Question 290 of 1,786
Data Security and GovernancemediumMultiple ChoiceObjective-mapped

Quick Answer

The correct answer is to create an LF-tag 'access_level' with values 'analyst' and 'admin', grant SELECT on the 'customer' table to the tag value 'analyst', and then associate that LF-tag with the table. This works because Lake Formation LF-tag access control uses key-value metadata tags as the basis for permissions, allowing you to grant access to a tag rather than to individual users or roles. When a principal has the matching tag, they inherit the permissions associated with it, enabling fine-grained, attribute-based access control without managing per-user grants. On the AWS Certified Data Engineer Associate DEA-C01 exam, this scenario tests your understanding that LF-tags decouple permissions from identity—a common trap is trying to grant permissions directly to a user or role instead of to the tag value. Remember the memory tip: "Tag the data, then grant to the tag, not the user."

DEA-C01 Data Security and Governance Practice Question

This DEA-C01 practice question tests your understanding of data security and governance. Match the stated requirement to the specific cloud service, access model, or configuration option — many options are valid in isolation but not for this scenario. After answering, compare your reasoning against the explanation and wrong-answer breakdown below. Once you have made your selection, read the full explanation to reinforce the concept and understand why each distractor is designed to mislead on exam day.

A company uses AWS Lake Formation to manage data lake permissions. The data lake contains sensitive customer data in the 'customer' database. The security team wants to ensure that only users with a specific tag 'access_level=analyst' can query the 'customer' table. Which combination of steps should the data engineer take to enforce this?

Question 1mediummultiple choice
Read the full NAT/PAT explanation →

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.

Correct answer & explanation

In Lake Formation, create an LF-tag 'access_level' with values 'analyst' and 'admin'. Grant 'SELECT' permission on the 'customer' table to the tag value 'analyst'. Associate the LF-tag with the 'customer' table.

Option A is correct because Lake Formation LF-tags allow you to define metadata tags (key-value pairs) and grant permissions to those tags. By creating an LF-tag 'access_level' with values 'analyst' and 'admin', granting SELECT on the 'customer' table to the tag value 'analyst', and associating that LF-tag with the table, only principals who have the tag 'access_level=analyst' (or are granted via the tag) can query the table. This enforces tag-based access control at the Lake Formation permission layer, which is the intended mechanism for fine-grained, attribute-based access control in Lake Formation.

Key principle: Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.

Answer analysis

Option-by-option breakdown

For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.

  • In Lake Formation, create an LF-tag 'access_level' with values 'analyst' and 'admin'. Grant 'SELECT' permission on the 'customer' table to the tag value 'analyst'. Associate the LF-tag with the 'customer' table.

    Why this is correct

    This uses Lake Formation TBAC to restrict access based on the user's tag.

    Related concept

    Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.

  • Create an IAM policy that conditionally allows 'glue:GetTable' based on the tag 'access_level=analyst'.

    Why it's wrong here

    IAM policies cannot enforce Lake Formation table-level permissions; Lake Formation manages grants.

  • Apply a bucket policy on the S3 location of the 'customer' table that allows access only if the request carries the tag 'access_level=analyst'.

    Why it's wrong here

    S3 bucket policies do not control Lake Formation permissions; Lake Formation manages access independent of S3 policies.

  • Use Lake Formation column-level filters to restrict access to columns based on the tag 'access_level=analyst'.

    Why it's wrong here

    Lake Formation column-level filters do not support tag conditions; they filter columns by name or data type.

Common exam traps

Common exam trap: answer the scenario, not the keyword

The trap here is that candidates often confuse IAM tag-based policies (Option B) or S3 bucket policies (Option C) with Lake Formation's native LF-tag mechanism, not realizing that LF-tags are a Lake Formation-specific construct that must be managed within Lake Formation itself, not at the IAM or S3 level.

Detailed technical explanation

How to think about this question

Lake Formation LF-tags are metadata key-value pairs that you associate with Data Catalog resources (databases, tables, columns). When you grant permissions to an LF-tag value, any principal that has that tag value (via a principal-tag mapping or direct grant) inherits the permissions on all resources tagged with that value. This is similar to AWS IAM attribute-based access control (ABAC) but operates within Lake Formation's permission model, which sits between the Data Catalog and the underlying S3 data. Under the hood, Lake Formation uses AWS Glue Data Catalog APIs and temporary credentials (vended via GetTable and GetTableVersion) to enforce these permissions, ensuring that even if a user has direct S3 access, they cannot bypass Lake Formation controls for registered locations.

KKey Concepts to Remember

  • Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.
  • Find the constraint that changes the correct option.
  • Eliminate answers that are true in general but not in this case.

TExam Day Tips

  • Watch for words such as best, first, most likely and least administrative effort.
  • Review why wrong options are wrong, not only why the correct option is correct.

Key takeaway

Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.

Real-world example

How this comes up in practice

A media company stores terabytes of video archives that are accessed once a year for audit purposes. Moving these objects to a cold storage tier (Azure Archive, S3 Glacier, or Google Nearline) costs a fraction of hot storage. Questions like this test whether you understand storage tiers, access frequency tradeoffs, and retrieval latency requirements.

What to study next

Got this wrong? Here's your next step.

Identify which exam domain this question belongs to, review the core concept, then practise similar questions from the same domain.

Related practice questions

Related DEA-C01 practice-question pages

Use these pages to review the topic behind this question. This is how one missed question becomes focused revision.

Practice this exam

Start a free DEA-C01 practice session

Short sessions build daily habit. Longer sessions build exam-day stamina. Try a timed session to simulate real conditions.

FAQ

Questions learners often ask

What does this DEA-C01 question test?

Data Security and Governance — This question tests Data Security and Governance — Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer..

What is the correct answer to this question?

The correct answer is: In Lake Formation, create an LF-tag 'access_level' with values 'analyst' and 'admin'. Grant 'SELECT' permission on the 'customer' table to the tag value 'analyst'. Associate the LF-tag with the 'customer' table. — Option A is correct because Lake Formation LF-tags allow you to define metadata tags (key-value pairs) and grant permissions to those tags. By creating an LF-tag 'access_level' with values 'analyst' and 'admin', granting SELECT on the 'customer' table to the tag value 'analyst', and associating that LF-tag with the table, only principals who have the tag 'access_level=analyst' (or are granted via the tag) can query the table. This enforces tag-based access control at the Lake Formation permission layer, which is the intended mechanism for fine-grained, attribute-based access control in Lake Formation.

What should I do if I get this DEA-C01 question wrong?

Identify which exam domain this question belongs to, review the core concept, then practise similar questions from the same domain.

What is the key concept behind this question?

Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.

About these practice questions

Courseiva creates original exam-style practice questions with explanations and wrong-answer analysis. It does not publish real exam questions, exam dumps, or protected exam content. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →

How Courseiva writes practice questions · Editorial policy

Keep practising

More DEA-C01 practice questions

Last reviewed: Jun 11, 2026

Question Discussion

Share a tip, memory trick, or ask about the reasoning behind this question. Do not post real exam questions, leaked content, braindumps, or copyrighted exam material. Comments are moderated and may be removed without notice.

Loading comments…

Sign in to join the discussion.

This DEA-C01 practice question is part of Courseiva's free Amazon Web Services certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the DEA-C01 exam.