Courseiva
Question 840 of 1,663
Monitoring and TroubleshootinghardMultiple ChoiceObjective-mapped

DBS-C01 Monitoring and Troubleshooting Practice Question

An application using Amazon DynamoDB is experiencing higher than expected read costs. The table uses on-demand capacity mode. The read pattern is mostly fetching small items (1 KB) using GetItem. Which of the following is the most cost-effective optimization?

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.

Correct answer & explanation

Switch to eventually consistent reads for GetItem operations

The most cost-effective because eventually consistent reads consume half the read capacity units (0.5 RCU for items up to 4 KB) compared to strongly consistent reads (1 RCU). Since items are small (1 KB) and the table uses on-demand capacity, halving RCU consumption directly reduces read costs. Option A: Switching to provisioned capacity with auto scaling adds complexity and may not reduce costs if traffic is unpredictable; on-demand is already suitable for variable workloads. Option B: Application-level compression would not significantly reduce RCU consumption because items are already under the 4 KB RCU threshold. Option C: Adding DAX introduces additional cost and primarily improves latency, not read cost, as DAX still charges for reads from DynamoDB.

Answer analysis

Option-by-option breakdown

For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.

  • Change the table to provisioned capacity mode with auto scaling

    Why it's wrong here

    On-demand is already cost-effective for unpredictable traffic; provisioned may not save money.

  • Compress the items using application-level compression

    Why it's wrong here

    Compression is not supported by DynamoDB; items are stored as-is.

  • Use DAX to cache the read results

    Why it's wrong here

    DAX adds cost and does not reduce RCU consumption for cached reads.

  • Switch to eventually consistent reads for GetItem operations

    Why this is correct

    Eventually consistent reads consume half the RCU of strongly consistent reads.

About these practice questions

Courseiva creates original exam-style practice questions with explanations and wrong-answer analysis. It does not publish real exam questions, exam dumps, or protected exam content. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →

How Courseiva writes practice questions · Editorial policy

Last reviewed: Jun 20, 2026

Question Discussion

Share a tip, memory trick, or ask about the reasoning behind this question. Do not post real exam questions, leaked content, braindumps, or copyrighted exam material. Comments are moderated and may be removed without notice.

Loading comments…

Sign in to join the discussion.

This DBS-C01 practice question is part of Courseiva's free Amazon Web Services certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the DBS-C01 exam.