Courseiva
Design for New Solutions →hardMultiple Choice

SAP-C02 Design for New Solutions Practice Question

Exhibit

Refer to the exhibit.

{
  "Version": "2012-10-17",
  "Statement": [
    {
      "Effect": "Allow",
      "Principal": {
        "AWS": "arn:aws:iam::123456789012:role/CrossAccountRole"
      },
      "Action": [
        "s3:GetObject",
        "s3:PutObject"
      ],
      "Resource": "arn:aws:s3:::my-bucket/*",
      "Condition": {
        "StringEquals": {
          "s3:x-amz-server-side-encryption": "aws:kms"
        }
      }
    }
  ]
}

A company has a bucket policy on an S3 bucket as shown in the exhibit. A cross-account role (CrossAccountRole) is used to access the bucket. The role has an IAM policy that allows s3:GetObject and s3:PutObject on the bucket. When users assume the role and try to upload objects without specifying encryption, the upload fails. What must the users do to successfully upload objects?

⚠ Common exam trap

Candidates often assume the failure is due to missing KMS key permissions (Option D) or missing IAM permissions (Option B), but the actual cause is the bucket policy condition requiring the encryption header, which is a common S3 security pattern tested on the SAP-C02 exam.

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.

Correct answer & explanation

✓

Include the x-amz-server-side-encryption header with value aws:kms in the upload request.

The bucket policy includes a condition that requires the `x-amz-server-side-encryption` header to be set to `aws:kms` for `s3:PutObject` operations. When users assume the cross-account role and upload objects without specifying encryption, the request fails because it does not satisfy this condition. Including the `x-amz-server-side-encryption: aws:kms` header in the upload request explicitly meets the condition, allowing the upload to succeed.

Answer analysis

Option-by-option breakdown

For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.

  • ✗

    Remove the condition from the bucket policy.

    Why it's wrong here

    Deleting the condition removes the encryption requirement entirely, weakening the bucket's security posture rather than satisfying it. The condition is what blocks unencrypted uploads, so removing it lets data land unencrypted. Editing the policy is tempting as a quick fix, but the correct approach supplies the encryption the condition demands.

  • ✗

    Add an IAM policy that allows s3:PutObject to the role.

    Why it's wrong here

    The role already allows s3:PutObject, so adding another identical permission changes nothing; the failure comes from the bucket policy's encryption condition, not from IAM. Duplicating an existing allow is tempting because IAM denials commonly cause access failures. Here the request must carry the required encryption header to pass the policy.

  • ✓

    Include the x-amz-server-side-encryption header with value aws:kms in the upload request.

    Why this is correct

    The bucket policy likely denies PutObject unless the request specifies SSE-KMS encryption. Adding the x-amz-server-side-encryption header with aws:kms satisfies that condition, so the assumed role's s3:PutObject permission is no longer blocked by the explicit deny.

  • ✗

    Grant the role permission to use the KMS key.

    Why it's wrong here

    The bucket policy's condition requires a specific encryption header, so granting KMS permissions does not satisfy it; the upload still fails the policy check. KMS permissions matter only when objects use SSE-KMS, which is the tempting association here. The scenario needs the request to meet the encryption condition, not key access.

Quick reference

AWS S3 Storage Class Comparison

Storage ClassMin DurationRetrievalUse Case
S3 StandardNoneImmediateFrequently accessed data
S3 Standard-IA30 daysImmediateInfrequent access, rapid retrieval
S3 One Zone-IA30 daysImmediateNon-critical infrequent data
S3 Intelligent-TieringNoneImmediate–hoursUnknown or changing access patterns
S3 Glacier Instant90 daysMillisecondsArchive with instant retrieval
S3 Glacier Flexible90 daysMinutes–hoursArchive, flexible retrieval
S3 Glacier Deep Archive180 daysHoursLong-term compliance archive

About these practice questions

Courseiva writes every SAP-C02 question from scratch — 984 in total, each with an explanation and a wrong-answer breakdown. None are copied from real exams or dumps. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →

How Courseiva writes practice questions · Editorial policy

JA

Written by Johnson Ajibi, MSc IT Security

Senior Network & Security Engineer · founder of Courseiva

This SAP-C02 practice question is part of Courseiva's free Amazon Web Services certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the SAP-C02 exam.