Courseiva

SAP-C02 Practice Question: Design Solutions for Organizational Complexity

A company uses AWS Organizations and has deployed a multi-account strategy. The security team wants to enforce that all S3 buckets have versioning enabled. They create an SCP that denies the PutBucketVersioning action if versioning is not enabled. However, they find that the SCP is not preventing users in member accounts from disabling versioning on existing buckets. What is the most likely reason?

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.

Correct answer & explanation

✓

SCPs cannot evaluate the current state of a resource; they can only deny actions based on request parameters.

The most likely reason is option C: SCPs cannot evaluate the current state of a resource; they can only deny actions based on request parameters. SCPs do not have visibility into the current configuration of resources like S3 bucket versioning. Therefore, an SCP that attempts to deny PutBucketVersioning if versioning is not enabled cannot work because it cannot check the bucket's current versioning status. This allows users to disable versioning. Option A is incorrect because SCPs are hierarchical and cannot be overridden by another SCP unless there is an explicit allow, but the core issue is the condition evaluation. Option B is incorrect because SCPs use explicit deny, not a default deny. Option D is incorrect because applying the SCP to the root OU would not resolve the fundamental limitation that SCPs cannot check resource state.

Answer analysis

Option-by-option breakdown

For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.

  • ✗

    The SCP is overridden by a service control policy that allows the action.

    Why it's wrong here

    No SCP can allow an action another SCP denies; permissions are the intersection, and an allow statement never overrides a deny. The actual failure is that the condition cannot inspect existing bucket versioning state. Layered allow policies matter when granting permissions across accounts, not when enforcing a deny-based guardrail.

  • ✗

    The SCP does not have an explicit deny; it uses a default deny.

    Why it's wrong here

    SCPs always deny by default; only explicit Deny statements restrict actions, so the absence of an explicit deny is normal and not the fault. The real issue is that the deny condition cannot evaluate the bucket's current versioning state. Default deny is expected behaviour in every SCP, not a misconfiguration.

  • ✓

    SCPs cannot evaluate the current state of a resource; they can only deny actions based on request parameters.

    Why this is correct

    SCPs are evaluated statically against the request's action and parameters, so a condition cannot read whether versioning is currently enabled on the bucket. The deny therefore never matches, letting users disable versioning on existing buckets.

  • ✗

    The SCP is not applied to the root organizational unit.

    Why it's wrong here

    SCPs attached at the root OU already apply to every member account beneath it, so root attachment is not required and its absence is not the cause. The genuine problem is that the deny condition cannot read the bucket's current versioning configuration. Root-level attachment is used to enforce organisation-wide guardrails broadly.

Visual reference

Client Recursive Resolver Root DNS (13 root servers) TLD DNS (.com, .org, …) Authoritative example.com query IP addr answer

Quick reference

AWS S3 Storage Class Comparison

Storage ClassMin DurationRetrievalUse Case
S3 StandardNoneImmediateFrequently accessed data
S3 Standard-IA30 daysImmediateInfrequent access, rapid retrieval
S3 One Zone-IA30 daysImmediateNon-critical infrequent data
S3 Intelligent-TieringNoneImmediate–hoursUnknown or changing access patterns
S3 Glacier Instant90 daysMillisecondsArchive with instant retrieval
S3 Glacier Flexible90 daysMinutes–hoursArchive, flexible retrieval
S3 Glacier Deep Archive180 daysHoursLong-term compliance archive

About these practice questions

This SAP-C02 question is part of Courseiva's 984-question bank — original exam-style content with full explanations and wrong-answer analysis, never real exam questions or exam dumps. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →

How Courseiva writes practice questions · Editorial policy

JA

Written by Johnson Ajibi, MSc IT Security

Senior Network & Security Engineer · founder of Courseiva

This SAP-C02 practice question is part of Courseiva's free Amazon Web Services certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the SAP-C02 exam.