- A
Decrease the threshold to 0.1
Why wrong: Unnecessarily decreases precision.
- B
Increase the threshold to 0.7
Why wrong: Increasing threshold would decrease recall, missing the goal.
- C
Keep the threshold at 0.5
Recall is already 95%, meeting the requirement.
- D
Decrease the threshold to 0.3
Why wrong: Decreasing threshold may increase recall but could reduce precision; recall is already at goal.
Quick Answer
The answer is to keep the threshold at 0.5. The model already achieves a recall of 95/100 = 0.95, meeting the requirement without any adjustment. Recall, also known as true positive rate, is calculated as TP/(TP+FN); here, with 95 true positives and only 5 false negatives out of 100 actual failures, the recall is exactly 0.95. On the AWS Certified Machine Learning Specialty MLS-C01 exam, this question tests your understanding that threshold adjustment for recall in SageMaker is only necessary when the current recall falls below the target—lowering the threshold increases recall by capturing more positives but often at the cost of precision. A common trap is assuming you must always lower the threshold to boost recall, but if recall is already sufficient, no change is needed. Memory tip: “Check recall first—if it’s already 95, keep the threshold alive.”
MLS-C01 Modeling Practice Question
This MLS-C01 practice question tests your understanding of modeling. Read the scenario carefully and evaluate each option against the stated constraints before committing to an answer. After answering, compare your reasoning against the explanation and wrong-answer breakdown below. Once you have made your selection, read the full explanation to reinforce the concept and understand why each distractor is designed to mislead on exam day.
A company is using Amazon SageMaker to deploy a machine learning model that predicts equipment failure. The model is a binary classifier that outputs a probability. The company wants to set a threshold such that the model correctly identifies 95% of actual failures (recall >= 0.95). The model's precision at the current threshold of 0.5 is 0.7. The data scientist evaluates the model on a test set and obtains the following confusion matrix at threshold 0.5: TP=95, FN=5, FP=40, TN=860. The total actual positives are 100. Which threshold adjustment should the data scientist make to achieve the recall goal?
Answer choices
Why each option matters
Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.
Correct answer & explanation
Keep the threshold at 0.5
Option B is correct. Lowering the threshold increases recall by classifying more instances as positive, which reduces false negatives. Currently recall is 95/100 = 0.95, so recall is already 95%. Actually, recall is already 95% at threshold 0.5. So the requirement is already met. But the question might imply that recall needs to be at least 95%, which it is. However, the stem says 'the company wants to set a threshold such that the model correctly identifies 95% of actual failures (recall >= 0.95)'. At threshold 0.5, recall is 95/100 = 0.95, so it meets the requirement. So no adjustment is needed. But the options include 'Keep the threshold at 0.5' as option D. So D is correct. Let me check: If recall is already 0.95, then no change needed. So answer D.
Key principle: Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.
Answer analysis
Option-by-option breakdown
For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.
- ✗
Decrease the threshold to 0.1
Why it's wrong here
Unnecessarily decreases precision.
- ✗
Increase the threshold to 0.7
Why it's wrong here
Increasing threshold would decrease recall, missing the goal.
- ✓
Keep the threshold at 0.5
Why this is correct
Recall is already 95%, meeting the requirement.
Related concept
Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.
- ✗
Decrease the threshold to 0.3
Why it's wrong here
Decreasing threshold may increase recall but could reduce precision; recall is already at goal.
Common exam traps
Common exam trap: answer the scenario, not the keyword
Many certification questions include familiar terms but test a specific constraint. Read the exact wording before choosing an answer that is generally true but wrong for this case.
Detailed technical explanation
How to think about this question
This question should be treated as a scenario, not a definition check. Identify the problem, the constraint and the best action. Then compare each option against those facts.
KKey Concepts to Remember
- Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.
- Find the constraint that changes the correct option.
- Eliminate answers that are true in general but not in this case.
- Use explanations to understand the rule behind the answer.
TExam Day Tips
- Underline the problem statement mentally.
- Watch for words such as best, first, most likely and least administrative effort.
- Review why wrong options are wrong, not only why the correct option is correct.
Key takeaway
Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.
Real-world example
How this comes up in practice
A cloud solutions architect for a retail company is evaluating services for a new workload. The correct answer here reflects best practice for the specific scenario described — not a general cloud recommendation. Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option. Cloud exam questions reward reading the constraint carefully: the same technology can be right or wrong depending on the use case.
What to study next
Got this wrong? Here's your next step.
Identify which MLS-C01 exam domain this question belongs to, then review the specific concept being tested. Practise related questions in that domain and focus on understanding why each wrong answer is tempting — not just why the correct answer is right.
- →
Modeling — study guide chapter
Learn the concepts, then practise the questions
- →
Modeling practice questions
Targeted practice on this topic area only
- →
All MLS-C01 questions
1,755 questions across all exam domains
- →
AWS Certified Machine Learning Specialty MLS-C01 study guide
Full concept coverage aligned to exam objectives
- →
MLS-C01 practice test guide
How to use practice tests most effectively before exam day
Related practice questions
Related MLS-C01 practice-question pages
Use these pages to review the topic behind this question. This is how one missed question becomes focused revision.
Data Engineering practice questions
Practise MLS-C01 questions linked to Data Engineering.
Machine Learning Implementation and Operations practice questions
Practise MLS-C01 questions linked to Machine Learning Implementation and Operations.
Modeling practice questions
Practise MLS-C01 questions linked to Modeling.
Exploratory Data Analysis practice questions
Practise MLS-C01 questions linked to Exploratory Data Analysis.
MLS-C01 fundamentals practice questions
Practise MLS-C01 questions linked to MLS-C01 fundamentals.
MLS-C01 scenario practice questions
Practise MLS-C01 questions linked to MLS-C01 scenario.
MLS-C01 troubleshooting practice questions
Practise MLS-C01 questions linked to MLS-C01 troubleshooting.
Practice this exam
Start a free MLS-C01 practice session
Short sessions build daily habit. Longer sessions build exam-day stamina. Try a timed session to simulate real conditions.
FAQ
Questions learners often ask
What does this MLS-C01 question test?
Modeling — This question tests Modeling — Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer..
What is the correct answer to this question?
The correct answer is: Keep the threshold at 0.5 — Option B is correct. Lowering the threshold increases recall by classifying more instances as positive, which reduces false negatives. Currently recall is 95/100 = 0.95, so recall is already 95%. Actually, recall is already 95% at threshold 0.5. So the requirement is already met. But the question might imply that recall needs to be at least 95%, which it is. However, the stem says 'the company wants to set a threshold such that the model correctly identifies 95% of actual failures (recall >= 0.95)'. At threshold 0.5, recall is 95/100 = 0.95, so it meets the requirement. So no adjustment is needed. But the options include 'Keep the threshold at 0.5' as option D. So D is correct. Let me check: If recall is already 0.95, then no change needed. So answer D.
What should I do if I get this MLS-C01 question wrong?
Identify which MLS-C01 exam domain this question belongs to, then review the specific concept being tested. Practise related questions in that domain and focus on understanding why each wrong answer is tempting — not just why the correct answer is right.
What is the key concept behind this question?
Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.
About these practice questions
Courseiva creates original exam-style practice questions with explanations and wrong-answer analysis. It does not publish real exam questions, exam dumps, or protected exam content. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →
Last reviewed: Jun 20, 2026
This MLS-C01 practice question is part of Courseiva's free Amazon Web Services certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the MLS-C01 exam.
Question Discussion
Share a tip, memory trick, or ask about the reasoning behind this question. Do not post real exam questions, leaked content, braindumps, or copyrighted exam material. Comments are moderated and may be removed without notice.
Sign in to join the discussion.