10 path entries using 1360 bytes of memory 6/5 BGP path/bestpath attribute entries using 840 bytes of memory 4 BGP AS-PATH entries using 112 bytes of memory 0 BGP route-map cache entries using 0 bytes of memory 0 BGP filter-list cache entries using 0 bytes of memory BGP using 3752 total bytes of memory BGP activity 20/10 prefixes, 20/10 paths, scan interval 60 secs

Neighbor        V           AS MsgRcvd MsgSent   TblVer  InQ OutQ Up/Down  State/PfxRcd
192.168.1.1     4        65000    1000    1000       10    0    0 01:23:45        5
192.168.2.2     4        65000     800     800       10    0    0 00:45:12        3

Based on this output, what can be concluded?

⚠ Common exam trap

Cisco often tests the distinction between eBGP and iBGP by using the same AS number in the output, and candidates may overlook that the `vpnv4 unicast all` address family is specifically for MPLS VPN iBGP peering, not for standard IPv4 unicast.

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.

Correct answer & explanation

✓

Both neighbors are iBGP peers exchanging VPNv4 prefixes

The command `show bgp vpnv4 unicast all summary` displays BGP VPNv4 unicast summary information for all VRFs. Both neighbors (192.168.1.1 and 192.168.2.2) are in the same AS 65000, and the output shows they are exchanging VPNv4 prefixes (State/PfxRcd shows 5 and 3 prefixes received). This confirms they are iBGP peers within the same AS, specifically for VPNv4 address family, which is used in MPLS Layer 3 VPN environments to carry customer VPN routes.

Answer analysis

Option-by-option breakdown

For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.

  • ✗

    Both neighbors are eBGP peers

    Why it's wrong here

    eBGP requires the two peers to belong to different autonomous systems. Here, the local AS is 65000 and both neighbors also show AS 65000, so they are in the same AS, which makes these iBGP sessions. Additionally, the VPNv4 address family is typically carried over iBGP within an MPLS L3VPN service provider network.

  • ✓

    Both neighbors are iBGP peers exchanging VPNv4 prefixes

    Why this is correct

    The output is from the IPv4 VPNv4 BGP table, and both neighbors are configured with the same AS number (65000) as the local router, which classifies them as iBGP peers. The PfxRcd column shows that each neighbor has sent 5 prefixes, meaning they are actively exchanging VPNv4 prefixes with this router. This is the correct interpretation of the 'show bgp vpnv4 unicast all' output.

  • ✗

    The neighbor 192.168.1.1 is not receiving any prefixes

    Why it's wrong here

    The PfxRcd counter for neighbor 192.168.1.1 displays 5, which is the number of prefixes received from that neighbor. A value of 5 indicates that this router has successfully received VPNv4 prefixes from 192.168.1.1, so the claim that it is not receiving any prefixes is incorrect. In contrast, a value of 0 would mean no prefixes are being received.

  • ✗

    The BGP table has 20 prefixes

    Why it's wrong here

    The BGP table shown in the output contains exactly 10 network entries, as seen in the 'Network' column. Each neighbor reports 5 prefixes received (PfxRcd = 5), and the total unique prefixes in the table is 10, not 20. The number 20 would be a simple doubling of the per-neighbor received count, but it does not reflect the actual table size.

About these practice questions

Courseiva writes every 350-401 question from scratch — 1,923 in total, each with an explanation and a wrong-answer breakdown. None are copied from real exams or dumps. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →

How Courseiva writes practice questions · Editorial policy

JA

Written by Johnson Ajibi, MSc IT Security

Senior Network & Security Engineer · founder of Courseiva

This 350-401 practice question is part of Courseiva's free Cisco certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the 350-401 exam.