An IT service provider is implementing continual improvement practices across multiple global business units. Resistance varies wildly across regions due to differing local labor laws and management styles. What OCM framework adjustment is essential?
Regional variance in labour law and management style makes a single rigid rollout unworkable. Delegating tailoring authority to local change agents lets each business unit adapt tactics to its legal and cultural context, satisfying the stem's constraint that resistance differs wildly across regions.
Why this answer
A flexible OCM framework that empowers regional change agents to adapt execution to local labor laws and cultural norms is essential when resistance varies by region. This balances global consistency of the continual improvement initiative with local relevance, which is the core principle of glocalized change management.
Exam trap
The trap is choosing rigid global standardization (Option C) because it sounds like 'best practice' — but the scenario explicitly cites differing labor laws and management styles, which demand localized adaptation within a global framework.
How to eliminate wrong answers
Option A is wrong because abolishing regional business units destroys local knowledge and autonomy, and is impractical for legal and operational reasons. Option B is wrong because abandoning the initiative in regions with initial resistance guarantees failure and creates inconsistent service delivery. Option C is wrong because a rigid global plan ignores differing labor laws and management styles, which is exactly what the scenario says causes resistance.