Question 355 of 2,015
BGPmediumDrag & DropObjective-mapped

Quick Answer

The correct order for BGP confederation setup between sub-ASes begins with assigning the confederation identifier (the main AS), then defining the member sub-AS numbers, configuring eBGP peering between sub-ASes using those sub-AS numbers, ensuring iBGP is configured within each sub-AS, and finally verifying the confederation with show commands. This sequence is correct because the confederation identifier acts as the global identity that external peers see, while the sub-AS numbers allow you to break a large AS into smaller, manageable routing domains that peer with each other using eBGP-like logic—preserving path attributes like MED and local preference without requiring a full iBGP mesh. On the ENCOR 350-401 exam, this drag-and-drop task tests your understanding of how confederations reduce iBGP complexity while maintaining policy control; a common trap is confusing the confederation identifier with a sub-AS number or placing iBGP configuration before the eBGP peering between sub-ASes. Remember the mnemonic “A-D-P-i-V” for Assign identifier, Define sub-ASes, Peer eBGP, internal iBGP, Verify—this mirrors the logical flow from global to local to verification.

CCNP BGP Practice Question

This 350-401 practice question tests your understanding of bgp. Examine the command output carefully: the correct answer depends on what the output actually shows, not on general recall alone. After answering, compare your reasoning against the explanation and wrong-answer breakdown below. Once you have made your selection, read the full explanation to reinforce the concept and understand why each distractor is designed to mislead on exam day.

Drag and drop the steps of BGP confederations setup between sub-ASes into the correct order, from first to last.

Clue words in this question

Noticing these words before you look at the options changes how you read each choice.

  • Clue: "first"

    Why it matters: Order matters here. You are being tested on which action comes before the others — not which action is generally useful.

Question 1mediumdrag order
Open the full BGP breakdown →

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.

Correct answer & explanation

Set bgp confederation identifier

First, you assign the confederation identifier (main AS). Then you define the member sub-AS numbers. Next, you configure eBGP peering between sub-ASes using the sub-AS numbers. After that, you ensure iBGP is configured within each sub-AS. Finally, you verify confederation peers with show ip bgp neighbors.

Key principle: OSPF neighbour adjacency depends on matching area, hello/dead timers, network type, and authentication — IP reachability alone is not enough.

Common exam traps

Common exam trap: OSPF can fail even when IP connectivity looks correct

OSPF neighbour formation depends on matching areas, timers, network type, authentication and passive-interface behaviour. Do not choose an answer only because the devices can ping.

Detailed technical explanation

How to think about this question

OSPF questions usually test the details that control adjacency and route selection. Read the neighbour state, area, router ID and interface configuration before deciding what is wrong.

KKey Concepts to Remember

  • OSPF neighbours must agree on key parameters.
  • Router ID selection can affect neighbour relationships and LSDB output.
  • OSPF cost influences the preferred path.
  • A route can appear in OSPF information but not become the installed route.

TExam Day Tips

  • Check area mismatch first when OSPF adjacency fails.
  • Review passive interfaces when a network is advertised but no neighbour forms.
  • Use show ip ospf neighbor and show ip route clues carefully.

Key takeaway

OSPF neighbour adjacency depends on matching area, hello/dead timers, network type, and authentication — IP reachability alone is not enough.

Real-world example

How this comes up in practice

A network engineer at a university connects two campus buildings via a fibre link. Both routers run OSPF, but no adjacency forms — even though both routers can ping each other. The engineer finds one router is in area 0 and the other in area 1. OSPF adjacency requires matching area numbers, hello/dead timers, and network type. IP reachability alone is not enough.

What to study next

Got this wrong? Here's your next step.

Review OSPF neighbour requirements — matching area type, hello and dead timers, network type, stub flags, and authentication. Study show ip ospf neighbor states (INIT, 2-WAY, FULL). Then practise related 350-401 OSPF questions on adjacency and route selection.

Related practice questions

Related 350-401 practice-question pages

Use these pages to review the topic behind this question. This is how one missed question becomes focused revision.

Practice this exam

Start a free 350-401 practice session

Short sessions build daily habit. Longer sessions build exam-day stamina. Try a timed session to simulate real conditions.

FAQ

Questions learners often ask

What does this 350-401 question test?

BGP — This question tests BGP — OSPF neighbours must agree on key parameters..

What is the correct answer to this question?

The correct answer is: Set bgp confederation identifier — First, you assign the confederation identifier (main AS). Then you define the member sub-AS numbers. Next, you configure eBGP peering between sub-ASes using the sub-AS numbers. After that, you ensure iBGP is configured within each sub-AS. Finally, you verify confederation peers with show ip bgp neighbors.

What should I do if I get this 350-401 question wrong?

Review OSPF neighbour requirements — matching area type, hello and dead timers, network type, stub flags, and authentication. Study show ip ospf neighbor states (INIT, 2-WAY, FULL). Then practise related 350-401 OSPF questions on adjacency and route selection.

Are there clue words in this question I should notice?

Yes — watch for: "first". Order matters here. You are being tested on which action comes before the others — not which action is generally useful.

What is the key concept behind this question?

OSPF neighbours must agree on key parameters.

About these practice questions

Courseiva creates original exam-style practice questions with explanations and wrong-answer analysis. It does not publish real exam questions, exam dumps, or protected exam content. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →

How Courseiva writes practice questions · Editorial policy

Same concept, more angles

1 more ways this is tested on 350-401

These questions test the same concept from different angles. Work through them to make sure you can recognise it however the exam phrases it.

Variation 1. Drag and drop the steps of BGP confederations setup between sub-ASes into the correct order, from first to last.

medium
  • A.Enable BGP with local sub-AS number
  • B.Configure bgp confederation identifier
  • C.Specify bgp confederation peers (sub-ASes)
  • D.Establish eBGP peering between sub-ASes
  • E.Verify confederation routes with show bgp

Why A: Confederation setup requires enabling BGP, configuring the confederation identifier and sub-AS list, then peering between sub-ASes, and finally verifying the confederation membership.

Last reviewed: Jun 18, 2026

Question Discussion

Share a tip, memory trick, or ask about the reasoning behind this question. Do not post real exam questions, leaked content, braindumps, or copyrighted exam material. Comments are moderated and may be removed without notice.

Loading comments…

Sign in to join the discussion.

This 350-401 practice question is part of Courseiva's free Cisco certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the 350-401 exam.