- A
Compute features like lagged transaction amounts and rolling statistics based only on each transaction's past data up to that point.
This ensures no future information is used.
- B
Randomly shuffle the dataset before splitting into training and validation sets.
Why wrong: Shuffling temporal data breaks the time dependency and causes leakage.
- C
Generate features such as rolling averages and lag features using a sliding window of all available data.
Why wrong: Using all data including future to compute rolling windows causes leakage.
- D
Normalize the features using MinMaxScaler on the entire dataset before splitting into training and testing.
Why wrong: Fitting scaler on the entire dataset leaks information about future data ranges.
MLA-C01 Data Preparation for Machine Learning Practice Question
This MLA-C01 practice question tests your understanding of data preparation for machine learning. Read the scenario carefully and evaluate each option against the stated constraints before committing to an answer. After answering, compare your reasoning against the explanation and wrong-answer breakdown below. Once you have made your selection, read the full explanation to reinforce the concept and understand why each distractor is designed to mislead on exam day.
A data scientist is preprocessing time series data for a fraud detection model. The data includes transaction timestamps, amounts, and merchant IDs. The model should predict fraud within seconds of a transaction. The data scientist wants to avoid data leakage by not using future information to predict past events. Which data preparation practice should be implemented?
Answer choices
Why each option matters
Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.
Correct answer & explanation
Compute features like lagged transaction amounts and rolling statistics based only on each transaction's past data up to that point.
Option A is correct because it ensures that features are computed using only historical data available up to each transaction's timestamp, preventing any future information from leaking into the model. In time series fraud detection, using only past data for lagged amounts and rolling statistics respects the temporal order and avoids the model learning patterns that would not be available at prediction time.
Key principle: Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.
Answer analysis
Option-by-option breakdown
For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.
- ✓
Compute features like lagged transaction amounts and rolling statistics based only on each transaction's past data up to that point.
Why this is correct
This ensures no future information is used.
Related concept
Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.
- ✗
Randomly shuffle the dataset before splitting into training and validation sets.
Why it's wrong here
Shuffling temporal data breaks the time dependency and causes leakage.
- ✗
Generate features such as rolling averages and lag features using a sliding window of all available data.
Why it's wrong here
Using all data including future to compute rolling windows causes leakage.
- ✗
Normalize the features using MinMaxScaler on the entire dataset before splitting into training and testing.
Why it's wrong here
Fitting scaler on the entire dataset leaks information about future data ranges.
Common exam traps
Common exam trap: answer the scenario, not the keyword
AWS often tests the concept of temporal data leakage by presenting options that seem statistically sound (like shuffling or global normalization) but violate the time series assumption, leading candidates to overlook the need for chronological feature engineering.
Detailed technical explanation
How to think about this question
In time series preprocessing, the key is to compute features in a strictly chronological manner, often using expanding windows or rolling windows that only look backward. For fraud detection, this means each transaction's features (e.g., average transaction amount over the last hour) must be calculated from transactions that occurred before it, not including the current or future transactions. Real-world implementations often use tools like pandas' `shift()` and `rolling()` with closed='left' to ensure no lookahead bias.
KKey Concepts to Remember
- Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.
- Find the constraint that changes the correct option.
- Eliminate answers that are true in general but not in this case.
TExam Day Tips
- Watch for words such as best, first, most likely and least administrative effort.
- Review why wrong options are wrong, not only why the correct option is correct.
Key takeaway
Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.
Real-world example
How this comes up in practice
An e-commerce site experiences heavy traffic on Black Friday and near-zero traffic during off-peak weeks. Rather than provisioning permanent large VMs, the team uses auto-scaling groups that add capacity automatically under load and reduce it overnight. Questions like this test whether you understand elasticity, availability zones, and cloud compute scaling patterns.
What to study next
Got this wrong? Here's your next step.
Identify which exam domain this question belongs to, review the core concept, then practise similar questions from the same domain.
- →
Data Preparation for Machine Learning — study guide chapter
Learn the concepts, then practise the questions
- →
Data Preparation for Machine Learning practice questions
Targeted practice on this topic area only
- →
All MLA-C01 questions
507 questions across all exam domains
- →
AWS Certified Machine Learning Engineer Associate MLA-C01 study guide
Full concept coverage aligned to exam objectives
- →
MLA-C01 practice test guide
How to use practice tests most effectively before exam day
Related practice questions
Related MLA-C01 practice-question pages
Use these pages to review the topic behind this question. This is how one missed question becomes focused revision.
Data Preparation for Machine Learning practice questions
Practise MLA-C01 questions linked to Data Preparation for Machine Learning.
ML Model Development practice questions
Practise MLA-C01 questions linked to ML Model Development.
Deployment and Orchestration of ML Workflows practice questions
Practise MLA-C01 questions linked to Deployment and Orchestration of ML Workflows.
ML Solution Monitoring, Maintenance and Security practice questions
Practise MLA-C01 questions linked to ML Solution Monitoring, Maintenance and Security.
MLA-C01 fundamentals practice questions
Practise MLA-C01 questions linked to MLA-C01 fundamentals.
MLA-C01 scenario practice questions
Practise MLA-C01 questions linked to MLA-C01 scenario.
MLA-C01 troubleshooting practice questions
Practise MLA-C01 questions linked to MLA-C01 troubleshooting.
Practice this exam
Start a free MLA-C01 practice session
Short sessions build daily habit. Longer sessions build exam-day stamina. Try a timed session to simulate real conditions.
FAQ
Questions learners often ask
What does this MLA-C01 question test?
Data Preparation for Machine Learning — This question tests Data Preparation for Machine Learning — Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer..
What is the correct answer to this question?
The correct answer is: Compute features like lagged transaction amounts and rolling statistics based only on each transaction's past data up to that point. — Option A is correct because it ensures that features are computed using only historical data available up to each transaction's timestamp, preventing any future information from leaking into the model. In time series fraud detection, using only past data for lagged amounts and rolling statistics respects the temporal order and avoids the model learning patterns that would not be available at prediction time.
What should I do if I get this MLA-C01 question wrong?
Identify which exam domain this question belongs to, review the core concept, then practise similar questions from the same domain.
What is the key concept behind this question?
Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.
About these practice questions
Courseiva creates original exam-style practice questions with explanations and wrong-answer analysis. It does not publish real exam questions, exam dumps, or protected exam content. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →
Keep practising
More MLA-C01 practice questions
- A company is running a SageMaker endpoint serving multiple models. They need to monitor for data drift and model quality…
- A data scientist trained a logistic regression model on a dataset with 100 features. After training, the training accura…
- A team is training a deep learning model on Amazon SageMaker using a custom Docker container. Which three practices shou…
- A company is using SageMaker to train a neural network for image classification. The training job is taking too long. Th…
- A team is developing a model to predict customer churn. The dataset has 10,000 samples with 20 features. The target vari…
- A data engineer is processing a large dataset in Amazon S3 with AWS Glue ETL. The dataset contains timestamps in multipl…
Last reviewed: Jun 30, 2026
This MLA-C01 practice question is part of Courseiva's free Amazon Web Services certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the MLA-C01 exam.
Question Discussion
Share a tip, memory trick, or ask about the reasoning behind this question. Do not post real exam questions, leaked content, braindumps, or copyrighted exam material. Comments are moderated and may be removed without notice.
Sign in to join the discussion.