Courseiva
Design Resilient ArchitectureseasyMultiple ChoiceObjective-mapped

SAA-C03 Route 53 Failover Routing Practice Question

A company runs the same public API in two regions (Region A and Region B), each fronted by an ALB. They want Route 53 to automatically route clients to the Region B API when Region A becomes unhealthy, with minimal configuration effort. Which Route 53 approach should they use?

⚠ Common exam trap

A common mix-up: candidates confuse latency-based routing with failover capabilities, assuming latency routing will automatically avoid unhealthy endpoints, but it only optimizes for speed and requires health checks to be manually integrated via a separate routing policy.

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.

Correct answer & explanation

Use Route 53 failover routing with health checks for each region’s endpoint.

Route 53 failover routing with health checks is the correct choice because it automatically directs traffic to a secondary endpoint (Region B) when the primary endpoint (Region A) fails a health check. This provides active-passive failover with minimal configuration, as Route 53 monitors the health of each ALB and updates DNS responses accordingly without manual intervention.

Answer analysis

Option-by-option breakdown

For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.

  • Use a single Route 53 A record that points only to Region A’s ALB and manually update it after failures.

    Why it's wrong here

    A single-record setup does not provide automatic failover and still requires manual changes during outages.

  • Use Route 53 latency-based routing with separate records for each region.

    Why it's wrong here

    Latency-based routing optimizes user proximity, but it does not automatically fail over based on health checks.

  • Use Route 53 failover routing with health checks for each region’s endpoint.

    Why this is correct

    Failover routing works with health checks to move traffic from a primary endpoint to a secondary endpoint when the primary becomes unhealthy.

  • Use weighted routing and set the Region B weight to 0 to ensure it is only used when needed.

    Why it's wrong here

    Weighted routing does not react to health status. Weight changes are not automatic failover responses.

About these practice questions

This SAA-C03 question is part of Courseiva's 302-question bank — original exam-style content with full explanations and wrong-answer analysis, never real exam questions or exam dumps. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →

How Courseiva writes practice questions · Editorial policy

JA

Written by Johnson Ajibi, MSc IT Security

Senior Network & Security Engineer · founder of Courseiva

This SAA-C03 practice question is part of Courseiva's free Amazon Web Services certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the SAA-C03 exam.