Question 1,377 of 1,755
Exploratory Data AnalysiseasyMultiple SelectObjective-mapped

Quick Answer

The correct conclusions are that the two features have a strong linear relationship and that this indicates multicollinearity. A Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.95 measures the strength and direction of a linear association between two continuous variables, with values near +1 confirming a very strong positive linear trend. On the AWS Certified Machine Learning Specialty MLS-C01 exam, this concept tests your ability to distinguish correlation from causation and to recognize multicollinearity as a key concern during exploratory data analysis, especially when preparing features for linear models like regression. A common trap is assuming high correlation implies one feature causes the other, or that they move in opposite directions—both are false. Remember the memory tip: “High r means linear, not causal; check for collinearity before you model.”

MLS-C01 Exploratory Data Analysis Practice Question

This MLS-C01 practice question tests your understanding of exploratory data analysis. Read the scenario carefully and evaluate each option against the stated constraints before committing to an answer. After answering, compare your reasoning against the explanation and wrong-answer breakdown below. Once you have made your selection, read the full explanation to reinforce the concept and understand why each distractor is designed to mislead on exam day.

During EDA, a data scientist generates a pairplot of the dataset and observes that two features have a Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.95. Which TWO conclusions can the scientist draw from this observation? (Choose 2)

Question 1easymulti select
Full question →

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.

Correct answer & explanation

The two features may be multicollinear

Options B and C are correct because a high correlation indicates a strong linear relationship and suggests multicollinearity. Option A is wrong because correlation does not imply causation. Option D is wrong because a high positive correlation means they move together, not opposite. Option E is wrong because correlation measures linear relationship, not independence.

Key principle: Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.

Answer analysis

Option-by-option breakdown

For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.

  • The two features may be multicollinear

    Why this is correct

    High correlation between features can cause multicollinearity in regression models.

    Related concept

    Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.

  • The two features have a strong linear relationship

    Why this is correct

    A correlation of 0.95 indicates a strong positive linear relationship.

    Related concept

    Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.

  • The two features move in opposite directions

    Why it's wrong here

    A positive correlation means they move in the same direction.

  • The two features are statistically independent

    Why it's wrong here

    High correlation indicates dependence, not independence.

  • One feature causes the other

    Why it's wrong here

    Correlation does not imply causation.

Common exam traps

Common exam trap: answer the scenario, not the keyword

Many certification questions include familiar terms but test a specific constraint. Read the exact wording before choosing an answer that is generally true but wrong for this case.

Detailed technical explanation

How to think about this question

This question should be treated as a scenario, not a definition check. Identify the problem, the constraint and the best action. Then compare each option against those facts.

KKey Concepts to Remember

  • Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.
  • Find the constraint that changes the correct option.
  • Eliminate answers that are true in general but not in this case.
  • Use explanations to understand the rule behind the answer.

TExam Day Tips

  • Underline the problem statement mentally.
  • Watch for words such as best, first, most likely and least administrative effort.
  • Review why wrong options are wrong, not only why the correct option is correct.

Key takeaway

Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.

Real-world example

How this comes up in practice

A cloud solutions architect for a retail company is evaluating services for a new workload. The correct answer here reflects best practice for the specific scenario described — not a general cloud recommendation. Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option. Cloud exam questions reward reading the constraint carefully: the same technology can be right or wrong depending on the use case.

What to study next

Got this wrong? Here's your next step.

Identify which MLS-C01 exam domain this question belongs to, then review the specific concept being tested. Practise related questions in that domain and focus on understanding why each wrong answer is tempting — not just why the correct answer is right.

Related practice questions

Related MLS-C01 practice-question pages

Use these pages to review the topic behind this question. This is how one missed question becomes focused revision.

Practice this exam

Start a free MLS-C01 practice session

Short sessions build daily habit. Longer sessions build exam-day stamina. Try a timed session to simulate real conditions.

FAQ

Questions learners often ask

What does this MLS-C01 question test?

Exploratory Data Analysis — This question tests Exploratory Data Analysis — Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer..

What is the correct answer to this question?

The correct answer is: The two features may be multicollinear — Options B and C are correct because a high correlation indicates a strong linear relationship and suggests multicollinearity. Option A is wrong because correlation does not imply causation. Option D is wrong because a high positive correlation means they move together, not opposite. Option E is wrong because correlation measures linear relationship, not independence.

What should I do if I get this MLS-C01 question wrong?

Identify which MLS-C01 exam domain this question belongs to, then review the specific concept being tested. Practise related questions in that domain and focus on understanding why each wrong answer is tempting — not just why the correct answer is right.

What is the key concept behind this question?

Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.

About these practice questions

Courseiva creates original exam-style practice questions with explanations and wrong-answer analysis. It does not publish real exam questions, exam dumps, or protected exam content. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →

How Courseiva writes practice questions · Editorial policy

Keep practising

More MLS-C01 practice questions

Last reviewed: Jun 20, 2026

Question Discussion

Share a tip, memory trick, or ask about the reasoning behind this question. Do not post real exam questions, leaked content, braindumps, or copyrighted exam material. Comments are moderated and may be removed without notice.

Loading comments…

Sign in to join the discussion.

This MLS-C01 practice question is part of Courseiva's free Amazon Web Services certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the MLS-C01 exam.