Courseiva
ML Model Development →mediumMultiple Select

MLA-C01 ML Model Development Practice Question

A data scientist is using SageMaker Experiments to track multiple training runs for a PyTorch model. They want to compare metrics across runs and identify the best hyperparameters. Which TWO capabilities should they use? (Choose TWO.)

⚠ Common exam trap

MLA-C01 often tests the confusion between experiment tracking (SageMaker Experiments) and automated model building or monitoring services (Autopilot, Clarify, Model Monitor), so candidates must map each service to its exact purpose.

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.

Correct answer & explanation

✓

SageMaker Experiments list and search API to query runs by metric

Option A is correct because the SageMaker Experiments list and search API (e.g., search() with filters on metric values) lets the data scientist query and compare runs across an experiment by metric, which is exactly what is needed to rank runs and identify the best hyperparameters. Option B is correct because the SageMaker SDK's experiment logging capabilities (Run.log_metric, log_parameter, and log_artifact) record the metrics and hyperparameters for each training run so they can later be analyzed and compared. Option C (SageMaker Autopilot) is an automated machine learning service that builds and tunes models automatically, not a tool for comparing metrics across existing runs. Option D (SageMaker Clarify) provides bias detection and explainability, and Option E (SageMaker Model Monitor) detects drift in deployed models; neither supports run-to-run metric comparison or hyperparameter selection.

Answer analysis

Option-by-option breakdown

For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.

  • ✓

    SageMaker Experiments list and search API to query runs by metric

    Why this is correct

    The Experiments list and search API lets you query runs programmatically and filter or sort them by logged metric values, so you can retrieve the top-performing runs and compare their hyperparameter configurations. This directly supports identifying the best hyperparameters across many training runs.

  • ✓

    SageMaker SDK's experiment logging capabilities

    Why this is correct

    The SageMaker SDK logging capabilities record metrics, parameters and artefacts against each run during training, so every experiment trial is captured consistently. Those logged values then become the data compared across runs to identify which hyperparameters produced the best results.

  • ✗

    SageMaker Autopilot

    Why it's wrong here

    Autopilot automates algorithm selection and hyperparameter tuning to build a model, but it does not compare metrics across existing runs or surface the best hyperparameters from tracked experiments. It is tempting because tuning is the goal, and Autopilot would be correct when starting from raw tabular data without a chosen algorithm.

  • ✗

    SageMaker Clarify

    Why it's wrong here

    Clarify detects bias and explains predictions; it does not compare metrics across training runs or identify best hyperparameters. It is tempting because it operates on models and metrics, and would be correct for assessing fairness and feature attribution on a completed model, not for experiment run comparison.

  • ✗

    SageMaker Model Monitor

    Why it's wrong here

    Model Monitor detects data drift and quality issues on deployed endpoints; it does not compare training-run metrics or identify best hyperparameters. It is tempting because it also analyses model behaviour, and would be correct for ongoing production monitoring of a deployed model rather than experiment comparison during training.

About these practice questions

One of 665 original MLA-C01 practice questions on Courseiva, each with a full explanation and wrong-answer analysis — not exam dumps or protected exam content. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →

How Courseiva writes practice questions · Editorial policy

JA

Written and reviewed by Johnson Ajibi, MSc IT Security

Senior Network & Security Engineer · founder of Courseiva

Last reviewed September 2026 · checked against the official Amazon Web Services exam blueprint

This MLA-C01 practice question is part of Courseiva's free Amazon Web Services certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the MLA-C01 exam.