Question 1,563 of 1,786
Data Store ManagementeasyMultiple ChoiceObjective-mapped

DEA-C01 Data Store Management Practice Question

This DEA-C01 practice question tests your understanding of data store management. Match the stated requirement to the specific cloud service, access model, or configuration option — many options are valid in isolation but not for this scenario. After answering, compare your reasoning against the explanation and wrong-answer breakdown below. Once you have made your selection, read the full explanation to reinforce the concept and understand why each distractor is designed to mislead on exam day.

A company needs to store relational data that requires complex joins and transactional consistency. The workload is predictable and the data size is less than 500 GB. Which AWS service is MOST cost-effective for this use case?

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.

Correct answer & explanation

Amazon RDS for PostgreSQL

Amazon RDS for PostgreSQL is the most cost-effective choice because it provides a fully managed relational database service that supports complex joins and transactional consistency (ACID compliance) for predictable workloads under 500 GB. Unlike Redshift, which is optimized for petabyte-scale analytics, RDS offers lower cost for this data size and workload pattern, while DynamoDB lacks native SQL join capabilities and S3 is not a relational database.

Key principle: Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.

Answer analysis

Option-by-option breakdown

For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.

  • Amazon Redshift

    Why it's wrong here

    Redshift is a data warehouse optimized for large-scale analytics, not cost-effective for sub-500 GB relational data.

  • Amazon S3

    Why it's wrong here

    S3 is object storage, not a relational database; it cannot perform joins or transactions.

  • Amazon RDS for PostgreSQL

    Why this is correct

    RDS offers managed relational databases with full SQL support, ideal for transactional workloads up to 500 GB.

    Related concept

    Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.

  • Amazon DynamoDB

    Why it's wrong here

    DynamoDB is NoSQL and does not support complex joins or transactions across multiple tables.

Common exam traps

Common exam trap: answer the scenario, not the keyword

The trap here is that candidates often choose Amazon Redshift for any data that involves joins or analytics, ignoring that it is cost-prohibitive and architecturally mismatched for transactional, sub-500 GB workloads, while RDS is the correct relational database service for this scale.

Detailed technical explanation

How to think about this question

Under the hood, PostgreSQL uses Multi-Version Concurrency Control (MVCC) to handle transactional consistency without locking reads, enabling complex joins via hash, merge, or nested loop algorithms. For predictable workloads under 500 GB, RDS provides automatic storage scaling up to 64 TB with Provisioned IOPS, but the cost remains lower than Redshift’s per-node pricing, which starts at multiple nodes even for small datasets. A real-world scenario is an e-commerce order management system requiring JOINs between orders, customers, and inventory tables with ACID guarantees—RDS PostgreSQL handles this efficiently, while Redshift would incur unnecessary compute costs.

KKey Concepts to Remember

  • Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.
  • Find the constraint that changes the correct option.
  • Eliminate answers that are true in general but not in this case.

TExam Day Tips

  • Watch for words such as best, first, most likely and least administrative effort.
  • Review why wrong options are wrong, not only why the correct option is correct.

Key takeaway

Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.

Real-world example

How this comes up in practice

A startup's cloud architect reviews their monthly bill and notices costs are higher than expected for a long-running batch job. Switching from on-demand instances to Reserved Instances — or using Spot/Preemptible VMs — can reduce compute costs by up to 72 %. Questions like this test whether you understand the tradeoffs between commitment, flexibility, and cost across cloud pricing models.

Quick reference

AWS S3 Storage Class Comparison

Storage ClassMin DurationRetrievalUse Case
S3 StandardNoneImmediateFrequently accessed data
S3 Standard-IA30 daysImmediateInfrequent access, rapid retrieval
S3 One Zone-IA30 daysImmediateNon-critical infrequent data
S3 Intelligent-TieringNoneImmediate–hoursUnknown or changing access patterns
S3 Glacier Instant90 daysMillisecondsArchive with instant retrieval
S3 Glacier Flexible90 daysMinutes–hoursArchive, flexible retrieval
S3 Glacier Deep Archive180 daysHoursLong-term compliance archive

What to study next

Got this wrong? Here's your next step.

Identify which exam domain this question belongs to, review the core concept, then practise similar questions from the same domain.

Related practice questions

Related DEA-C01 practice-question pages

Use these pages to review the topic behind this question. This is how one missed question becomes focused revision.

Practice this exam

Start a free DEA-C01 practice session

Short sessions build daily habit. Longer sessions build exam-day stamina. Try a timed session to simulate real conditions.

FAQ

Questions learners often ask

What does this DEA-C01 question test?

Data Store Management — This question tests Data Store Management — Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer..

What is the correct answer to this question?

The correct answer is: Amazon RDS for PostgreSQL — Amazon RDS for PostgreSQL is the most cost-effective choice because it provides a fully managed relational database service that supports complex joins and transactional consistency (ACID compliance) for predictable workloads under 500 GB. Unlike Redshift, which is optimized for petabyte-scale analytics, RDS offers lower cost for this data size and workload pattern, while DynamoDB lacks native SQL join capabilities and S3 is not a relational database.

What should I do if I get this DEA-C01 question wrong?

Identify which exam domain this question belongs to, review the core concept, then practise similar questions from the same domain.

What is the key concept behind this question?

Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.

About these practice questions

Courseiva creates original exam-style practice questions with explanations and wrong-answer analysis. It does not publish real exam questions, exam dumps, or protected exam content. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →

How Courseiva writes practice questions · Editorial policy

Keep practising

More DEA-C01 practice questions

Last reviewed: Jul 4, 2026

Question Discussion

Share a tip, memory trick, or ask about the reasoning behind this question. Do not post real exam questions, leaked content, braindumps, or copyrighted exam material. Comments are moderated and may be removed without notice.

Loading comments…

Sign in to join the discussion.

This DEA-C01 practice question is part of Courseiva's free Amazon Web Services certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the DEA-C01 exam.