Courseiva
Exploratory Data AnalysismediumMultiple ChoiceObjective-mapped

MLS-C01 Exploratory Data Analysis Practice Question

A data scientist is exploring a dataset stored in an Amazon S3 bucket. The dataset contains both numerical and categorical features. The scientist wants to compute summary statistics (mean, median, standard deviation) for all numerical features and count the distinct values for categorical features. Which AWS service is most appropriate for this task with minimal coding?

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.

Correct answer & explanation

AWS Glue DataBrew

AWS Glue DataBrew is the most appropriate service for this task because it provides a visual, no-code interface for data preparation and profiling. It can automatically compute summary statistics (mean, median, standard deviation) for numerical features and count distinct values for categorical features without writing any code. Amazon Athena requires writing SQL queries, which is not 'minimal coding' and is less suitable for profiling. AWS Glue ETL jobs require writing Python or Scala code, so it is more code-intensive. Amazon SageMaker Data Wrangler also requires some setup and integration with SageMaker, and while it can perform similar tasks, it is not as straightforward for simple profiling as DataBrew. Amazon EMR requires managing clusters and writing code, making it the least minimal coding option.

Answer analysis

Option-by-option breakdown

For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.

  • Amazon Athena

    Why it's wrong here

    Amazon Athena requires writing SQL queries, which involves coding and is not minimal for profiling tasks.

  • AWS Glue ETL jobs

    Why it's wrong here

    AWS Glue ETL jobs require writing Python or Scala code, so it is more code-intensive than DataBrew.

  • AWS Glue DataBrew

    Why this is correct

    AWS Glue DataBrew provides a visual, no-code interface for data profiling, making it ideal for minimal coding.

  • Amazon SageMaker Data Wrangler

    Why it's wrong here

    Amazon SageMaker Data Wrangler requires some coding and setup, making it less straightforward for simple profiling.

  • Amazon EMR

    Why it's wrong here

    Amazon EMR involves managing clusters and writing code, making it the least minimal coding option.

Quick reference

AWS S3 Storage Class Comparison

Storage ClassMin DurationRetrievalUse Case
S3 StandardNoneImmediateFrequently accessed data
S3 Standard-IA30 daysImmediateInfrequent access, rapid retrieval
S3 One Zone-IA30 daysImmediateNon-critical infrequent data
S3 Intelligent-TieringNoneImmediate–hoursUnknown or changing access patterns
S3 Glacier Instant90 daysMillisecondsArchive with instant retrieval
S3 Glacier Flexible90 daysMinutes–hoursArchive, flexible retrieval
S3 Glacier Deep Archive180 daysHoursLong-term compliance archive

About these practice questions

Courseiva writes every MLS-C01 question from scratch — 1,672 in total, each with an explanation and a wrong-answer breakdown. None are copied from real exams or dumps. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →

How Courseiva writes practice questions · Editorial policy

JA

Written by Johnson Ajibi, MSc IT Security

Senior Network & Security Engineer · founder of Courseiva

This MLS-C01 practice question is part of Courseiva's free Amazon Web Services certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the MLS-C01 exam.