Courseiva
ML Model Development →easyMultiple Choice

MLA-C01 ML Model Development Practice Question

A data scientist is using SageMaker built-in XGBoost algorithm for a binary classification task. Which objective metric is MOST appropriate for SageMaker Automatic Model Tuning to maximize?

⚠ Common exam trap

The trap is mixing regression metrics (MAE, RMSE) and ranking metrics (NDCG) into a binary classification question — candidates who do not map metric families to task types will pick a plausible-sounding but wrong objective.

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.

Correct answer & explanation

✓

validation:auc

For binary classification, AUC (Area Under the ROC Curve) is the standard evaluation metric because it measures the model's ability to discriminate between the two classes across all classification thresholds, independent of class balance. SageMaker's built-in XGBoost exposes validation:auc as the objective metric for binary classification tuning. MAE and RMSE are regression metrics, and NDCG is a ranking metric, so none of them fit binary classification.

Answer analysis

Option-by-option breakdown

For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.

  • ✗

    validation:mae

    Why it's wrong here

    validation:mae measures mean absolute error for regression, so maximising it is meaningless for binary classification. It is tempting because MAE is a standard XGBoost metric, but classification requires validation:auc, which the algorithm reports for binary:logistic objectives.

  • ✗

    validation:rmse

    Why it's wrong here

    RMSE measures regression error magnitude, not binary classification quality, so maximising it optimises the wrong quantity. It is tempting because XGBoost supports regression objectives, but validation:rmse would be correct for a regression task, whereas binary classification needs validation:auc or validation:logloss.

  • ✗

    validation:ndcg

    Why it's wrong here

    Validation:ndcg measures ranking quality, so it cannot evaluate binary classification labels and gives no usable signal for tuning. It is tempting because NDCG is the standard objective for learning-to-rank jobs, such as search or recommendation models where ordered relevance grades matter, and would be the right choice there.

  • ✓

    validation:auc

    Why this is correct

    For binary classification, `validation:auc` maximises the area under the ROC curve, giving a threshold-independent measure of class separation. This satisfies the stem's requirement for the most appropriate tuning objective, since AUC handles imbalanced binary labels better than accuracy and is natively supported by SageMaker Automatic Model Tuning.

About these practice questions

One of 665 original MLA-C01 practice questions on Courseiva, each with a full explanation and wrong-answer analysis — not exam dumps or protected exam content. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →

How Courseiva writes practice questions · Editorial policy

JA

Written and reviewed by Johnson Ajibi, MSc IT Security

Senior Network & Security Engineer · founder of Courseiva

Last reviewed September 2026 · checked against the official Amazon Web Services exam blueprint

This MLA-C01 practice question is part of Courseiva's free Amazon Web Services certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the MLA-C01 exam.