SAP-C02 Practice Question: Accelerate Workload Migration and Modernization
A company is migrating a legacy application to AWS using the 7 Rs migration strategy. The application is a monolithic Java application running on a single on-premises server with a MySQL database. The company wants to reduce operational overhead and improve scalability. The development team has already containerized the application and tested it locally. The company wants to run the containerized application on AWS without managing the underlying infrastructure. Which AWS service should the company use to deploy the containerized application?
Answer choices
Why each option matters
Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.
Correct answer & explanation
✓
Amazon ECS with AWS Fargate launch type
Amazon ECS with AWS Fargate launch type is a serverless compute engine for containers, eliminating infrastructure management. Option B (EKS with managed node groups) still requires managing the node groups at the EC2 level. Option C (EC2 with Docker) requires managing EC2 instances. Option D (Lightsail containers) is not as scalable or integrated with AWS services as ECS with Fargate.
Answer analysis
Option-by-option breakdown
For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.
- ✓
Amazon ECS with AWS Fargate launch type
Why this is correct
Amazon ECS with Fargate is serverless, managing no underlying infrastructure.
- ✗
Amazon EKS with managed node groups
Why it's wrong here
EKS with managed node groups still requires EC2 instance management for the nodes.
- ✗
Amazon EC2 with Docker installed
Why it's wrong here
Running Docker on EC2 requires full management of EC2 instances.
- ✗
Amazon Lightsail containers
Why it's wrong here
Amazon Lightsail containers are designed for simple, fixed-price container deployments, offering minimal operational overhead for straightforward applications. While they deploy containers without managing underlying infrastructure, their limited scaling capabilities make them unsuitable for an application explicitly seeking *improved* scalability, as required here. Lightsail containers provide fixed plans and restricted horizontal scaling, failing to meet the dynamic, high-scale needs of a migrating monolithic application. They would be appropriate for small, predictable workloads or development environments where cost simplicity outweighs advanced scalability requirements.
Quick reference
Cloud Service Model Comparison
| Model | You Manage | Provider Manages | Examples |
|---|---|---|---|
| IaaS | OS, runtime, apps, data | Hardware, hypervisor, networking | EC2, Azure VMs, GCP Compute Engine |
| PaaS | Apps and data | OS, runtime, middleware, hardware | Elastic Beanstalk, Azure App Service |
| SaaS | Data and settings only | Everything else | Microsoft 365, Salesforce, Workday |
| FaaS / Serverless | Function code only | Infra, scaling, runtime | Lambda, Azure Functions, Cloud Run |
| CaaS | Containers and apps | Kubernetes, OS, hardware | EKS, AKS, GKE |
Go deeper
Related to this question
About these practice questions
This SAP-C02 question is part of Courseiva's 1,660-question bank — original exam-style content with full explanations and wrong-answer analysis, never real exam questions or exam dumps. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →
JA
Written by Johnson Ajibi, MSc IT Security
Senior Network & Security Engineer · founder of Courseiva
This SAP-C02 practice question is part of Courseiva's free Amazon Web Services certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the SAP-C02 exam.