mediummulti selectObjective-mapped

A data-processing application runs in private subnets and needs to read objects from Amazon S3 and write items to Amazon DynamoDB. The team currently routes all outbound traffic through a NAT Gateway, and monthly networking charges are rising. Which two changes will most directly reduce cost while keeping traffic on the AWS network? Select two.

Question 1mediummulti select
Full question →

A data-processing application runs in private subnets and needs to read objects from Amazon S3 and write items to Amazon DynamoDB. The team currently routes all outbound traffic through a NAT Gateway, and monthly networking charges are rising. Which two changes will most directly reduce cost while keeping traffic on the AWS network? Select two.

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Good practice is not just finding the correct option. The wrong answers often show the exact trap the exam wants you to fall into.

A

Best answer

Add an S3 gateway VPC endpoint to the private route tables.

An S3 gateway endpoint lets the instances reach S3 without sending traffic through the NAT Gateway. Gateway endpoints are the standard low-cost pattern for S3 access from private subnets and keep traffic on the AWS network.

B

Best answer

Add a DynamoDB gateway VPC endpoint to the private route tables.

A DynamoDB gateway endpoint provides private access to DynamoDB without internet egress or NAT Gateway charges. It is the most cost-effective way to reach DynamoDB from private subnets while keeping traffic on AWS-managed networking.

C

Distractor review

Add a second NAT Gateway in another Availability Zone.

A second NAT Gateway increases availability, but it also increases fixed hourly and data processing charges. It does not solve the core cost problem because the traffic still leaves the private subnets through NAT.

D

Distractor review

Move the instances into public subnets so they can reach AWS services directly.

Public subnets require internet exposure or public routing for the instances, which increases risk and is not needed for private service access. It also does not preserve the original private-subnet design objective.

E

Distractor review

Send private subnet traffic to S3 and DynamoDB through an Internet Gateway route.

An Internet Gateway is for public internet routing, not private service access from private subnets. That design would expose traffic unnecessarily and would not eliminate the operational cost of NAT Gateway usage.

Common exam trap

Common exam trap: usable hosts are not the same as total addresses

Subnetting questions often tempt you into counting all addresses. In normal IPv4 subnets, the network and broadcast addresses are not usable host addresses.

Technical deep dive

How to think about this question

Subnetting questions test whether you can identify the network, broadcast address, usable range, mask and correct subnet. Slow down enough to calculate the block size correctly.

KKey Concepts to Remember

  • CIDR notation defines the prefix length.
  • Block size helps identify subnet boundaries.
  • Network and broadcast addresses are not usable hosts in normal IPv4 subnets.
  • The required host count determines the smallest suitable subnet.

TExam Day Tips

  • Write the block size before choosing the subnet.
  • Check whether the question asks for hosts, subnets or a specific address range.
  • Do not confuse /24, /25, /26 and /27 host counts.

Related practice questions

Related SAA-C03 practice-question pages

Use these pages to review the topic behind this question. This is how one missed question becomes focused revision.

More questions from this exam

Keep practising from the same exam bank, or move into a focused topic page if this question exposed a weak area.

FAQ

Questions learners often ask

What does this SAA-C03 question test?

CIDR notation defines the prefix length.

What is the correct answer to this question?

The correct answer is: Add an S3 gateway VPC endpoint to the private route tables. — S3 and DynamoDB are both supported by gateway VPC endpoints, which let private subnet resources access those services without traversing a NAT Gateway. That cuts monthly networking charges immediately because you avoid NAT hourly charges and NAT data processing fees. It also keeps the traffic on the AWS network and preserves the private-subnet design. This is the most direct cost reduction for the scenario. Adding another NAT Gateway increases redundancy, not savings. Moving workloads to public subnets creates exposure and does not reduce service-access cost in a meaningful way. An Internet Gateway is not the right path for private-service access from private subnets. The correct answer is to use the service endpoints that are specifically designed to avoid NAT for S3 and DynamoDB.

What should I do if I get this SAA-C03 question wrong?

Then try more questions from the same exam bank and focus on understanding why the wrong options are tempting.

Discussion

Loading comments…

Sign in to join the discussion.