Courseiva
Security Policy and NAT →mediumMultiple Choice

156-215.81.20 Security Policy and NAT Practice Question

Exhibit

fw ctl get int fw_nat_hide_nat_map_table_size
fw_nat_hide_nat_map_table_size = 5000

Refer to the exhibit. An administrator is experiencing intermittent connectivity issues for users behind Hide NAT. What might this setting indicate regarding the root cause?

⚠ Common exam trap

Candidates often assume the issue is a routing or firewall policy problem, ignoring the technical limitation of the NAT table size which is a common bottleneck for high-concurrency environments.

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.

Correct answer & explanation

✓

The NAT table limit is too low for the current traffic load.

The parameter 'fw_nat_hide_nat_map_table_size' determines the maximum number of simultaneous translations the gateway can track for Hide NAT. A value of 5000 might be insufficient for a high-traffic environment with many concurrent users. When this limit is reached, new Hide NAT sessions cannot be created, leading to connectivity drops for internal hosts until existing sessions expire and free up table entries.

Answer analysis

Option-by-option breakdown

For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.

  • ✗

    The gateway is running out of memory for connection states.

    Why it's wrong here

    While related to memory, this specific parameter is for the NAT translation map table, not the global connection state table. The global connection table is managed by different parameters. Focusing on the wrong table will lead to incorrect troubleshooting steps and failure to resolve the underlying NAT capacity issue.

  • ✓

    The NAT table limit is too low for the current traffic load.

    Why this is correct

    If the number of concurrent Hide NAT sessions exceeds 5000, new connections will be rejected by the NAT engine. This is a common bottleneck in busy environments. Increasing this value is a standard way to resolve intermittent connection issues caused by session capacity limits in the translation mapping table.

  • ✗

    The gateway is misconfigured and needs to be set to 0.

    Why it's wrong here

    Setting this value to 0 would likely disable the ability to track NAT mappings, potentially breaking all outbound traffic. This is not a recommended troubleshooting step and would likely result in a complete loss of internet connectivity for all users behind the gateway, rather than resolving the intermittent issues.

  • ✗

    The system is ignoring all NAT rule changes.

    Why it's wrong here

    This parameter is exclusively for the capacity of the translation map table. It has no bearing on whether NAT rules are applied or ignored. If NAT rules were being ignored, it would be due to other kernel parameters or a failure to install the policy properly, not the map table size.

Visual reference

Inside (Private) PC-A 10.0.0.1 PC-B 10.0.0.2 NAT Router Outside (Public) 203.0.113.1 Inside Global Server PAT: many private IPs share one public IP via unique port numbers

About these practice questions

This 156-215.81.20 question is part of Courseiva's 210-question bank — original exam-style content with full explanations and wrong-answer analysis, never real exam questions or exam dumps. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →

How Courseiva writes practice questions · Editorial policy

JA

Written and reviewed by Johnson Ajibi, MSc IT Security

Senior Network & Security Engineer · founder of Courseiva

Last reviewed September 2026 · checked against the official Check Point exam blueprint

This 156-215.81.20 practice question is part of Courseiva's free Check Point certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the 156-215.81.20 exam.