Courseiva
Continuous Improvement for Existing SolutionseasyMultiple ChoiceObjective-mapped

SAP-C02 Continuous Improvement for Existing Solutions Practice Question

A company has deployed a web application behind an Application Load Balancer (ALB) with an Auto Scaling group. Users report that the application is slow during peak hours. The CPU utilization of the EC2 instances is consistently below 40%, but the ALB's request count per target is high. Which action would MOST improve performance?

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.

Correct answer & explanation

Increase the desired capacity of the Auto Scaling group

High request count per target with low CPU utilization suggests the application is I/O bound or waiting on external calls. Adding more instances by increasing the desired capacity distributes the load across more targets, reducing queueing and improving performance. Option A is wrong because the bottleneck is not CPU, so increasing instance size is unlikely to help. Option C is wrong because scaling based on CPU utilization would not trigger since CPU is low. Option D is wrong because changing the ALB routing algorithm to least outstanding requests might help distribute load more evenly but does not add capacity; increasing desired capacity directly addresses the high request count per target.

Answer analysis

Option-by-option breakdown

For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.

  • Increase the instance size (e.g., from t3.medium to t3.large)

    Why it's wrong here

    CPU is low, so larger instances may not improve performance.

  • Increase the desired capacity of the Auto Scaling group

    Why this is correct

    Adding more instances reduces request count per target.

  • Configure the Auto Scaling group to scale based on CPU utilization

    Why it's wrong here

    CPU is low, so this would not scale out.

  • Change the ALB routing algorithm to least outstanding requests

    Why it's wrong here

    This could help slightly but does not add capacity.

About these practice questions

One of 1,660 original SAP-C02 practice questions on Courseiva, each with a full explanation and wrong-answer analysis — not exam dumps or protected exam content. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →

How Courseiva writes practice questions · Editorial policy

Same concept, more angles

1 more way this is tested on SAP-C02

These questions test the same concept from different angles. Work through them to make sure you can recognise it however the exam phrases it.

Variation 1. A company runs a web application on EC2 instances behind an Application Load Balancer (ALB). The application experiences periodic spikes in traffic. The operations team wants to ensure that the application can handle the spikes without manual intervention. What is the MOST cost-effective solution?

easy
  • A.Use a scheduled scaling policy to add instances during predicted peak hours.
  • B.Create a target tracking scaling policy using the ALB RequestCountPerTarget metric.
  • C.Manually add instances when traffic spikes are expected.
  • D.Use a simple scaling policy based on CPU utilization.

Why B: A target tracking scaling policy automatically adjusts capacity based on a specific metric, and using the ALB RequestCountPerTarget metric is appropriate for handling traffic spikes in a cost-effective manner. This policy maintains the desired metric value by adding or removing instances as needed, without manual intervention. Option A is incorrect because a scheduled scaling policy assumes predictable peaks, but the traffic spikes are periodic and may not follow a fixed schedule. Option C is incorrect because manual intervention is not cost-effective and defeats the purpose of automation. Option D is incorrect because a simple scaling policy based on CPU utilization may not react quickly enough to sudden traffic spikes and could be less cost-effective than target tracking.

JA

Written by Johnson Ajibi, MSc IT Security

Senior Network & Security Engineer · founder of Courseiva

This SAP-C02 practice question is part of Courseiva's free Amazon Web Services certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the SAP-C02 exam.