Question 1,727 of 1,755
Exploratory Data AnalysishardMultiple ChoiceObjective-mapped

MLS-C01 Exploratory Data Analysis Practice Question

This MLS-C01 practice question tests your understanding of exploratory data analysis. Compare every option against the stated constraints before choosing — the best answer satisfies all requirements, not just the most obvious one. After answering, compare your reasoning against the explanation and wrong-answer breakdown below. Once you have made your selection, read the full explanation to reinforce the concept and understand why each distractor is designed to mislead on exam day.

A data scientist is analyzing a dataset with missing values. The missing data mechanism is missing at random (MAR). Which imputation method is most appropriate to preserve relationships between variables?

Question 1hardmultiple choice
Full question →

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.

Correct answer & explanation

Use multiple imputation by chained equations (MICE).

Option D is correct because multiple imputation by chained equations (MICE) handles MAR well by modeling each variable with missing values conditional on others. Option A is wrong because mean imputation underestimates variance. Option B is wrong because dropping rows with missing data reduces sample size and can introduce bias. Option C is wrong because KNN imputation assumes data are MCAR and may not be optimal for MAR.

Key principle: OSPF neighbour adjacency depends on matching area, hello/dead timers, network type, and authentication — IP reachability alone is not enough.

Answer analysis

Option-by-option breakdown

For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.

  • Remove all rows with any missing values.

    Why it's wrong here

    Deletion reduces sample size and may introduce bias if data are MAR.

  • Use k-nearest neighbors imputation.

    Why it's wrong here

    KNN imputation works best when missing is MCAR, not necessarily MAR.

  • Use multiple imputation by chained equations (MICE).

    Why this is correct

    MICE models each variable with missing values conditional on others, suitable for MAR.

    Related concept

    OSPF neighbours must agree on key parameters.

  • Replace missing values with the mean of the column.

    Why it's wrong here

    Mean imputation underestimates variance and distorts relationships.

Common exam traps

Common exam trap: OSPF can fail even when IP connectivity looks correct

OSPF neighbour formation depends on matching areas, timers, network type, authentication and passive-interface behaviour. Do not choose an answer only because the devices can ping.

Detailed technical explanation

How to think about this question

OSPF questions usually test the details that control adjacency and route selection. Read the neighbour state, area, router ID and interface configuration before deciding what is wrong.

KKey Concepts to Remember

  • OSPF neighbours must agree on key parameters.
  • Router ID selection can affect neighbour relationships and LSDB output.
  • OSPF cost influences the preferred path.
  • A route can appear in OSPF information but not become the installed route.

TExam Day Tips

  • Check area mismatch first when OSPF adjacency fails.
  • Review passive interfaces when a network is advertised but no neighbour forms.
  • Use show ip ospf neighbor and show ip route clues carefully.

Key takeaway

OSPF neighbour adjacency depends on matching area, hello/dead timers, network type, and authentication — IP reachability alone is not enough.

Real-world example

How this comes up in practice

A cloud solutions architect for a retail company is evaluating services for a new workload. The correct answer here reflects best practice for the specific scenario described — not a general cloud recommendation. OSPF neighbour adjacency depends on matching area, hello/dead timers, network type, and authentication — IP reachability alone is not enough. Cloud exam questions reward reading the constraint carefully: the same technology can be right or wrong depending on the use case.

What to study next

Got this wrong? Here's your next step.

Review OSPF neighbour requirements — matching area type, hello and dead timers, network type, stub flags, and authentication. Study show ip ospf neighbor states (INIT, 2-WAY, FULL). Then practise related MLS-C01 OSPF questions on adjacency and route selection.

Related practice questions

Related MLS-C01 practice-question pages

Use these pages to review the topic behind this question. This is how one missed question becomes focused revision.

Practice this exam

Start a free MLS-C01 practice session

Short sessions build daily habit. Longer sessions build exam-day stamina. Try a timed session to simulate real conditions.

FAQ

Questions learners often ask

What does this MLS-C01 question test?

Exploratory Data Analysis — This question tests Exploratory Data Analysis — OSPF neighbours must agree on key parameters..

What is the correct answer to this question?

The correct answer is: Use multiple imputation by chained equations (MICE). — Option D is correct because multiple imputation by chained equations (MICE) handles MAR well by modeling each variable with missing values conditional on others. Option A is wrong because mean imputation underestimates variance. Option B is wrong because dropping rows with missing data reduces sample size and can introduce bias. Option C is wrong because KNN imputation assumes data are MCAR and may not be optimal for MAR.

What should I do if I get this MLS-C01 question wrong?

Review OSPF neighbour requirements — matching area type, hello and dead timers, network type, stub flags, and authentication. Study show ip ospf neighbor states (INIT, 2-WAY, FULL). Then practise related MLS-C01 OSPF questions on adjacency and route selection.

What is the key concept behind this question?

OSPF neighbours must agree on key parameters.

About these practice questions

Courseiva creates original exam-style practice questions with explanations and wrong-answer analysis. It does not publish real exam questions, exam dumps, or protected exam content. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →

How Courseiva writes practice questions · Editorial policy

Last reviewed: Jun 20, 2026

Question Discussion

Share a tip, memory trick, or ask about the reasoning behind this question. Do not post real exam questions, leaked content, braindumps, or copyrighted exam material. Comments are moderated and may be removed without notice.

Loading comments…

Sign in to join the discussion.

This MLS-C01 practice question is part of Courseiva's free Amazon Web Services certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the MLS-C01 exam.