Question 995 of 1,746
Accelerate Workload Migration and ModernizationhardMultiple ChoiceObjective-mapped

Quick Answer

The answer is to use Windows containers on Amazon ECS with the ECS-optimized Windows Server AMI, because this is the only approach that fully supports .NET Framework 4.7 applications with COM+ components and Windows authentication. Windows containers on ECS run on Windows Server Core, which provides the necessary Windows kernel and COM+ infrastructure that Linux containers and serverless options lack. On the AWS Certified Solutions Architect Professional SAP-C02 exam, this question tests your understanding of the hard boundary between .NET Framework (Windows-only) and .NET Core/.NET 5+ (cross-platform), and it often appears as a distractor where candidates mistakenly choose Elastic Beanstalk or Lambda. A common trap is assuming that any "container" solution works, but Linux containers cannot host COM+ or full .NET Framework. Memory tip: "COM+ means Windows+ — never try to run legacy COM on Linux."

SAP-C02 Practice Question: Accelerate Workload Migration and Modernization

This SAP-C02 practice question tests your understanding of accelerate workload migration and modernization. Read the scenario carefully and evaluate each option against the stated constraints before committing to an answer. After answering, compare your reasoning against the explanation and wrong-answer breakdown below. Once you have made your selection, read the full explanation to reinforce the concept and understand why each distractor is designed to mislead on exam day.

A company is migrating a legacy .NET Framework 4.7 application to AWS. The application uses Windows authentication and COM+ components. Which migration approach is most suitable?

Question 1hardmultiple choice
Full question →

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.

Correct answer & explanation

Use Windows containers on Amazon ECS with Amazon ECS-optimized Windows Server AMI

Windows containers on Amazon ECS with Windows Server Core support .NET Framework applications and COM+. Option A is wrong because Linux containers do not support .NET Framework. Option B is wrong because Elastic Beanstalk with Linux does not support .NET Framework. Option D is wrong because Lambda does not support full .NET Framework.

Key principle: Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.

Answer analysis

Option-by-option breakdown

For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.

  • Replatform to .NET Core on AWS Elastic Beanstalk (Linux)

    Why it's wrong here

    .NET Core is not fully compatible with .NET Framework and COM+.

  • Use Windows containers on Amazon ECS with Amazon ECS-optimized Windows Server AMI

    Why this is correct

    Windows containers support .NET Framework and COM+ components.

    Related concept

    Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.

  • Refactor to run on AWS Lambda with .NET Core 3.1

    Why it's wrong here

    Lambda does not support full .NET Framework or COM+.

  • Containerize with Linux containers on Amazon ECS

    Why it's wrong here

    .NET Framework requires Windows containers.

Common exam traps

Common exam trap: answer the scenario, not the keyword

Many certification questions include familiar terms but test a specific constraint. Read the exact wording before choosing an answer that is generally true but wrong for this case.

Detailed technical explanation

How to think about this question

This question should be treated as a scenario, not a definition check. Identify the problem, the constraint and the best action. Then compare each option against those facts.

KKey Concepts to Remember

  • Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.
  • Find the constraint that changes the correct option.
  • Eliminate answers that are true in general but not in this case.
  • Use explanations to understand the rule behind the answer.

TExam Day Tips

  • Underline the problem statement mentally.
  • Watch for words such as best, first, most likely and least administrative effort.
  • Review why wrong options are wrong, not only why the correct option is correct.

Key takeaway

Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.

Real-world example

How this comes up in practice

A company's IT admin needs to give a contractor read-only access to production logs without sharing account credentials. Using role-based access control (RBAC) and temporary scoped permissions — not a permanent shared password — is the correct pattern. Questions like this test whether you can apply least-privilege access across cloud identity services.

What to study next

Got this wrong? Here's your next step.

Identify which SAP-C02 exam domain this question belongs to, then review the specific concept being tested. Practise related questions in that domain and focus on understanding why each wrong answer is tempting — not just why the correct answer is right.

Related practice questions

Related SAP-C02 practice-question pages

Use these pages to review the topic behind this question. This is how one missed question becomes focused revision.

Practice this exam

Start a free SAP-C02 practice session

Short sessions build daily habit. Longer sessions build exam-day stamina. Try a timed session to simulate real conditions.

FAQ

Questions learners often ask

What does this SAP-C02 question test?

Accelerate Workload Migration and Modernization — This question tests Accelerate Workload Migration and Modernization — Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer..

What is the correct answer to this question?

The correct answer is: Use Windows containers on Amazon ECS with Amazon ECS-optimized Windows Server AMI — Windows containers on Amazon ECS with Windows Server Core support .NET Framework applications and COM+. Option A is wrong because Linux containers do not support .NET Framework. Option B is wrong because Elastic Beanstalk with Linux does not support .NET Framework. Option D is wrong because Lambda does not support full .NET Framework.

What should I do if I get this SAP-C02 question wrong?

Identify which SAP-C02 exam domain this question belongs to, then review the specific concept being tested. Practise related questions in that domain and focus on understanding why each wrong answer is tempting — not just why the correct answer is right.

What is the key concept behind this question?

Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.

About these practice questions

Courseiva creates original exam-style practice questions with explanations and wrong-answer analysis. It does not publish real exam questions, exam dumps, or protected exam content. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →

How Courseiva writes practice questions · Editorial policy

Same concept, more angles

2 more ways this is tested on SAP-C02

These questions test the same concept from different angles. Work through them to make sure you can recognise it however the exam phrases it.

Variation 1. A company is migrating a legacy .NET Framework 4.8 application to AWS. The application uses Windows authentication integrated with Active Directory and relies on a shared file system for configuration files. The company wants to minimize operational overhead and use managed services. Which combination of AWS services should the company use to modernize the application?

hard
  • A.AWS Managed Microsoft AD, Amazon EFS, and AWS Elastic Beanstalk for .NET on Windows
  • B.Amazon Cognito, Amazon RDS for SQL Server, and AWS Lambda
  • C.AWS Directory Service for Microsoft AD, Amazon S3, and AWS App Runner
  • D.AWS Managed Microsoft AD, Amazon FSx for Windows File Server, and AWS Elastic Beanstalk for .NET on Windows

Why D: Option C is correct: AWS Managed Microsoft AD provides Windows authentication, FSx for Windows File Server provides a managed shared file system, and App Runner is not suitable for .NET; Elastic Beanstalk with Windows platform supports .NET and reduces overhead. Option A uses EFS which does not support Windows authentication natively. Option B uses RDS for SQL Server which is not needed. Option D uses S3 which cannot replace a shared file system for Windows apps.

Variation 2. A company is migrating a .NET application from Windows Server to Linux on EC2. The application uses a proprietary COM+ component that cannot be recompiled. Which migration path should they take?

medium
  • A.Rehost the application on Linux EC2 using Wine
  • B.Rehost the application on Windows Server EC2 instances
  • C.Refactor the COM+ component to a REST API
  • D.Replatform the application to .NET Core and run on Linux

Why B: Since the COM+ component cannot be recompiled and is Windows-specific, the only viable option is to remain on Windows using EC2 (Rehost). Option A (Replatform to .NET Core on Linux) is impossible because COM+ does not run on Linux. Option B (Refactor the component) violates the constraint. Option D (Rehost using Linux) is invalid.

Last reviewed: Jun 20, 2026

Question Discussion

Share a tip, memory trick, or ask about the reasoning behind this question. Do not post real exam questions, leaked content, braindumps, or copyrighted exam material. Comments are moderated and may be removed without notice.

Loading comments…

Sign in to join the discussion.

This SAP-C02 practice question is part of Courseiva's free Amazon Web Services certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the SAP-C02 exam.