Question 817 of 1,730
Monitoring and TroubleshootinghardMultiple ChoiceObjective-mapped

DBS-C01 Monitoring and Troubleshooting Practice Question

This DBS-C01 practice question tests your understanding of monitoring and troubleshooting. Read the scenario carefully and evaluate each option against the stated constraints before committing to an answer. After answering, compare your reasoning against the explanation and wrong-answer breakdown below. Once you have made your selection, read the full explanation to reinforce the concept and understand why each distractor is designed to mislead on exam day.

A financial services company is using Amazon Aurora MySQL as its primary database. The database has a table 'transactions' that receives high inserts during business hours. The table is partitioned by date. Recently, the application team noticed an increase in lock wait timeouts. The database specialist reviewed the InnoDB status and found that there are frequent gap locks on the 'transaction_date' column. The isolation level is REPEATABLE READ. What should the specialist do to reduce lock waits while maintaining data consistency?

Clue words in this question

Noticing these words before you look at the options changes how you read each choice.

  • Clue: "primary"

    Why it matters: Asks for the main purpose or function, not a secondary benefit. Eliminate answers that describe side-effects or partial functions.

Question 1hardmultiple choice
Full question →

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.

Correct answer & explanation

Change the transaction isolation level to READ COMMITTED.

Option A is correct because changing the isolation level to READ COMMITTED eliminates gap locks for non-unique indexes, reducing lock contention. Option B is wrong because increasing innodb_lock_wait_timeout only increases timeout, not reduces locks. Option C is wrong because adding an index on transaction_date may increase lock granularity? Actually, if the index is not unique, gap locks still occur. Option D is wrong because partitioning does not affect gap locks.

Key principle: NAT direction and interface roles matter as much as the IP address mapping. Inside/outside designation controls which traffic is translated.

Answer analysis

Option-by-option breakdown

For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.

  • Add a secondary index on transaction_date.

    Why it's wrong here

    If not unique, gap locks can still occur in REPEATABLE READ.

  • Increase the innodb_lock_wait_timeout parameter.

    Why it's wrong here

    This only allows longer waits, does not reduce lock contention.

  • Modify the partitioning key to use a hash-based partition.

    Why it's wrong here

    Partitioning does not affect locking behavior.

  • Change the transaction isolation level to READ COMMITTED.

    Why this is correct

    READ COMMITTED avoids gap locks for locking reads.

    Clue confirmation

    The clue word "primary" in the question point toward this answer.

    Related concept

    Static NAT maps one inside address to one outside address.

Common exam traps

Common exam trap: NAT rules depend on direction and matching traffic

NAT is not only about the public address. The inside/outside interface roles and the ACL or rule that matches traffic are just as important.

Detailed technical explanation

How to think about this question

NAT questions usually test address translation, overload/PAT behaviour, static mappings and whether the right traffic is being translated. Read the interface direction and address terms carefully.

KKey Concepts to Remember

  • Static NAT maps one inside address to one outside address.
  • PAT allows many inside hosts to share one public address using ports.
  • Inside local and inside global describe the private and translated addresses.
  • NAT ACLs identify traffic for translation, not always security filtering.

TExam Day Tips

  • Identify inside and outside interfaces first.
  • Check whether the scenario needs static NAT, dynamic NAT or PAT.
  • Do not confuse NAT matching ACLs with normal packet-filtering intent.

Key takeaway

NAT direction and interface roles matter as much as the IP address mapping. Inside/outside designation controls which traffic is translated.

Real-world example

How this comes up in practice

A cloud solutions architect for a retail company is evaluating services for a new workload. The correct answer here reflects best practice for the specific scenario described — not a general cloud recommendation. NAT direction and interface roles matter as much as the IP address mapping. Inside/outside designation controls which traffic is translated. Cloud exam questions reward reading the constraint carefully: the same technology can be right or wrong depending on the use case.

What to study next

Got this wrong? Here's your next step.

Review the four NAT address types (inside local, inside global, outside local, outside global), PAT port overload, and static vs dynamic NAT use cases. Then practise related DBS-C01 NAT questions on configuration and troubleshooting.

Related practice questions

Related DBS-C01 practice-question pages

Use these pages to review the topic behind this question. This is how one missed question becomes focused revision.

Practice this exam

Start a free DBS-C01 practice session

Short sessions build daily habit. Longer sessions build exam-day stamina. Try a timed session to simulate real conditions.

FAQ

Questions learners often ask

What does this DBS-C01 question test?

Monitoring and Troubleshooting — This question tests Monitoring and Troubleshooting — Static NAT maps one inside address to one outside address..

What is the correct answer to this question?

The correct answer is: Change the transaction isolation level to READ COMMITTED. — Option A is correct because changing the isolation level to READ COMMITTED eliminates gap locks for non-unique indexes, reducing lock contention. Option B is wrong because increasing innodb_lock_wait_timeout only increases timeout, not reduces locks. Option C is wrong because adding an index on transaction_date may increase lock granularity? Actually, if the index is not unique, gap locks still occur. Option D is wrong because partitioning does not affect gap locks.

What should I do if I get this DBS-C01 question wrong?

Review the four NAT address types (inside local, inside global, outside local, outside global), PAT port overload, and static vs dynamic NAT use cases. Then practise related DBS-C01 NAT questions on configuration and troubleshooting.

Are there clue words in this question I should notice?

Yes — watch for: "primary". Asks for the main purpose or function, not a secondary benefit. Eliminate answers that describe side-effects or partial functions.

What is the key concept behind this question?

Static NAT maps one inside address to one outside address.

About these practice questions

Courseiva creates original exam-style practice questions with explanations and wrong-answer analysis. It does not publish real exam questions, exam dumps, or protected exam content. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →

How Courseiva writes practice questions · Editorial policy

Keep practising

More DBS-C01 practice questions

Last reviewed: Jun 20, 2026

Question Discussion

Share a tip, memory trick, or ask about the reasoning behind this question. Do not post real exam questions, leaked content, braindumps, or copyrighted exam material. Comments are moderated and may be removed without notice.

Loading comments…

Sign in to join the discussion.

This DBS-C01 practice question is part of Courseiva's free Amazon Web Services certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the DBS-C01 exam.