Courseiva
Security and CompliancehardMultiple ChoiceObjective-mapped

DOP-C02 Security and Compliance Practice Question

A company wants to enforce that S3 buckets are not publicly accessible. Which AWS service can continuously monitor and automatically remediate non-compliant buckets?

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.

Correct answer & explanation

AWS Config

AWS Config can evaluate S3 bucket policies against managed rules like 's3-bucket-public-read-prohibited' and 's3-bucket-public-write-prohibited'. It can automatically remediate non-compliant buckets using AWS Systems Manager Automation or custom remediation actions. Option A is correct. Amazon Macie is for sensitive data discovery, not for continuous monitoring of public access. AWS Security Hub aggregates security findings but does not automatically remediate. AWS Trusted Advisor provides checks but requires manual remediation.

Answer analysis

Option-by-option breakdown

For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.

  • AWS Config

    Why this is correct

    AWS Config is the correct service because it offers managed rules specifically for detecting S3 public access, such as s3-bucket-public-read-prohibited and s3-bucket-public-write-prohibited. These rules can be evaluated continuously, and when a violation is found, AWS Config can automatically invoke remediation actions through SSM automation documents, such as removing the public policy. This provides a continuous, automated enforcement mechanism that goes beyond simple detection, making it the only listed service capable of enforcing the requirement.

  • Amazon Macie

    Why it's wrong here

    Amazon Macie is incorrect because its primary purpose is to discover and protect sensitive data using machine learning, not to enforce S3 bucket public access policies. While it can monitor for unusual access patterns, it cannot evaluate bucket ACLs or bucket policies to determine whether a bucket is publicly accessible, nor does it have any remediation actions to alter bucket settings. Enforcement of public access controls requires a service that can evaluate configurations and trigger corrective actions, which Macie lacks.

  • AWS Security Hub

    Why it's wrong here

    AWS Security Hub is wrong for this use case because it is a security posture management service that aggregates findings from multiple AWS services, including AWS Config, into a consolidated dashboard. It does not inherently evaluate S3 bucket permissions or enforce public access rules on its own; rather, it collects and displays compliance statuses from services like Config. While Security Hub can send findings to EventBridge to trigger custom remediation, that requires additional setup and is not its native capability, so it does not enforce public access directly.

  • AWS Trusted Advisor

    Why it's wrong here

    AWS Trusted Advisor is not suitable because it offers only periodic, advisory checks, such as the S3 bucket public read/write checks, but it never performs automated remediation or enforcement. Its role is to provide recommendations for cost optimization, security, and performance, and any corrective action must be manually performed by the user. Moreover, Trusted Advisor checks are run on a limited schedule and do not provide real-time continuous enforcement, making it inadequate for a policy that requires S3 buckets to not be publicly accessible.

Quick reference

AWS S3 Storage Class Comparison

Storage ClassMin DurationRetrievalUse Case
S3 StandardNoneImmediateFrequently accessed data
S3 Standard-IA30 daysImmediateInfrequent access, rapid retrieval
S3 One Zone-IA30 daysImmediateNon-critical infrequent data
S3 Intelligent-TieringNoneImmediate–hoursUnknown or changing access patterns
S3 Glacier Instant90 daysMillisecondsArchive with instant retrieval
S3 Glacier Flexible90 daysMinutes–hoursArchive, flexible retrieval
S3 Glacier Deep Archive180 daysHoursLong-term compliance archive

About these practice questions

This DOP-C02 question is part of Courseiva's 1,013-question bank — original exam-style content with full explanations and wrong-answer analysis, never real exam questions or exam dumps. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →

How Courseiva writes practice questions · Editorial policy

JA

Written by Johnson Ajibi, MSc IT Security

Senior Network & Security Engineer · founder of Courseiva

This DOP-C02 practice question is part of Courseiva's free Amazon Web Services certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the DOP-C02 exam.