MLS-C01 Data Engineering Practice Question
Exhibit
{
"Version": "2012-10-17",
"Statement": [
{
"Effect": "Allow",
"Action": [
"s3:GetObject",
"s3:PutObject"
],
"Resource": "arn:aws:s3:::example-bucket/raw/*"
},
{
"Effect": "Allow",
"Action": [
"s3:GetObject",
"s3:PutObject"
],
"Resource": "arn:aws:s3:::example-bucket/processed/*"
},
{
"Effect": "Deny",
"Action": [
"s3:DeleteObject"
],
"Resource": "arn:aws:s3:::example-bucket/*"
}
]
}Refer to the exhibit. An IAM policy is attached to a data engineering role. The role is used by an AWS Glue ETL job that reads from 'raw/' and writes to 'processed/'. The job fails with an access denied error when trying to write to 'processed/'. What is the likely cause?
Answer choices
Why each option matters
Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.
Correct answer & explanation
✓
The Deny statement on s3:DeleteObject prevents overwriting objects.
The Deny statement on s3:DeleteObject explicitly denies the permission required to overwrite an existing object in S3. When an AWS Glue job writes to 'processed/' and attempts to overwrite an existing object, S3 requires both s3:PutObject and s3:DeleteObject permissions (since overwrite involves delete then put). The Deny on DeleteObject causes the access denied error. Option B is incorrect because the role is presumed to be attached correctly per the scenario. Option C is incorrect because the policy allows both GetObject and PutObject on the same resource, as is typical. Option D is incorrect because the ARN for the 'processed' folder is correctly specified; the error is due to the Deny, not incorrect ARN.
Answer analysis
Option-by-option breakdown
For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.
- ✓
The Deny statement on s3:DeleteObject prevents overwriting objects.
Why this is correct
If the job tries to overwrite an existing object, it needs DeleteObject permission.
- ✗
The role is not correctly attached to the Glue job.
Why it's wrong here
Assume attachment is correct.
- ✗
The policy does not allow both s3:GetObject and s3:PutObject on the same resource.
Why it's wrong here
The policy allows both on separate resources.
- ✗
The policy specifies incorrect ARN for the 'processed' folder.
Why it's wrong here
The ARN is correctly specified.
Quick reference
AWS S3 Storage Class Comparison
| Storage Class | Min Duration | Retrieval | Use Case |
|---|---|---|---|
| S3 Standard | None | Immediate | Frequently accessed data |
| S3 Standard-IA | 30 days | Immediate | Infrequent access, rapid retrieval |
| S3 One Zone-IA | 30 days | Immediate | Non-critical infrequent data |
| S3 Intelligent-Tiering | None | Immediate–hours | Unknown or changing access patterns |
| S3 Glacier Instant | 90 days | Milliseconds | Archive with instant retrieval |
| S3 Glacier Flexible | 90 days | Minutes–hours | Archive, flexible retrieval |
| S3 Glacier Deep Archive | 180 days | Hours | Long-term compliance archive |
Go deeper
Related to this question
About these practice questions
Courseiva writes every MLS-C01 question from scratch — 1,672 in total, each with an explanation and a wrong-answer breakdown. None are copied from real exams or dumps. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →
JA
Written by Johnson Ajibi, MSc IT Security
Senior Network & Security Engineer · founder of Courseiva
This MLS-C01 practice question is part of Courseiva's free Amazon Web Services certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the MLS-C01 exam.